- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you could elect W or Bill again, who would get your vote?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:18 pm to Alahunter
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:18 pm to Alahunter
You're smarter then this.
Who decided to invade Iraq?
We were fighting the correct enemy in Afghanistan...but hey...that wasn't a big enough arse kicking so we decided to piss stomp a second mideast nation.
Did we or did we not have a surplus prior to W.
Who handed the money out again?
But hey, hang on to your beliefs just how they are now.
They serve you so well.
quote:
Weapons of Mass Destruction Mission Accomplished The decision to invade Iraq will go down in history as an indefensible exercise of American power 4,500 U.S. troops were killed waterboarding Patriot Act
Again, not likely to have ever happened, had Bill not dropped the ball, covering up his scandals.
Who decided to invade Iraq?
We were fighting the correct enemy in Afghanistan...but hey...that wasn't a big enough arse kicking so we decided to piss stomp a second mideast nation.
quote:
Inherited a surplus from Bill Clinton and promptly gave it away by cutting taxes in a way that disproportionately benefited the wealthy.
Did we or did we not have a surplus prior to W.
quote:
False bubble created under Clinton, because of Dem policies.
Who handed the money out again?
But hey, hang on to your beliefs just how they are now.
They serve you so well.
3
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:22 pm to Alahunter
quote:
That's what got Bill in to begin with.
Myth. I can provide solid data that Perot hurt Clinton as much as Bush I, but it would ruin the shared history of the numbnuts.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:26 pm to asurob1
quote:
Who handed the money out again?
Yep. Iceland went the opposite route and it might not have been painless, but they have lower unemployment and aren't that much worse off in terms of debt.
They (unlike the D's and RINOs) were smart enough to realize it doesn't make sense to throw more money at the people who created the mess.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:31 pm to VOR
quote:
VOR
dr
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:32 pm to VOR
quote:Oh cuz!
Myth. I can provide solid data that Perot hurt Clinton as much as Bush
You may even believe that BS.
But sans Perot, Clinton would be a mere historic footnote.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:36 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Oh cuz!
You may even believe that BS.
You're wrong, bro. All reliable data demonstrate an even split among Perot voters. FACT.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:39 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Yep. Iceland went the opposite route and it might not have been painless, but they have lower unemployment and aren't that much worse off in terms of debt.
They (unlike the D's and RINOs) were smart enough to realize it doesn't make sense to throw more money at the people who created the mess.
Yup, I said we should of let them all fail. It would of sucked in the short term. But in the long term it would of been far and away better for the nation.
But hey our politicians never think about the long term.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:44 pm to asurob1
All you need to know about Bill Clinton:
He is a big part of why this happened also IMO:
He is a big part of why this happened also IMO:
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:47 pm to asurob1
Our politicians never think farther ahead than their next election cycle. Term limits would solve this problem
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:52 pm to VOR
quote:At best a guess.
All reliable data
At worst left leaning, with an agenda.
Clinton didn't even hit 50% vs Dole.
Bottomline: Clinton could not have overcome Bush inevitability if Perot was not in the race.
Bottomline: There was one reason Perot was in the race, he hated GHWB. His objective was to ensure Bush lost the election, and he accomplished it.
Now retrospectively, a litany of Clinton apologists can claim Clinton would have won anyway. I can guarantee you, in doing so they are inappropriately discounting the two-on-one BS that was the 1992 campaign and debates, and the effect that had.
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:54 pm to asurob1
quote:
Did we or did we not have a surplus prior to W.
No, we did not.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:58 pm to weagle99
quote:. . . as well
All you need to know about Bill Clinton:
He is a big part of why this happened
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:59 pm to tidehillcrest
Bill v. W? W.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:59 pm to Alahunter
quote:The internet bubble was a creation by Democrats under Bill Clinton?!?
False bubble created under Clinton, because of Dem policies.
Do you even read what you write?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:01 pm to mmcgrath
W
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:01 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
The internet bubble was a creation by Democrats under Bill Clinton?!?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:59 pm to tidehillcrest
They were both pretty terrible in their own right.
However, I'd put Bill in over W right now simply because I feel W's supporting cast may get us into another scuffle and we really can't afford that right now.
But damn, I really don't know. Reno is a big detraction for me.
However, I'd put Bill in over W right now simply because I feel W's supporting cast may get us into another scuffle and we really can't afford that right now.
But damn, I really don't know. Reno is a big detraction for me.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 11:10 pm to Easy
I don't think that anybody over 35 is picking W.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 11:11 pm to tidehillcrest
Bill Clinton
Posted on 3/8/14 at 11:12 pm to tidehillcrest
W because he at least had integrity.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News