- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It's time to ban dog deer hunting
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:04 pm to Langston
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:04 pm to Langston
If you believe that something like that would occur or even be taken seriously, then you need to step back and get some perspective. The entire ridiculousness of it was to show that at some point, laws will get passed that will address the problem. If dog hunters aren't progressive thinking and a part of finding the solution, they will lose their sport eventually. I've hunted all my life and hold it dearly. However, like it or not, it's not a right. It can be taken away and hunters at each others throats on serious issues does nothing but weaken their overall stance when it comes under attack.
1
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:05 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
They are all my deer. I am just a very generous person.
I'm going hunting in the morning. Could you loan me a deer since you are being generous? I'm not picky, doe will be fine
TIA
I can give you an address where to deliver it if that helps
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:06 pm to Nodust
He's full of shite. He hasn't given me a deer since muzzleloader season last year and I'm his best e-friend.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:07 pm to Alahunter
quote:
If you believe that something like that would occur or even be taken seriously, then you need to step back and get some perspective
Thats why I questioned it the first time and you stood by it so dont act like you were trying to be ridiculous. Its a joke alright but it wasnt meant to be.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:08 pm to Langston
Nobody wants to tax feeders with me 
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:09 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
10 cents per grain of corn
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:10 pm to Langston
Ok. Yes, I was serious. Several hundred dollar tax on dog species, and in addition to that, a tax, on dog hunting properties only. I'm that far left. Perhaps, we could not only have a land fee on dog hunting properties, but the penalty for dogs caught on other properties, would be forfeiture of the dog hunting property to the adjoining property owners. That would eliminate any future potential problems, since that landowner would have shown he is incapable of leasing to responsible individuals.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:13 pm to Alahunter
I still want to tax your feeders. $250 a feeder.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:13 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I have no problem with that. I don't use feeders.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:13 pm to Monticello
quote:
quote:
You people who are crying for a banning need to sit down and really think about what you'll be doing by signing that ban.
Making my 250 acres that I paid for with my own sweat and blood actually huntable without constant interference from my neighbors with 100 acres?
Sounds like you should have done better due diligence. They dog hunted in that area long before you bought property, didnt they.
if so do you believe everyone should lose there dog hunting privilages just because you started hunting the area.
I do agree that they should have at least a 1000ac
and someone attempting to dog hunt 100ac is an idiot
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:15 pm to Alahunter
quote:
, but the penalty for dogs caught on other properties, would be forfeiture of the dog hunting property to the adjoining property owners.
At least that has something to do with this conversation.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:15 pm to Alahunter
Seriously? You have no problem with taxing feeders? Or dogs?
Hell lets have a tax for every time I take a shite in the woods.
Hell lets have a tax for every time I take a shite in the woods.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:16 pm to greasemonkey
quote:
Sounds like you should have done better due diligence. They dog hunted in that area long before you bought property, didnt they.
if so do you believe everyone should lose there dog hunting privilages just because you started hunting the area.
Thats a great point thats been avoided.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:17 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Absolutely. Langston said I was, and it wasn't an over the top suggestion to prove a point. Dead serious.
No need for when you do. However, there would need to be an environmental fee for your dogs if they did, seeing as you are responsible for anything they leave behind.
No need for when you do. However, there would need to be an environmental fee for your dogs if they did, seeing as you are responsible for anything they leave behind.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:18 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Absolutely. Langston said I was
No you did
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:19 pm to Alahunter
Ohhhh you got me good you slick bastard
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:20 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Nobody wants to tax feeders with me
I'm with you. My feeder ain't produced shite. I'm taking it down when it's empty.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:22 pm to Nodust
quote:
I'm with you. My feeder ain't produced shite. I'm taking it down when it's empty.
Not the best time for that yet. Wait another month.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:23 pm to Langston
Anyway back on subject.
I wish I could take these angry folks on a dog hunt and change their opinions of it.
I wish I could take these angry folks on a dog hunt and change their opinions of it.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 12:25 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Free dog hunt in the basin...Im game never had the opportunity to hunt there. Your such a generous man...Thanks
Page 27 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News