Started By
Message
locked post

2nd health care worker tests positive for Ebola at Dallas hospital

Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:12 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123951 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:12 am
quote:

CNN

2nd health care worker tests positive for Ebola at Dallas hospital

By Holly Yan, CNN
updated 6:06 AM EDT, Wed October 15, 2014


A second health care worker at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital who cared for Thomas Eric Duncan has tested positive for Ebola, the state's health department said Wednesday.

The worker reported a fever Tuesday and was immediately isolated, health department spokeswoman Carrie Williams said.

The preliminary Ebola test was done late Tuesday at the state public health laboratory in Austin, and the results came back around midnight. A second test will be conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

LINK
CDC says . . . . wait for it . . . . it is not surprised
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29491 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:16 am to
quote:

Ebola can only be transmitted when an infected person shows symptoms.


I'm starting to doubt this.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:20 am to
quote:

I'm starting to doubt this.



Why is that?
Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:25 am to
Thanks Obama!!! This is just one in a long line of the fiascos of this incompetent administration!!!

It could have been stopped....with a ban on people from infected countries....that is irrefutable!!

Stupid fricking liberals!!!!
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111546 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:25 am to
quote:

I'm starting to doubt this.

I'm not sure we have as good a handle on this disease as we think we do, but having two healthcare workers who cared for a symptomatic person testing positive for the disease isn't demonstrating that.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123951 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:49 am to
quote:

having two healthcare workers who cared for a symptomatic person testing positive for the disease isn't demonstrating that.
Well, there is a slight difference in the protocols for CDC workers handling Ebola in controlled settings at the CDC . . . .




. . . versus the CDC's recommended protocol for US healthcare workers handling Ebola within an environment of explosive diarrhea, projectile vomit, and a bleeding dying patient . . . .



Geaux Figure!
Posted by Al Dante
Member since Mar 2013
1859 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:51 am to
quote:

I'm not sure we have as good a handle on this disease as we think we do, but having two healthcare workers who cared for a symptomatic person testing positive for the disease isn't demonstrating that.



It demonstrates to me that maybe something is wrong with the protocols. Perhaps nobody broke them, they're just not effective for some reason.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73146 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 5:51 am to
quote:

Thanks Obama
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
7918 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:07 am to
It is now obvious that Texas Pres. had exactly zero business handling ebola cases. While the numbers are low and manageable all those infected need to be taken to Omaha or Atlanta where the staffs are trained for this.
This post was edited on 10/15/14 at 6:10 am
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25485 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:07 am to
The truth is the CDC is downplaying the risk so the public isn't over reacting to the risk.

Anyone comparing Ebola to HIV, SARS, or swine flu is a little uninformed, intentionally.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:12 am to
Protocols will fix this.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98888 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:15 am to
Protocols are a bitch...
Posted by TigerTattle
Out of Town
Member since Sep 2007
6623 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:17 am to
quote:

Ebola can only be transmitted when an infected person shows symptoms.

I'm starting to doubt this.
Even if so, how many people know immediately when they have a fever? How many surfaces do they touch/people do they interact with before they do realize it? Rub an eye, have an itchy nose, then touch an ATM keypad, handle money, put something back on the shelf at a grocery store? Sneeze or cough around other people? And I think all of us know at least one person who can't seem to speak without spraying spit everywhere.

Those working around an Ebola patient are probably checking frequently for a fever or symptoms the rest of us, not knowing we'd been exposed to a risk, would shrug off.

The protocol in hospitals isn't working 100%, but the workers there have more protection than the general public. If this disease ever infects someone outside the hospital setting I think it could easily run rampant in a hurry.
Posted by TDFreak
Dodge Charger Aficionado
Member since Dec 2009
7373 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:18 am to
quote:

Thanks Obama!!!


No, thanks Thomas Eric Duncan! The man lied his way into the USA...and I argue he would have done the same under President Romney. He thought only of himself and has put many more lives at risk - including his friends who kept him at their apartment.
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9246 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:18 am to
We need to designate certain hospitals to handle any and all cases of suspected Ebola. This is getting serious. I mean, they keep telling us that Ebola is a very very low risk of contracting and yet two health care workers who by all accounts did everything they were taught, have now contracted this virus. I am really starting to wonder about the fluid only based transmition theory. It is a virus and viruses evolve. Im thinking that this thing is beyond fluid based transmition. This is absolutely a world issue now. Nobody is safe! Possible 10,000 new cases per week? How can any country or agency control that? I hope to god these "experts" know what they are talking about?



One more question, wasnt there a couple of leading scientist on Ebola that were killed on the plane that was shot down in the Ukraine?
This post was edited on 10/15/14 at 6:20 am
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:22 am to
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33017 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:22 am to
I'm not either. Once we found out there were 70+ people who cared for Duncan & they didn't even know how the healthcare workers were exposed, it descending a matter of time. I hope there aren't too many more.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123951 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:23 am to
quote:

The truth is the CDC is downplaying the risk
quote:

On July 21, Frieden said that “Ebola poses little risk to the U.S. general population.” Any advanced hospital in the country has the capacity to isolate a patient, he said. “There is nothing particularly special about the isolation of an Ebola patient"
He appears before a Congressional Committee tomorrow.

Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:24 am to
quote:

No, thanks Thomas Eric Duncan! T
exactly, glad the fricker is dead.
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16930 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 6:24 am to
Rather novel spin right there. It would have been Mitt Romney's fault.

Seems legit!
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram