- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mega church Pastor resigns, apologizes to LGBT Mafia
Posted on 7/29/19 at 5:51 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 7/29/19 at 5:51 pm to FooManChoo
quote:The premise that that’s what I mean is why I don’t engage with people asking for clarification.
It can be trying to physically harm or harass homosexuals to hurt them
Either you know what I’m talking about and are sea-lioning/sandbagging/trolling/etc., or you’re confused about something, and it isn’t my job to un-confuse you.
This post was edited on 7/29/19 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 7/29/19 at 5:52 pm to bfniii
Because I don’t respect you.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 5:58 pm to xiv
quote:You can think what you want, but again, the point of discussion is to communicate ideas to one another. If there is a lack of clarity, the discussion isn't going to go anywhere. If you suspect someone is trolling, that's one thing, but if they are seriously wanting to understand, I don't see why begrudgingly providing clarification is a bad thing.
The premise that that’s what I mean is why I don’t engage with people asking for clarification.
Either you know what I’m talking about and are sea-lioning/sandbagging/trolling/etc., or you’re confused about something, and it isn’t my job to un-confuse you.
ETA: and it saves more time to have one post clarifying than several more having a separate discussion about the issue of clarity.
This post was edited on 7/29/19 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 7/29/19 at 6:01 pm to FooManChoo
quote:Yep, and I’ve had the “what do you mean by ‘gay-bashing?’” conversation 1,000,000 times, and today won’t be the 1,000,001st.
the point of discussion is to communicate ideas to one another.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 6:03 pm to xiv
quote:
Because I don’t respect you
you don't know the first thing about me. for all you know, i could be one of your friends.
so you won't respond on substance because you think you don't respect someone you can't possibly know anything personal about. well, that makes sense.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 6:38 pm to bfniii
quote:
yes, it is still a choice
No it's not
quote:
comply or not.
That's not how that works. There is no actual second choice for the person you're making them follow you by threating them.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 7:03 pm to anc
Again and again in the Bible the prophets and apostles are depicted as men whose message and delivery is so unbelievably offensive to society around them that they are frequently beaten, arrested, jailed, stoned and martyred. Any pastor that goes out of their way to cater to worldliness and seem respectable to mainstream society is probably doing it wrong and should be met with skepticism.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 8:01 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:this is so stupid. you are admitting it's a choice, comply or not, and then saying it's not a choice. i don't know how you can't see that
No it's not
quote:it most certainly is. you are presented with 2 options
That's not how that works
quote:yes there is. to not comply. it's a choice because you could opt to comply. that is the very definition of choice. just because you don't like it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
There is no actual second choice for the person
quote:no, it's not coercion. you are not kicking them off a cliff
you're making them follow you
quote:a threat is not ineluctable force. it's just a threat.
threating them
you are still conflating the result the choice. the result is downstream of the choice.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 8:14 pm to bfniii
quote:
you don't know the first thing about me.
quote:
we're not talking about love. We're talking about gay sex.
quote:
by bfniii
Posted on 7/29/19 at 9:58 pm to FooManChoo
FooManChoo’s theology is always excellent.
I spend most of my time on reddit now.
The discussions are less frustrating. There’s hardly any foundation to be found with most here. Sad!
I spend most of my time on reddit now.
The discussions are less frustrating. There’s hardly any foundation to be found with most here. Sad!
Posted on 7/29/19 at 10:03 pm to bayoubengals88
quote:
The discussions are less frustrating.
For starters you've got to have two people interested in discussing theology instead of one person interested in discussing theology trying to engage an assortment of trolls.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:12 pm to razthecat
quote:
Eh the old testament God (flood the earth to kill all sinners) seems a ton different than the new testament God (give my only son up as a sacrifice for forgiveness of all the new sinners that showed up after I flooded the place) Seems like if it is the same guy he had a change of heart at some point, quit wiping out entire populations and brought in a new option other than turn em to salt then burn their eternal spirit in hellfire.
Pretty much the first major heresy-two gods, one who created the cruel, harsh unfeeling natural material world and one who sent Jesus to fix everything. Marcion.
It's pretty much the main reason why the Creeds emphasize "One God", not to defend Christianity from false accusations of pantheism regarding the Trinity, but to quench the Marcionite wildfire with summaries of the Church's core beliefs and what she taught.
Celibacy was a primary tenet of his cult (because the material world and our flesh were created evil by the bad god). You would have thought Marcion's heresy have had few takers on those terms.
Interestingly many heresies embrace some version of the lie that Christianity is only about ethereal spiritual matters and not the total restoration and healing of the created order as well as our spirits, our souls, and our physical bodies. Heresies like these make a mockery of the Faith and denigrate the Incarnation.
It's sad to see these ancient heresies plaguing the Church and confusing so many people.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:25 pm to anc
How much you want to bet he resigned and renounced, but was sure to keep the money he accumulated?
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:29 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
The very thing he used to cash in on the Word of God is what undid him, chastity.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:34 pm to anc
quote:
And the fault of it lies on the church.
No
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:34 pm to 3nOut
quote:
If you claim to be a Christian and celebrate sexual deviancy of any type or play fast and loose with the Bible, then hell yes I’m going to judge you
St. Paul could've hardly said it better.
quote:
I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people.
Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world.
But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.
For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? But those who are outside God judges.
Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”
1 Corinthians 5:9-14
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:36 pm to PickupAutist
quote:
chastity
Money and women/men, usually the two things these Mega pastors can't overcome.
This post was edited on 7/29/19 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:50 pm to bfniii
Comply or die is not a legitimate choice. That's the point I'm making, how can you call something free will when you are given only one true legitimate option. Sorry I don't see follow me or go to hell as an actual choice and therefore making any free will moot. When the idea of free will is pointless then it might as well not exist.
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:56 pm to PickupAutist
quote:
Any pastor that goes out of their way to cater to worldliness and seem respectable to mainstream society is probably doing it wrong and should be met with skepticism.
And it's always about them. If you want to become an apostate, then fine. But just leave and stfu.
This post was edited on 7/29/19 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 7/29/19 at 11:57 pm to dawgfan24348
I'm of the belief that freedom of the will is not a biblical concept, but that freedom of volition is.
We do not go to Hell for rejecting God. We go to Hell because we're judged by our representative Adam and we compound our judgement with our own sins, of which is the rejection of God.
Hell is the default. There is no gun pointed to anyone's head. We all desire to reject God's authority and to raise ourselves up as gods. We all would rather go to Hell than submit to Christ's Lordship through faith. It takes a new nature being planted in us by God before we will want to desire Him. Sin is what we want. Hell is what we deserve. We freely choose to sin and rebel because that's what we naturally desire.
Repent and put your trust in Jesus Christ to be reconciled to God. He is the only way.
We do not go to Hell for rejecting God. We go to Hell because we're judged by our representative Adam and we compound our judgement with our own sins, of which is the rejection of God.
Hell is the default. There is no gun pointed to anyone's head. We all desire to reject God's authority and to raise ourselves up as gods. We all would rather go to Hell than submit to Christ's Lordship through faith. It takes a new nature being planted in us by God before we will want to desire Him. Sin is what we want. Hell is what we deserve. We freely choose to sin and rebel because that's what we naturally desire.
Repent and put your trust in Jesus Christ to be reconciled to God. He is the only way.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News