Started By
Message

re: Employees at Starbucks on S. Sherwood have Unionized

Posted on 1/11/24 at 6:50 pm to
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23804 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Good point. Louisiana is an at will employment state.


Engaging in union activity is protected under the NLRA and retaliation for doing so is an exception to the employment at will doctrine.

Starbucks needs to tread carefully. There are a myriad of potential unfair labor practices that can occur after a vote in favor of the union. Starbucks doesn't want to commit any ULPs. Strikers can be replaced permanently if the strike is economic. An unfair labor practice strike means no permanent replacement.
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
4583 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Starbucks needs to tread carefully. There are a myriad of potential unfair labor practices that can occur after a vote in favor of the union. Starbucks doesn't want to commit any ULPs. Strikers can be replaced permanently if the strike is economic. An unfair labor practice strike means no permanent replacement.


For a single location it’s not hard for Starbucks. Don’t agree to their demands, let them strike, close the store because there is no business.
Posted by TheSadvocate
North Shore
Member since Aug 2020
3880 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Starbucks needs to tread carefully. There are a myriad of potential unfair labor practices that can occur after a vote in favor of the union. Starbucks doesn't want to commit any ULPs


Forwarding this to their legal department in case they weren't aware
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram