Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Sprint will "cut your cell bill in half" for ATT or Verizon customers. thoughts?

Posted on 12/6/14 at 2:30 pm
Posted by Arkansas3000
Member since Jul 2014
24 posts
Posted on 12/6/14 at 2:30 pm
I know nothing about Sprint. ATT and Verizon have great coverage in Arkansas, I don't know about Sprint. Any experiences with them good or bad?
https://www.pcworld.com/article/2854000/sprint-tries-to-poach-att-and-verizon-subscribers-with-half-price-monthly-plans.html

I don't want to change but their deal is amazing -- half off current bill, forever. I don't sell back old phones and I need a new one so it's a great deal.

Or is Sprint trash in rural states like Arkansas?

How's their LTE, etc??? Compared to ATT:Verizon
This post was edited on 12/6/14 at 2:32 pm
Posted by WavinWilly
Wavin Away in Sharlo
Member since Oct 2010
8782 posts
Posted on 12/6/14 at 4:23 pm to
Sprint has the worst coverage/network of the four
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 12/6/14 at 5:08 pm to
As a former Sprint and current Verizon customer, I think their motto should be, "Half the bill for half the coverage"
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25239 posts
Posted on 12/6/14 at 5:10 pm to
Yeah I was tempted by this, but in cutting your bill in half they'll also cut your coverage/speed in half. Couldn't make the jump.

If you really want cheap phone service, get Straight Talk(and a phone that uses either VW or ATT towers). You'll get the speed of VW/ATT, unlimited data(caps at 3GB) for $45 a month.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 12/6/14 at 5:13 pm to
I've been seriously considering straight talk, but having 3GB AT&T LTE coverage and unlimited talk/text for $45 a month just seems too good to be true. Been wondering what the catch is, other than no more subsidized phones.
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25239 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:45 pm to
I had it and it was nice. The one issue I held with it was the voicemail setup. It's the old age "press 1 to save, 2 to delete" bullcrap. It's a minor issue for the price, but still annoyed me when my phone was made to do more.

Most any complaint I've seen about ST came from people using a phone on Sprints towers. Well that and how badly they cap you after 3GB.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 1:11 pm to
Can you forward your number to Google Voice and use that for visual voicemail?
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 1:52 pm to
Thoughts? You don't save as much as they say, and you get what you pay for.

LINK

quote:

Sometimes the PR lines companies have to walk when trying to keep investors from thinking you're giving away the store -- while trying to convince consumers you are -- can be somewhat amusing. Case in point is Sprint CFO Joe Euteneuer, who told attendees this week of a Merril Lynch conference that the half off promo will probably only net consumers around a 20% savings:

quote:

"They are still probably getting a 20 percent sort of net discount,” CFO Joe Euteneuer said at a Merrill Lynch conference on Tuesday. But, he added, many customers may find that Sprint’s existing rate plans are actually cheaper than the current promotion. Euteneuer’s comments are part of the dance that cellphone executives do — touting huge savings to lure new customers, while reassuring investors that these promotions will not eat too deeply into profitability.


Euteneuer's math originates with the fact that you're likely paying Sprint more, since to get the deal users have to lease a new phone or pay installments on the full cost of a new phone. While 20% is nothing to sneeze at, you're also getting significantly worse overall coverage -- and slower top LTE speeds (for the moment) -- than you'll see with either AT&T or Verizon.
This post was edited on 12/7/14 at 1:53 pm
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56011 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 7:16 am to
Sprint has the worst coverage and the way I remember it the data was barely usable but that was 3G only. Don't switch even to save money.
Posted by Arkansas3000
Member since Jul 2014
24 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 1:58 pm to
great responses, thanks all around. sounds like it is not great savings for far inferior coverage/speed. Too good to be true. I'll pass !!
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33897 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

I've been seriously considering straight talk, but having 3GB AT&T LTE coverage and unlimited talk/text for $45 a month just seems too good to be true. Been wondering what the catch is, other than no more subsidized phones.


IF you have to deal with customer service it's a fricking nightmare. If you can handle basic APN settings or unlocking (if needed) you shouldn't have any problems.

Some areas I'll get as much as 15 down on LTE.

ETA:

Like Buckeye said, when you get throttled you shouldn't even bother trying to get on the internet. Way slower than dial up.
This post was edited on 12/8/14 at 5:04 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram