re: Would u pay 17 extra cents a gallon if you knew that 100% went to roads and bridges?

quote:

---

if you knew that 100% went to roads and bridges?

---

That's a common deceptive practice of governments whose people have no concept of the fungibility of money.

Step 1: Vote for this measure, and all the money will go to this popular program, says the government.

Step 2: People vote for it, the measure generates X dollars in revenue.

Step 3: Legislature cuts X dollars from the existing funding to the program.

Step 4: Revenues of X dollars from the new measure are then allocated to the program, with legislators claiming they've kept their promise that the money would go to that program even though total funding for the program is exactly the same as it was before.

Step 5: Legislature now has X dollars of unrestricted revenue (which it cut from the previous funding for the program) to spend on whatever it wants.

Step 6: Profit.

Nope........ Don't trust JBE or any of him pals.

Does anyone in this thread know how the transportation trust fund works? The portion of the gas tax that DOTD receives currently goes into the fund. It cannot be used for anything else (i.e. "lining politicians pockets"). The state police can tap into it, but thanks to the voters a couple of years ago, the amount was significantly limited.

So an increase in the gas tax that is dedicated to roads and bridges would go directly into the transportation trust fund, which, constitutionally, can only be used for transportation.

Haha..nope

LINK

Correct FightnTiger. After that, the people voted to cap the amount that could be used by the state police.

The state police issue was pointed out in his post. Not exactly the "gotcha moment" you were going for

quote:

---

Would u pay 17 extra cents a gallon if you knew that 100% went to roads and bridges?Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:34 pm

---

Who's Brother in law gets the inflated contracts?

quote:

---

no "dedicated" fund has ever remained dedicated. Most do not even make 10 years as "dedicated" funds.

---

The whole idea of a "dedicated" fund is pretty much a myth. Money is fungible. About the only guarantee you get with a dedicated fund is that it sets the minimum level of funding for whatever program it's dedicated to. Other funding for that program can always be cut to free up the same amount of money the dedicated fund is generating for it, so the program gets no additional funding and an amount of money equal to what the fund generates is available to the government to spend as it wants.

Shouldn't our president be helping us?

quote:

---

Does anyone in this thread know how the transportation trust fund works? The portion of the gas tax that DOTD receives currently goes into the fund. It cannot be used for anything else (i.e. "lining politicians pockets"). The state police can tap into it, but thanks to the voters a couple of years ago, the amount was significantly limited.

So an increase in the gas tax that is dedicated to roads and bridges would go directly into the transportation trust fund, which, constitutionally, can only be used for transportation.

---

I am usually in the camp of the "slash it" mentality. But people don't realize how far fuel efficiency has come since the 1980's when we last raised the gas tax. Vehicles now need far less fuel, and combine that with inflation and the rising costs to maintain and build roads/bridges, the gas tax's value has significantly decreased.

Nearly every state has raised it's gas tax since Louisiana last raised theirs. I understand the public's skepticism about government mis-allocating the funds, but something desperately needs to be done to fund our projects.