re: Famed atheist and biologist calls the idea of more than two genders “utter nonsense”

quote:

---

As far as the qualifier I used it was slightly important...universal and almost universal are not synonymous. The post you are referring to is the reason I used that qualifier...very few things in life are absolute....

---

Wow, saw that response coming from a mile away too.

Translation: "I'm full of shite, and got called out, so even though my claim that animal names in Latin-based languages are almost universally masculine has fallen apart on cursory inspection, I'm going to claim victory because I said 'almost universal' and not just 'universal'"

Let's play a game and take this to it's logical conclusion, sophist. What % threshold of animal names being masculine would it take for your claim of "almost universal" to be accurate? I've got time...hell, let's run the whole gamut and see if you're right.

ETA: For kicks, I just reviewed 125 Italian animal names at random on a flashcard website. Verdict: 76 masculine, 49 feminine.

Being the sophist you are, I'm sure you'll try to claim that ratio proves "almost universal masculinity"

One more time for the record...you've proven that you will attempt to lie and obfuscate simple matters like these, so whatever else you say should be considered dubious.