Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

study: plurality of student loan relief going to 750k Americans who earn 312,000/year

Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:33 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69301 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:33 pm
Jesus Christ
quote:


Penn-Wharton: Biden's new student loan plan will cost taxpayers another $84B, bringing total to $559B.

The biggest winners are 750,000 people with 20 years in repayment.

Their average debt relief is $25,500+ and average household income is $312,000+.


LINK
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48325 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:34 pm to
20 years of income based repayment then forgiveness has been the rule for over a decade.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36047 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:35 pm to
Democrats hate ordinary working class people. How anyone in flyover country or who works a blue collar job can vote for these ghouls is beyond me.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
15813 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:35 pm to
Nobody talks about this fact. The stereotype is the tattooed barista with an art history degree and $200K of debt from Oberlin, but most of the relief is going to people with graduate degrees, a lot of doctors and lawyers.
Posted by chili pup
Member since Sep 2011
2444 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:37 pm to
"Biden dem" votes.
This post was edited on 4/12/24 at 9:08 pm
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81756 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:38 pm to
HHTM thanks for a quality link. What are your thoughts on this?
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19248 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:41 pm to
Once upon a time, you could discharge loans through bankruptcy, but lawyers and doctors started to take advantage of that process
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
7713 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 4:03 pm to
Dude, didn’t you vote for this?
Posted by theronswanson
House built with my hands
Member since Feb 2012
2976 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 4:18 pm to
Averages can be manipulated by a few super large income levels. I would prefer to see the median household income.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19248 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 4:21 pm to
The strongest predictor for if a piece of legislation will be heard and enacted is support among the richest Americans. The more popular among richer Americans, the more likely it will happen
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20505 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 5:37 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/12/24 at 5:39 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68628 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:22 pm to
But Trump and covid.
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
2659 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:26 pm to
That has to be a typo. With a household income that high, carrying student loans for a 20 year term is a nuisance.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14964 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

That has to be a typo. With a household income that high, carrying student loans for a 20 year term is a nuisance.


Brookings article that looks at a couple of things stemming from a popular story from ‘18 where an orthodontist racked up >$1MM in debt but:

quote:

Income-based repayment plans cap borrower’s payments at 10 percent of their discretionary income (adjusted gross income minus 150 percent of the poverty line—$37,650 for a family of four) and forgive any remaining balance after 25 years.



So there’s an entire population of professionals (MD, DO, PT, OT, NP, DDS, OD, PharmD, JS) who take out $40-60K/y for the duration of professional school (and many who did the same in undergrad). In particular, the MD/DO bunch have a unique situation:
They graduate with a Year 1 Earning Potential of around $50-60K. It basically doesn’t change through Year 3 (there’s an exception that’s practically not worth talking about), and many ride this out through 6-7 years. At that point, they’re accustomed to $200-400K in debt and paying based on some of these repayment program rules. There are a number of ways they go, though, mainly PSLF lately, which is different than what’s going on here, but this was an option for many who were bad at math: they learned what they made, what would be taken, and that it would eventually go away. It ballooned the whole time. It doesn’t make good financial sense, but instead of tackling debt or living on less than they make, they have a “how much a month?” mindset and get in these extreme scenarios (according to the link, in ‘18 there were about 100 folks with over a million in debt. Averages skew to outliers to some extent).


To be very fair, these programs have little to do with the current administration (with the exception of him being around in the Senate when the laws were written). It’s disappointing to see all the “proposed student loan debt relief” mix the finances insane “FORGIVE IT ALL” ideas with the programs that have been in place for a long time (PSLF started in ‘07, the concept of income-driven repayments has been around since the 70s, though I am too lazy and not well-enough versed to spout off when their current iterations with forgiveness went into effect). It would be nice to see it broken down as to which program is forgiving how much vs what’s being proposed in addition to decades-old programs (which doesn’t suggest that the current programs necessarily should stand as is, but to saddle Biden for IDR and PSLF payments is just simply mischaracterization of an older problem. Calling on him to fix it would be entirely appropriate, though, but I’m a pretty firm believer in, “what you promised has to ride out, but you don’t have to promise it to the next crew.”
In other words, I can’t think of a logic that would permit pulling these programs away today without honoring them for the next 10-20 years to those who entered them that wouldn’t also lay the footwork for the government to say, “Hm. Roth accounts. Those look pretty taxable at withdrawal.”
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68263 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 11:23 pm to
Student loan relief should not happen. But, if this is true, it's better than it going to the usual suspects. People making 300k are paying 50k or more in just federal income taxes every year.
Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
8152 posts
Posted on 4/13/24 at 3:46 am to
If you make 312k a year and are still paying loans at 20 years, you probably should have done some things differently.

In theory they should have buckled down and paid that off sooner. But I guess they’re smarter than me since they’ve now had it erased.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50164 posts
Posted on 4/13/24 at 4:29 am to
Are we outraged that the average salary for someone with 20 years of experience is $155k?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50164 posts
Posted on 4/13/24 at 4:30 am to
quote:

If your household make 312k a year
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
9425 posts
Posted on 4/13/24 at 5:11 am to
quote:

Averages can be manipulated by a few super large income


Not when its 750k people, shite for brains.
Posted by SippyCup
Gulf Coast
Member since Sep 2008
6141 posts
Posted on 4/13/24 at 5:23 am to
quote:

That has to be a typo. With a household income that high, carrying student loans for a 20 year term is a nuisance.


Not when it’s on auto pay and interest rates of less than 2%.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram