Started By
Message

re: So about that defensive holding call in the SB.....

Posted on 2/17/23 at 6:53 am to
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
15033 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 6:53 am to
I think one interesting thing is that no one is arguing that it was not a hold. The main arguments you hear is either "you can't decide a game at the end like that" and "they were letting that go all game why call it now"?

From my perspective if the call is legit - and it was - no doubt - you can't really support the outrage over it, time to move on.

The first hold definitely altered both the route and the timing - and it appears clear to me....fairly significantly. The second was one that I could have seen being let go and if that had been the only one I could see the case being made as more legit.
Posted by rlebl39
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2011
4743 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:19 am to
quote:

From my perspective if the call is legit - and it was - no doubt - you can't really support the outrage over it, time to move on.


I’m not outraged over the call. I think it was ticky tack and didn’t have an affect on the play but I don’t have a dog in the fight for this game so I really don’t care.

What has me legit losing my mind though is OP saying Bradberry had Juju on the ground.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram