re: Brooks had possession

quote:

---

He had 2 hands on the ball but he didn’t have possession. Total shite rule but, it was the right call.

---

I agree, having 2 hands on a ball for a split second does not constitute possession. If I weren't so lazy, I could show you many screenshots AFTER the one posted here where he did NOT have hands on the ball.

To me the real question is if the Gump really touched the ball. The angle of the replay camera's last night appear that he whiffed over the ball.

Anybody have an angle where it is conclusive that he toughed the ball. To me seemed inconclusive and should not have been overturned.