Started By
Message
locked post

NYT: If Texas A&M Is the SEC’s 13th Team, Who’s No. 14?

Posted on 8/25/11 at 8:07 am
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 8:07 am
Doesn't really discuss 14, but has some key info:
quote:

As for when Texas A&M will move, the probable answer is soon but not imminent. If it were to join the SEC for the 2012-13 academic year, it would have to make the move by early fall in order for the move to be logistically feasible.

A high-ranking SEC official said he did not expect any movement on Texas A&M within the next week, because he said the university was busy working out the legal issues involved with leaving the Big 12.

“They have to unencumber themselves from the Big 12,” the official said.

There have been some recent voices opposing the move, including from Vanderbilt, but it does not appear that enough resistance has been built up to prevent it from happening.

“I think it’s a matter of timing and substance,” the SEC official said. “Who is it and when is it done? I don’t think the SEC has any strong opinion against expansion. Likewise, we’re not under any pressure to expand.”


quote:

The official acknowledged that because of the length and structure of the SEC’s current television contract, adding Texas A&M and a 14th member would not be financially beneficial from a rights standpoint.

Texas A&M and Team No. 14 are expected to receive a pro rata share equal to what the SEC’s 12 current universities are making: an average of about $18 million in league payouts. (Individual universities can make more money from their separate television deals.)

The SEC deal, which ends in 2025, has a few windows when it can be renegotiated but no one from the SEC or the networks expects any radical change.

So the notion that Texas A&M will see a significant financial gain by going to the SEC is not true. While the SEC offers more long-term security, the Big 12 could end up with a television deal in four years that surpasses the annual payout of the SEC, according to Joel Lulla, a New York-based lawyer who is the Big 12’s television consultant. Starting next season, A&M is guaranteed $20 million of total revenue from the Big 12. Once the Big 12 negotiates its deal that expires in four years, Texas A&M would be poised to make more money. Texas A&M also has to deal with a potentially significant buyout that will be in the neighborhood of $15 million.

“Economically, unless the SEC opens their TV deals to the extent where they make more than a pro rata increase, it makes no sense at all,” Lulla said.

If Texas A&M is the SEC's 13th Team, Who's No. 14?
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19704 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 8:27 am to
quote:

While the SEC offers more long-term security, the Big 12 could end up with a television deal in four years that surpasses the annual payout of the SEC, according to Joel Lulla, a New York-based lawyer who is the Big 12’s television consultant


Be interesting to see what network will essentially pay for Oklahoma/Texas game coupled with a lot of games that are equivalent to watching Conference USA.
Posted by rileytiger
In Hamster Cage Running on Wheel
Member since Feb 2007
2030 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 8:42 am to
quote:

If Texas A&M is the only move, Armageddon is avoided temporarily,” said an athletic director in a Bowl Championship Series conference, who spoke on condition of anonymity.



quote:

A high-ranking SEC official said he did not expect any movement on Texas A&M within the next week, because he said the university was busy working out the legal issues involved with leaving the Big 12.


quote:

Big 12 could end up with a television deal in four years that surpasses the annual payout of the SEC


I am smelling BS on this whole article. Too many loose ends and the last quote does not make any sense.
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 8:52 am to
quote:

the last quote does not make any sense.

What doesn't make sense? It just means that the SEC didn't foresee the future and give themselves enough triggers for renogotiation. Don't have a clue if it's true, but it's certainly plausible.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:39 am to
quote:

There have been some recent voices opposing the move, including from Vanderbilt,

Vandy???

Those freeloaders need to shut up and sit down.
Posted by rileytiger
In Hamster Cage Running on Wheel
Member since Feb 2007
2030 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:42 am to
I just don't get an article where someone writes and makes all of these claims with "So-Called" sources. I mean I can go ask my neighbor a question and then call him an official on the SEC. Likewise the Big 12 has the worst TV contract out of all the major conferences (aTm hardly gets airtime unless they are playing a top 25 team and I live in Houston) so I do not see how they stand to make more money than the most watched and talked about conference in college football.
Posted by Hubbhogg
Fayettechill
Member since Dec 2010
13433 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Vandy???

Those freeloaders need to shut up and sit down


Yeah WTF? Do they even get to speak at conference AD meetings

Fix your damn basketball court frickers
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:47 am to
quote:

the Big 12 could end up with a television deal in four years that surpasses the annual payout of the SEC, according to Joel Lulla, a New York-based lawyer who is the Big 12’s television consultant.


Dont se that happening. The SEC is the premier college football leauge and will get even more money in TV contracts in time.

Posted by Smoke Ring
Scenic Highway Crackhouse
Member since Dec 2010
4240 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:49 am to
quote:

according to Joel Lulla, a New York-based lawyer who is the Big 12’s television consultant




Are you kidding me, New York Times? Asking the losing conference's media advisor to wax poetic on the SEC and what Mike Slive will be able to do?

Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33659 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 10:53 am to
quote:

, the Big 12 could


yeah...."could" - pure speculation. Alot of shite "could" happen

and from what I've read the author of this article grossly underplays these contract "windows"

I understand this window gives both the SEC and ESPN opportunities to modify the contract and opens up legal avenues for each if the other party does not agree to renegotiate terms.

the same "window" also allows ESPN to lower the terms of the deal if by somehow the SEC lost teams. So, it's in ESPN's best interest to play nice in the good faith of the contract
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 10:54 am
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:03 am to
This is kinda playing out like I thought it would. I think the SEC will add A&M as a 13th and hold tight for another year or two before adding VaTech. That's the only move that makes sense right now.

I think we are getting TF out of the bevo 10, conference or no. SEC is not under any pressure to take A&M, but the FudgePac 12 would definitely add A&M, and big 10 probably would. SEC would make the move and add A&M to prevent realignment with another conference (not that we're "all that," but this is the best way to expand TV footprint and all conferences know it).
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33659 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:14 am to
quote:

I think the SEC will add A&M as a 13th and hold tight for another year or two

I agree completely

I have a difficult time believing there's this mad dash to balance out the conference immediately or that the lack of a 14th team is going to hinder the process. It'll be very high on their priority list to find that 14th team, but to deny A&M based solely on that would be extremely short-sighted.
Posted by Touchdowns4LSU
Baghdad On The Bayou
Member since Oct 2004
7524 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:35 am to
quote:

This is kinda playing out like I thought it would. I think the SEC will add A&M as a 13th and hold tight for another year or two before adding VaTech. That's the only move that makes sense right now.
Taking a fourth tier football program in Texas (you come after UT, Tech and TCU) is a huge risk to the SEC if a 14th is not selected. The unbalanced divisions would cause all kinds of problems.

I really have mixed feelings. I want LSU to beat aggy every year but I see no reason to dilute the SEC money pot for something that could be scheduled as non-conference.
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Taking a fourth tier football program in Texas (you come after UT, Tech and TCU) is a huge risk to the SEC if a 14th is not selected. The unbalanced divisions would cause all kinds of problems.

Nice troll. Check the standings last year.
Posted by Smoke Ring
Scenic Highway Crackhouse
Member since Dec 2010
4240 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

I really have mixed feelings. I want LSU to beat aggy every year but I see no reason to dilute the SEC money pot for something that could be scheduled as non-conference.


You have to be pretty damn gullible to believe a NY Times writer when he says no extra money will come the SEC's way. Especially when his source is the Big 12's media consultant.

Commissioner Slive isn't going to add A&M, and the SEC members would never accept A&M, if it diluted their money share. And they haven't maintained America's greatest conference by making poor business decisions.
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:39 pm to
Touchdowns4LSU sounds like a Kloset Klanhorn.
Posted by Touchdowns4LSU
Baghdad On The Bayou
Member since Oct 2004
7524 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Nice troll. Check the standings last year.


Check my number of posts on here and then come back with troll again, troll.

GTFOH
Posted by CassiusClay
Member since Aug 2011
727 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

touchdowns4lsu

Get your head checked. Something isn't right with it.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/26/11 at 9:13 am to
quote:

a fourth tier football program in Texas (you come after UT, Tech and TCU)


No. aTm will come into the SEC at about the same level LSU was at pre-Saban. And with the right coach they have just as much potential to turn into a national power. They have the talent pool, fans and facilites. And yes, I think they will recruit with Texas head to head. A lot of kids will choose a guaranteed game against Bama, Auburn, LSU, Arkansas and VaTech/FSU every year instead of having only 1 marquee matchup in the nations 5th best conference.
This post was edited on 8/26/11 at 9:21 am
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33659 posts
Posted on 8/26/11 at 9:16 am to
I hate to say this, but as this stretches out, I have a gut feeling it's going to be Mizzou

not my first choice
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram