Started By
Message

re: Trump says leaning toward 15-week national abortion ban.

Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:30 am to
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79235 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Yes I think you’re right. I believe I read this entire thing wrong, and was thinking pro-lifers want the cutoff to be less than 15 weeks or something.


I mean we do, but we'll take what we can get
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16418 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:31 am to
I agree that it should be left to the States, and any campaigning around abortion should be how/why it needs to be left at the States. But I have 3 questions about this:

quote:

leaning toward a 15-week national ban on abortion but supports exceptions for rape, incest and saving the life of the mother

1) Why even allow it to go into the 2nd trimester?
2) Do victims of rape & incest need more than 15 weeks to make these decisions?
3) I thought "saving the of the mother" was a clear medical term that was excluded from abortion laws anyway
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112511 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Disagree strongly. Leave it alone with the states.

True. The statistics show since Roe v. Wade was overturned the number of abortions has increased slightly. People are simply going to states where it's legal.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79235 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:32 am to
quote:

The idea that we should be negotiating on how long of a window do we have to allow women to kill offspring without losing votes is a good enough reason to never vote again


Just imagine all the big successes we can have if we just concede on...

*checks notes*

the inherent worth of humanity itself
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79235 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:33 am to
quote:

True. The statistics show since Roe v. Wade was overturned the number of abortions has increased slightly. People are simply going to states where it's legal.


it's due to mifepristone and misoprostol
Posted by mtb010
San Antonio
Member since Sep 2009
4393 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:34 am to
I mean, I believe that at the moment of conception you are formed in God's image. So, I agree with him, but I don't agree with the national ban. Let the states determine.
Posted by sta4ever
The Pit
Member since Aug 2014
15194 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:35 am to
quote:

I mean we do, but we'll take what we can get


Yeah I agree with that as well. I just misinterpreted this article and thread. Trump definitely shouldn’t push for a cutoff date that’s too extreme. Will have to settle somewhere in the middle to not lose voters.

However, he should absolutely just say it’s up to the states, and not give an amount of weeks or something. I agree with yall, I don’t think that’s a good strategy from him. I just find it hard to believe that abortion will be the deciding factor for whether people want to vote for Trump or not. If you care about social issues, you aren’t voting for Trump regardless of what he says he’ll do. If you care about the economy and things that matter, then abortion won’t make someone not vote for Trump. Just my two cents.
Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
11716 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:36 am to
Even talking about this, is like shooting himself in the foot. Same with not distancing himself from the COVID vaxx.

I love the man, but he needs some better advice on both these topics.
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
9248 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:38 am to
“Reuters”

“Trump Signals”

Don’t fall for this sham article
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44881 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:38 am to
Republicans need to leave this alone. It is a losing issue.
Posted by jennBN
Member since Jun 2010
3151 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:38 am to
So how would a federal ban affect those states which have codified abortion in their constitution? For instance, California?

I am a simpleton when it comes to constitutional law but wouldn't state law trump a federal ban anyway?

What's the point of the federal ban then?
Posted by Old Character
Member since Jan 2018
864 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:38 am to
He’s fricking stupid to even be talking about this.
Posted by 9Fiddy
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2007
64083 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Disagree strongly. Leave it alone with the states.

This. If the polling is truly correct (which I am serious skeptical about), all he has to do is not step on any land mines. And this is the biggest of them all. The suburban white women are trickling back to the right, but if abortion becomes a hot topic, they'll run right back to the left.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
15641 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:41 am to
Or you do nothing and leave it to the states. If a whore wants her abortion she can cross state lines.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
7213 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:42 am to
He’ll lose the election with that stance.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73851 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:43 am to
15 week ban bad strategy!

6 week ban is the winner! -the bots
Posted by jennBN
Member since Jun 2010
3151 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:43 am to
quote:

whore


What is her male partner referred to in this scenario? How do we refer to the man who neglects to practice safe sex with a woman he knows so little about that she aborts their offspring?
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
25022 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:44 am to
This going to hurt him and down ballot conservatives.

You cannot make the case for years that abortion is a state’s issue to overturn RvW, then rush in with a federal abortion ban after the fact.

Bad move IMO. Voters aren’t going to like this.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79235 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:44 am to
quote:

It’s a deal with the devil and the devil never pays his end


I guess my question is what are we conceding?

In a hypothetical world where this went into law, provided it didn't require states to allow abortions up to 15 weeks (thereby allowing 6, 9, 10 week bans, etc.) - what do we lose here?

I could see an argument that it's the government of the United States declaring in a sense that abortion up to 15 weeks is one of our values, but don't we already do that and worse?
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79235 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:46 am to
quote:

15 week ban bad strategy!

6 week ban is the winner! -the bots


uh, have you seen my posts in this thread?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram