Started By
Message

re: FCC announces plan to reverse Title II net neutrality

Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10480 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Link?



LINK

LINK
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24828 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

This is just like a few weeks ago the fat **** doctor on United. That plane belongs to United, they tell you to get off, get the frick off, it's THEIR plane and they have a contract that says "we can remove you from the plane for yada yada yada"


You're quite wrong, but I don't want to hijack the thread.
This post was edited on 4/26/17 at 2:54 pm
Posted by GFaceKillah
Welcome to the Third World
Member since Nov 2005
5935 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:48 pm to
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10480 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

If enough customers tell an ISP to frick off because of its internet policies, guess what the ISP will do?


Nothing. That's one of the benefits of being a monopoly, especially when you own a monopoly of a critical service.

You can't be a functional citizen in today's society without an internet connection. So, you have to take what you're given - and the ISPs are very much aware of that.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24828 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Most people do not have another choice for another ISP. I live in a major metro area and have one choice - Charter. If I moved to the other side of the city I would still have one choice, but it would be with Comcast. In Baton Rouge, or anywhere in Louisiana, your only actual option is Cox. DSL is a far slower technology that simply can't compete. So that's the reality. What happens when the handful of mega ISPs start requiring you to pay $150+ per month for the "full tier" internet package that allows you to visit any website you want, while all other cheaper internet packages block access to most sites, such as this one? The market can't punish them because there is no market.


I guess power companies sort of fall into the same category due to their infrastructure.
Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
58662 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:49 pm to
So I'm guessing this is bad news for streamers?
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24828 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

LSURussian


Do you know how full of shite you are?
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

So I'm guessing this is bad news for streamers?


It's bad news for everyone except the Big ISPs but they write checks that get Republicans elected so they get what they want.

Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19813 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:54 pm to
Good. Another step towards moving things back under the FTC. I've never understand the love affair that so many have with the Obama admin regs that moved ISP under the FCC. Please tell me of one time that heaping layers and layers of new regs on an industry worked out for the good of the consumer in the end. Anyone that claims to be conservative or libertarian should fully support these moves by the Trump admin.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24828 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

It's bad news for everyone except the Big ISPs but they write checks that get politicians elected so they get what they want.


Fixed, both sides play this game.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
90439 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:57 pm to
Good article explaining what might happen:

cnbc
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48636 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:57 pm to
facebook, google, Netflix and the rest of the members of The Internet Association are republican donors now? Are you serious? These liberal leaning companies create regulation within the states that is beneficial to them. Because of government regulation you call for regulation to fix that regulation. And if it doesn't happen it's because of Republicans? Amazing. (ETA: I know those companies aren't ISPs..they are members of the association in the OP)
This post was edited on 4/26/17 at 3:00 pm
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Anyone that claims to be conservative or libertarian should fully support these moves by the Trump admin.
A sentence evergreen in its wrongness
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Please tell me of one time that heaping layers and layers of new regs on an industry worked out for the good of the consumer in the end.


Net Neutrality is a great example of this. When you have a market that is not free and little to know competition then you have to have some sort of oversight to keep the company with the monopoly from screwing the consumer.

Please tell me how ISPs being able to tier internet access like Cable TV helps consumers.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:02 pm to
I really don't see anything in those links that proves your original statement. The government wanted companies to have an incentive to provide service to hard to access areas.

The companies say they met the government's requirements and the government agencies, one of them the FCC, agreed with them. If you don't think those agencies did their job, just remember those same government bureaucrats would be enforcing net neutrality on ISP's.

Stringing cable, fiber or otherwise, to provide internet service is a dinosaur technology.

I have at least 5 providers I could use for data/internet services where I live and only one of them has a wire coming into my house.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

LSURussian



Do you know how full of shite you are?
Nah, I had a really good shite about an hour ago. I'm good.....
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29313 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:04 pm to
This is exactly what I said about those stupid flyers that were going around with tiers of internet service that offered access to facebook, netflix, twitter, etc at different price levels:

quote:

At least one big supporter of net neutrality — Netflix — has tempered its rhetoric recently. The streaming-video company said in January that weaker net neutrality wouldn't hurt it because it's now too popular with users for broadband providers to interfere with its service. The company added that it still supports net neutrality "on a public policy basis."


This doesn't just apply to Netflix. This applies to pretty much all of the paid OTT services. Now there might be a problem for Kodi on the horizon potentially.
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

facebook, google, Netflix and the rest of the members of The Internet Association are republican donors now? Are you serious? These liberal leaning companies create regulation within the states that is beneficial to them. Because of government regulation you call for regulation to fix that regulation. And if it doesn't happen it's because of Republicans? Amazing. (ETA: I know those companies aren't ISPs..they are members of the association in the OP)


Your post makes no sense at all. The Internet Association is for Net Neutrality.

ISPs are the gate keepers to the internet. You can't reach Google, Netflix, etc without one. The Internet Associations and most a majority of consumers want all internet traffic treated equally and for the ISPs not to be able to throttle or outright block access to sites for profit.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72169 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

I'm confident if an ISP did that indiscriminately the market would punish them by customers switching to other ISP's.
Yea, with all the ISPs being available in every city or state.

If these ISPs didn't have local monopolies, your point would stand.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
90439 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:



This doesn't just apply to Netflix. This applies to pretty much all of the paid OTT services. Now there might be a problem for Kodi on the horizon potentially.


Possibly if they go back to light touch policy. The ISP's that are also TV providers have been chomping at the bit to increase their revenue stream with streaming services that people are using now instead of TV.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram