Started By
Message

re: Dallas Ebola patient to be prosecuted, circle of contact increased to 100

Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51897 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:35 pm to
You are citing a generic number originating from a paper that explored the feasibility of certain classes of agents (in this case viral heamorragic fevers) as biological weapons.

There is little hard evidence to pin it down, but a number of those who work in the field with it think that number is absurd. It's "low," but it's low compared to some pathogen need 10000+ to cause a disease

And even if you want to take that number as a given, you have to consider that that means:

That is the number of organisms that gets in your blood somehow, not what you are exposed to. If you swallow fluid with a 1000 Ebola virions and you don't have a cut, gingivitis, or an ulcer, you won't come down with it.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123848 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

It's "low," but it's low compared to some pathogen need 10000+ to cause a disease
It's not just low, it's incredibly low.

The 1-10 number, I believe, was based on aerosolized lab exposures. Don't recall anything related to weaponization. Could be. But I don't recall that. I have seen it sourced in several papers. It is as impressive as anything I've read about Ebola. Is there data out there intimating lower potency?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51897 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:51 pm to
Antedoctal


Not a lot of work done on Ebola in general and most of it by USAMRIID, which is focused on biological weapons defense.



Franz, D. R., Jahrling, P. B., Friedlander, A. M., McClain, D. J., Hoover, D. L., Bryne, W. R., Pavlin, J. A., Christopher, G. W., & Eitzen, E. M. (1997). Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological warfare agents. Jama, 278(5), 399-411.


Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57279 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

If you swallow fluid with a 1000 Ebola virions and you don't have a cut, gingivitis, or an ulcer, you won't come down with it.


With the stories circulating about how people are contracting this, I don't think this is accurate. I have no evidence, just a hunch.

The latest American to come down with it was just "splashed with something".

Something is off here. I doubt all the people infected are walking around with obvious cuts in an area in which they are specifically there to deal with Ebola.
This post was edited on 10/3/14 at 12:54 pm
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32876 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:00 pm to
I agree. I don't think it's a wildfire like many are afraid of but I also think it spreads too easily to be THAT difficult to contract.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32876 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:03 pm to
Ok. So they are now moving the quarantined family to another location. Now they will be forcibly held outside of their home.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51897 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

The latest American to come down with it was just "splashed with something".



Link? Not out of doubt, I am interested on keeping abreast with information.

quote:

Something is off here. I doubt all the people infected are walking around with obvious cuts in an area in which they are specifically there to deal with Ebola.



Oh, it doesn't take that.

But a lot of people have horrible habits, and I am counting Americans in that.


Most probably won't admit to it but how many times do you lick your fingers after eating finger food and just go about your day? Maybe throw in a "cleaning" step of wiping the spit on your pants?

Conversely, how many wash their hands before eating?

In any case, what I just described is accurate, just misleading. The qualifiers of no cuts, ulcers, or gingivitis excludes a high portion of adults, even in the West. The point to illustrate the necessity of blood contact for the virus. Mere exposure is insufficient.
This post was edited on 10/3/14 at 1:15 pm
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57279 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Link? Not out of doubt, I am interested on keeping abreast with information.


It's breaking news on Drudge today

LINK
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51897 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

I doubt all the people infected


And again...all 10,000 of them.


In the US alone there have been 50,000 new infections of HIV in the past year.


So where are these perceptions of highly contagious comes from?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51897 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

“At one point he was trying to help decontaminate a car. He had most of the protective gear on, but he thinks something might have splashed on his body at that point. That’s one possibility, but really, one doesn’t know fully,” Diana said.



Ehhhhh.




Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54206 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Now they will be forcibly held outside of their home.


Rightfully so. The family was told not to leave home or send their kids to school. They did both. Look where that got them.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89496 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

So where are these perceptions of highly contagious comes from?


Where the virus is born and spread no doubt contributes to this. I'm probably guilty of it, myself.

However, comparing public health policy between Liberia (for example) and the United States is like comparing the late 20th/early 21st Century with the fictional 23rd/24th Centuries of the Star Trek universe, medicine-wise.
This post was edited on 10/3/14 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51897 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 1:46 pm to
Which is part of my point.


You have 10,000 cases, almost all of them in Africa.

In a HORRIBLE public health environment. It is a literal nightmare of containment, with no resources to combat it, and the population insisting that Ebola doesn't exist and as a result they are breaking into clinics treating the patients and destroying them.

All of that....and 10,000 cases in nearly a year.





HIV, which is ONLY spread by bodily fluid to blood contact, has 5 times that in the US medical system, which is light years better.


And yet the media/people are trying to invent some bogeyman that this is more contagious than it actually is. Saying that there is no way that it can be just bodily fluid to blood contact.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89496 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

HIV, which is ONLY spread by bodily fluid to blood contact, has 5 times that in the US medical system, which is light years better.


I guess it is different models of infection. HIV shows not outward signs, sometimes for decades. Generally, Ebola resembles other disease processes, in just a few days, but people pick up on it once there is an outbreak. And yet, still it spreads.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram