Started By
Message

re: DOTD changes up I-10 widening project. Less pain(?), more expense, more time.

Posted on 1/30/23 at 5:16 pm to
Posted by TheAstroTiger
Member since Jun 2018
3101 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 5:16 pm to
So lane closures were originally scheduled to last a year but now two? Whoever wrote this article was not clear in many areas.
Posted by BigB0882
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
5323 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 5:44 pm to
I don’t get it. The traffic always backs up Eastbound. Almost never Westbound. Of course, Westbound never comes down to 1 lane normally but the Eastbound traffic is going to extend to Texas. I work in Brusly but live in EBR. I don’t see how this is going to be feasible for me for 2+ (?) years.
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 5:45 pm
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57576 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

So lane closures were originally scheduled to last a year but now two? Whoever wrote this article was not clear in many areas.


The entire idea behind making it one lane in that stretch was that it would suck for a year but total time spent on construction would be less. Construction zones create traffic regardless. Now they are reducing it to two lanes but it will increase the time spent working in that area by a year
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram