- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In Landmark decision, Jury Finds Realtors Conspired to inflate Commissions|$1.8 B verdict
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:06 am to billjamin
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:06 am to billjamin
quote:
The title company thats forcing the title insurance on me has no investment to protect in my home.
Can't speak to Houston, but in Louisiana, it's optional.
But the Houston firms don't have to agree to do your transaction if you're going to cut out the majority of their profit. Some firms, if they know you don't want title insurance, may just increase their other fees a little to offset removing title insurance. Before you call that sleazy, this is no different than any business raising their prices enough to make sure at the end of the day they make enough to stay in business.
I'm sure if you and 10 friends walk into a restaurant and only order chips and salsa, the restaurant owner is going to ask you to leave if you're wasting their time. So if you tell these Houston firms "I want you to do weeks worth of work, but I want to pay jack-shite for these services," it's not that unreasonable that they tell you "No thanks."
You said in your prior post:
quote:
To be clear, i'm fine paying a title company to do their job. I'm fine with knowing they bake in malpractice insurance. A step to far is charging me for all that, then saying "well i really don't know WTF is going on so you better take out this policy"
So that sounds like as long as you're unaware that the cost of the insurance is baked into the other fees, then you're fine. But if it's a separate line item, then you're outraged? What's the difference? You're paying for the cost either way.
Posted on 11/1/23 at 11:16 am to Neauxla_Tiger
quote:To the title company? I already know they are to the underwriter. The sale of that policy is the "majority of their profit"? Really?
cut out the majority of their profit.
quote:
So if you tell these Houston firms "I want you to do weeks worth of work, but I want to pay jack-shite for these services,"
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
quote:They can't bake it in because it's impossible. Which is a good thing that people get to see the line items they get hammered with over and over by all the grifters and get irritated by it.
So that sounds like as long as you're unaware that the cost of the insurance is baked into the other fees, then you're fine. But if it's a separate line item, then you're outraged? What's the difference? You're paying for the cost either way.
If you're curious how many people thinks its asinine, look at the upvote/down vote ratio of my original post. There's just a few of you knighting in here trying to justify it.
This post was edited on 11/1/23 at 11:27 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)