Started By
Message

O Line Play tomfoolery

Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:07 pm
Posted by Jeffreylebowski
bfegypt
Member since Dec 2012
368 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:07 pm
No O Line plays well against 8-9 in box. Can we emphasize that again? Enough with O Line play hasn't been great this year commentary. Teams in box bad, teams out of box good.
Posted by PacWilly
Member since Jun 2010
552 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:12 pm to
If we keep repeating this over and over, maybe it will become true.

What you are also missing is that when they have 8-9 in the box, we also have 9-10 offensive players on the line or in the backfield, which is plenty of players to block with. I'm not ready to give up on our Oline, but they have yet to really play well either.
Posted by mikedatyger
Orlandeaux, FL
Member since Jun 2005
4010 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:13 pm to
So, let me get this straight ....
1) No O Line plays well against 8-9 in box.
2) Teams in box bad.

So what does that mean when you still line up in jumbo formation and run up the middle in those situations?
An occasional audible would be nice, just sayin'.
Posted by CRAZY 4 LSU
Member since Apr 2006
16903 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:13 pm to
The problem is our formations. Too much congestion when we have a fullback and one wideout. The other team will essentially have 10 in the box
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:15 pm to
No more tomfoolery? No more balleywho?
Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
31676 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Jeffreylebowski


get a job lebowski
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:17 pm to
perhaps it just should be condensed to say our OL is not opening any holes for our RB's. the other teams front 7 is hitting our RB's at the line of scrimmage and our QB has no time to make progressions because an opposing player is in his face right after the snap.

we don't know who's at fault but pretty sure someone on our team is not blocking these guys.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
39978 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:19 pm to
WHERE'S THE MONEY, SHITHEAD
Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24560 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:22 pm to
Man, that rug really tied the room together.
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11651 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

we also have 9-10 offensive players on the line or in the backfield

So the fullback and running back block on those plays also? What happens when the running back gets the ball? He blocking for himself also?

I guess the QB blocks too, right?
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 4:25 pm
Posted by tlsu15
Capital of Texas
Member since Aug 2011
10010 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Jeffreylebowski



When going into threads you start

Posted by lsuguru
Lake Charles
Member since Aug 2007
1782 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

No O Line plays well against 8-9 in box.


And yet we continue to try and run the ball 75% of the game. This is what frustrates me about Miles!
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38215 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:31 pm to
It just depends on how aggressive they are blocking and the play at hand. Go watch the Auburn game last year on Hill's long runs against loaded boxes. It's also notable that Fanaika is not up to speed. Most of the running plays called have been to the right, just wait until they start running off the left tackle.
Posted by sjmabry
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
18495 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

The problem is our formations. Too much congestion when we have a fullback and one wideout. The other team will essentially have 10 in the box
LSU will play physical football and take its shots when they are presented. IIRC, the play action to Dural in the SHSU game was out of the I formation. The plays are in the playbook, and will be brought out at the best time for the team to achieve victory.
Posted by BobBarker
Bompton
Member since Nov 2012
11657 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:37 pm to
One thing I noticed is that the oline rarely gets pushed into the backfield, but they also rarely push DL into the second level. I think this has a lot to do with the size of our guards. They're huge and are great for holding their ground, but they can't get their pad level low enough to destroy DL off the ball on a consistent basis. That's why I'm really excited about Brumfield and Clapp. They're both plenty big, but they still have great pad level.
Posted by bulldogger
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
2094 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Jeffreylebowski


oh good lord. it's about push and not getting needed yardage.
Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24560 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:41 pm to
Shut the frick up, Donny.
Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24560 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:43 pm to
Dude, this is a league game, this determines who enters the next round robin. Am I wrong? Am I wrong?
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 5:10 pm to
yea it is hard to block when 8 or 9 guys are in the box and our tightends can't do a damn thing and our full back is useless. The problem has been on the play calling end. The power sets aren't working at all, we dominate when we go 3 wide and force a nickel.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12222 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 5:12 pm to
Don't be fatuous, Jeffrey.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram