re: Fed. District Court in GA unsealed a 96-page report describing vulnerabilities in Dominion

I read the study this morning and I agree, the Dominion process is loaded with vulnerabilities, most obvious is the QR code method. I questioned the ballot QR code vulnerabilities the first time I voted with it, years ago. It is an intentionally designed vulnerability, to hide fraud and exclude competition from the voting system business:

(1) As the QR code is what the scanner reads. The scanner doesn't even look for the names you voted for. The QR code could be anything and you would have no idea what it is.

(2) Also, the code is proprietary, so if you took a pic of the code to take away with you, you still would not know what it represents. No one can interpret the code without Dominion keys

(3) Why not use OCR and read the names? At least voters would know for sure what was on the ballot

(4) with OCR, any contractor could count the ballots during an audit and any auditor could visually read the ballot content

(5) OCR would remove on major fraud vulnerability

Some would argue that OCR is not fast enough or accurate enough but that is a lie. Those ballot scanners read one ballot at a time, so it does not require a fast process. Ballots can be printed with an OCR friendly font. The voter walks up to a scanner and lays it in the feeder one at a time. It could be a simple strait forward process.

QR codes have a lot of valid applications but counting ballots is not one of them