- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Israel–Hamas War Discussion Thread: News Links On First Page
Posted on 10/25/23 at 8:34 pm to LegendInMyMind
Posted on 10/25/23 at 8:34 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Today, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted to support Israel and condemn Hamas. 412 representatives voted in favor, 10 voted against, and 6 voted present.
No votes: @RepBowman, @RepAndreCarson, @RepCori, @RepAlGreen, @RepSummerLee, @AOC, @Ilhan, @repdeliaramirez, @RepRashida, @RepThomasMassie
Present votes: @RepCasar,@JoaquinCastrotx, @NydiaVelazquez, @RepPressley, @RepChuyGarcia, @RepJayapal
One of those is not like the others.
Posted on 10/25/23 at 8:45 pm to BuckyCheese
Massie has a statement on X.
quote:
I condemn the barbaric attack on Israel and I affirm Israel’s right to defend itself.
However, I will not be voting for House Resolution 771 today because:
1) It calls for sanctions on a sovereign country. Sanctions are a prelude to war and hurt the citizens of the country more than the government of the country that’s being sanctioned. And ultimately, sanctions create laws that will be used to prosecute American citizens (who engage in trade), not citizens of the sanctioned country. In short, sanctions do not achieve their stated purposes but do breed resentment of our country abroad.
2) It asserts the necessity of foreign aid commitments which I have voted against. Our country is going bankrupt and we can’t afford to borrow money to send overseas, yet this resolution states that we should.
3) It contains an open-ended promise of military support that is so broad that it could be interpreted to commit US soldiers to the conflict. US troops should not be engaged in this conflict.
4) It tends to broaden the conflict to other countries when it would be better to keep the war contained geographically.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News