Started By
Message

re: Correlation between US food ingredients, cancer, and healthcare expenditures

Posted on 7/6/23 at 3:56 pm to
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18539 posts
Posted on 7/6/23 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

The fact we're only two years off of their life expectancy is a testament to the healthcare system in this country, if anything, given our shitty diet, lack of exercise, and preference for sugary, processed foods.


I saw a rather terrifying video clip of a doctor responding the motto “live fast, die young.” He explained how that saying doesn’t really apply any more because modern medicine can keep almost anyone alive. If you go to the doctor at least once a year for a checkup or report any abnormalities in a timely manner, they’ll catch problems before they kill you. Even heart disease, cancers, diabetes: doctors can keep people alive for a long time.

But just because you’re drugged up or surgically repaired, it doesn’t mean that you have your mobility or cognitive abilities or overall health. You’re alive, but you’re a burden to your family and a drain to society.

After that video, and after listening to Peter Attia, lifespan doesn’t mean much to me. We might be two years off of some higher quality European country, but I’m curious about quantifying healthspan. Who has people active and mobile into their 70s and 80s? Who has their elderly functioning with a positive disposition? Who is more likely to feel like life is painful and over by 60?

Give me longevity with healthspan. It’s what really matters. And Americans are mostly struggling in that regard.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram