Started By
Message

re: Christian Artists Could Be Fined, Jailed for Refusing to Make Gay Wedding Cards

Posted on 12/7/16 at 4:21 pm to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

I don't think about homosexuals at all when I'm not engaging in a discussion like this one or don't have them in eyesight on television.
(Who are you trying to convince?)
quote:

The right to gay cakes and cards is not in the Constitution
Not what I'm talking about. Equal treatment and due process are constitutional rights. That prevents the states from using a person's sex/gender as a qualification for signing a marriage certificate.
quote:

freedom of religious belief and expression is.
A person has this inalienable right. A business has this right if the state says it does; for now, that isn't the case.
quote:

BOR will uphold the rights of business owners to operate their businesses without violating their consciences.
This is not in the BOR.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 4:23 pm to
quote:


it's actually written into the Constitution that the gub-mint shall not infringe on my ability to practice my religion

Running a business and the practicing of a religion are not to be conflated. They are separate things. Conflating the two so that you can violate the rights of others will not work.
quote:

can you maybe link up where in the Constitution that Nancies are guaranteed to purchase anyone's creative expression?

No, and that isn't what I'm arguing.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41669 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

(Who are you trying to convince?)
No one. This is a discussion forum and I'm having a discussion. I made this statement in response to you. Unless you suffer from a reading comprehension problem or are just continuing to troll, you should understand this.

quote:

Not what I'm talking about. Equal treatment and due process are constitutional rights. That prevents the states from using a person's sex/gender as a qualification for signing a marriage certificate.
There are limits to equal treatment and due process since those don't apply in every possible situation. The definition of marriage is important here and I strongly disagree with the SCOTUS' ruling on the subject. It would be nice to get that overturned but I doubt it will happen. The damage has been done. That's in regards to gay marriage, though. Cakes and Cards are a different matter as no one has a right to a cake or card and businesses should be able to choose how they operate and who they serve, especially in regards to religious convictions, which are specifically protected.

quote:

A person has this inalienable right. A business has this right if the state says it does; for now, that isn't the case.
And that's why discussion is needed. That's also why justices need to be appointed who are activists.

quote:

This is not in the BOR.
The BOR are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. Religious liberty is protected by the 1st of these.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

Religious liberty
Protected.

quote:

the rights of business owners to operate their businesses without violating their consciences.
Not protected.
Posted by crazyatthecamp
Member since Nov 2006
2100 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:35 pm to
Haven't had time to read the whole thread.
My take:
Business should not be forced to celebrate gay weddings. They are an occasion.
Serve everybody? Ok. Serve every occasion? No way.
Gay person wants a birthday card ? Cool.
Straight person wants a happy abortion card? No.
Black person wants a merry Christmas card ? Of course
Christian mom wants a happy divorce card? No.

Now some will say marriage is marriage and can't be separate from gay marriage. I disagree completely.

Posted by crazyatthecamp
Member since Nov 2006
2100 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:42 am to
What is silly is you forcing celebration of controversial occasions.

Trying to legislate celebration.

Think about that
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41669 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Not protected.
The Hobby Lobby decision allowed for commercial exemption based on religious belief. While the ruling was limited in scope, it shows the possibility of future rulings where businesses can claim religious liberty against government mandates.

Point being that just because you run a business doesn't mean you should have to give up all of your religious beliefs and convictions.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

What is silly is you forcing celebration of controversial occasions.

Made up.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Point being that just because you run a business doesn't mean you should have to give up all of your religious beliefs and convictions.
Nobody ever said otherwise.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41669 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Nobody ever said otherwise.
Actually a lot of people are saying otherwise. A lot of people are saying that if you run a business that is open to the public, you should leave your religious beliefs at home and provide service to anyone and everyone "equally" regardless of how you feel about them or what they are requesting.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

A lot of people are saying that if you run a business that is open to the public, you should leave your religious beliefs at home
Nobody is saying that.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13536 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Liberals have been pushing the GLBT Lifestyle on everyone as 'the norm', except it isn't to many Americans, especially those who have a religious objection to it.


How come I never hear of Muslim business owners having to deal with this shite.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:43 pm to
quote:


How come I never hear of Muslim business owners having to deal with this shite.
Maybe they follow the law.

In another thread it was shown that American Muslims are more comfortable with marriage equality than evangelical Christians are.
This post was edited on 12/8/16 at 12:44 pm
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

How come I never hear of Muslim business owners having to deal with this shite.


Because the checkout person at the local convenience store or the nearest Boost Mobile telephone store doesn't care about the customer enough to find out if they are gay or not?
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13536 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

quote:

How come I never hear of Muslim business owners having to deal with this shite.
Maybe they follow the law.

In another thread it was shown that American Muslims are more comfortable with marriage equality than evangelical Christians are.




Is that before or after they toss them off a rooftop?
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 1:38 pm to
quote:


Is that before or after they toss them off a rooftop?
What an insanely stupid and ignorant response.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64654 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 1:44 pm to
Is the govt going to monitor all card companies to insure the equality of this measure if enforced.

On the real note here, why is it that these folks keep trying to make Christians do things for them. What is it they seek? Christians do not believe in their chosen life style and they know this. Why the surge to force people to do their wants and needs when they can easily get someone of the same belief system to do it?
This post was edited on 12/8/16 at 1:51 pm
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41669 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Nobody is saying that.
The fact that several Christian-owned businesses have been fined and even driven out of business because they brought their religion to work (specifically in regards to gay marriage) is evidence to the contrary. A lot of people are cool with religion until it gets in the way of what someone else wants to do, and then they tell the business owner to leave it out or pay the legal consequences.

It's correction that is needed from the SCOTUS.
This post was edited on 12/8/16 at 2:19 pm
Posted by Topisawtiger
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3488 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 3:11 pm to
Thank you for the straightforward answer sir. I understand this premise, but what if it is a very old ruling or just a really bad one. That is when it bothers me. Why keep using it as a standard? Seems like it can be a flawed way of doing business.
Anyway, thanks again.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

The fact that several Christian-owned businesses have been fined and even driven out of business because they brought their religion to work
Ahem--Broke the law.
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram