- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ok the targeting rule has to be reassessed
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:50 pm to FlappingPierre
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:50 pm to FlappingPierre
No, it was a good clean hit.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:51 pm to POTUS2024
Crown of the helmet to the head/neck area of a defenseless player. That was textbook targeting and could be used as a prime example of the penalty.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:56 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
No, it was a good clean hit.
Man I can't imagine going through life being this dumb
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:04 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
No, it was a good clean hit
Yup seemed that the defender had his head up and made a hard hit to a ball carrier. But I've seen that called targeting so damn often why wasn't it this time? I've seen less hits than that get called as targeting.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News