re: Famed atheist and biologist calls the idea of more than two genders “utter nonsense”

quote:

---

What about the rest of the population who don't want to share a restroom with people playing dressup?

That's pretty damn selfish for one person to expect total accommodation.

---

I don't know that many people actually care one way or another about someone playing dressup in the restroom.

The question that jumps to mind immediately is how are you going to know they are playing dress up??? What kind of weird shite are y'all doing in a restroom where you can determine a person's biological sex who, from all outward appearances, is the appropriate gender for the bathroom they are in. They may be uglier than hell but that ain't no reason to ban them from the appropriate restroom. The only plausible explanation for folks being this concerned over someone who appears to be one sex, even ugly folks who appear to be one sex aligned with the appropriate bathroom is that they are somehow sneaking a peek at the other person's plumbing. That is some sick, twisted shite.

Even more twisted is that fact that everyone I ever heard who made this argument about the bathroom will also support the idea that a person ought to use the bathroom provided for the gender they were assigned at birth. This is to protect the children, of course. The question is, which is more likely to arouse the curiosity of a child than seeing a man in a dress pissing at a urinal or a woman in overalls and a plaid shirt sitting down to piss in a stall? It is obvious y'all aint ever taken a child to a public restroom or you would know damn well whats going to happen the first time a 5 year old sees a man in a dress pissing at a urinal. Its going to be less noticeable than that same man standing up to piss in a stall in the ladies room. Y'all aint thought this one through at all.....