- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:16 pm to tigerinDC09
They didn't do Bernie any favors.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:16 pm to tigerinDC09
On the 2nd item. Once mueller drops indictment it will go to the third.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:17 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
HIllary clinton - obstruction of justice, deleting 33k emails, destroying evidence with hammers, perjury, pay for play, money laundering and the list goes on
Well where is your "beleaguered" AG on this prosecution!?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:18 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
HIllary clinton - obstruction of justice, deleting 33k emails, destroying evidence with hammers, perjury, pay for play, money laundering and the list goes on
And she's not being prosecuted under the current admin because? Or maybe she will be?
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:18 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
tigerinDC09
Another day of paranoia threads
Yall are pathetic
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:20 pm to cahoots
quote:
And she's not being prosecuted under the current admin because?
she is a better foil than anything else. If you investigate and prosecute her, she is no longer going to rile the crowds up.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:24 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:And at least 3 of those are matters entered into the official record by her own admissions, yet she remains unindicted because, why? Intent?
HIllary clinton - obstruction of justice, deleting 33k emails, destroying evidence with hammers, perjury, pay for play, money laundering...
Yet the Far Left and their apologists will never acknowledge any of that because, why? They are fundamentally craven and mendacious?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:34 pm to tigerinDC09
I've worked cases where the Federal Grand Jury didn't indict.
I had an arrest wher the defendant had a Kilo of Cocaine and a gun under the seat and they refused to indict because it was a rental car. "It could have been left there by somebody else".
I don't believe these statistics.
I had an arrest wher the defendant had a Kilo of Cocaine and a gun under the seat and they refused to indict because it was a rental car. "It could have been left there by somebody else".
I don't believe these statistics.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 2:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
think it cheapens politics.
Cheapens? Poor choice of a word for coup.
This is a flat out coup.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:05 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
On the 2nd item. Once mueller drops indictment it will go to the third.
same thing can be said if he finds zero collusion with Russia.
Instead brings charges of some embezzlement/racketeering of trump associate years ago.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:15 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Thanks for describing juries under Jim Crow.
WRONG! Grand Jury does not convict, they only decided whether there is enough evidence to indict based solely upon the prosecution's testimony
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:31 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
All we need to know now are the targets. It's already known than Flynn and Manafort are targets, so they're likely already cooked.
The next question is if they turn on the Trump family for a plea deal.
Why would they want to piss off the one man that can pardon them of any crime they have ever committed?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:39 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Once that was decided, if indictment is allowed, what is your understanding of where the criminal trial would take place?
Most probably in Virginia - Northern District that is where this kind of stuff usually happens.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 3:52 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
1. Violation of FARA
Usually entails a fine in the form of withholding military retirement to the amount received....doubtful you could get Flynn to roll on a 45K fine.
quote:
2. Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse act
If anything that is on Assange.
quote:
3. Conspiracy to violate computer fraud and abuse
All hinges on #2 plus you would have to prove that there was coordination between the Trump campaign and Assange or the "Russian" hackers. CIA and Intel community does not want their methods revealed.....it would screw them in the future.....trust me on this.
quote:
4. Violation of Federal election campaign Act
Iffy on this as well . If you can determine that the Russian lawyer actually gave the Trump team any information, then you might have a case, but then you would probably have to go and indict just about every politician in DC that gets unsolicited dirt. At worst it's a Dinesh D'Souza type of B.S. crime.....usually an FEC fine. It's thin, thin, very skinny . Plus, most of the dirt ends up in the public realm via Wikileaks.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:01 pm to tigerinDC09
Thanks for the witch hunt confirmation
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:05 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
All we need to know now are the targets
Why don't we know this yet?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:09 pm to tigerinDC09
The kook da in Travis county tx returns trash indictments against republicans all the time
If the indictments are bullshite it will be obvious
If the indictments are bullshite it will be obvious
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:10 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:I guess Mueller can control the leaks better than politicians.
Why don't we know this yet?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 4:29 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Report: Federal Grand Juries voted to indict defendant 99.9% of the time
like when the grand jury came back w/ no bill of indictment against Bill Clinton?
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News