Started By
Message

re: When does someone no longer have the right to work? (Oregon State pitcher related)

Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:20 pm to
You're arguing that he will never be hired because of public backlash. That's not a fact. It's crazy talk.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59078 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

What prevents him from doing what he's best qualified to do if someone offers him that job? Nothing, but then what's the point of the thread? I'm not quite sure

That's not true the "mob" is preventing him from getting a job.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35346 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:22 pm to
Why don't you hire him?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110701 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

An employer might he willing to hire him but won't for fear of public back lash. We can't have an honest conversation if we don't acknowledge that fact. Simply saying they have the right to not hire him or not do business with someone that does is not facing reality that he has to do something with the rest of his life. So we can imprison him for life with no parole, which seems cruel given his age at the time of the crime and counter productive since someone with no chance of getting out has no incentive to behave. We can make him a ward if the state which also seems wasteful and counter productive or allow him to move on with his life.

What exactly is your solution?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110701 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

That's not true
What's not true? If someone offers him a job, nothing is preventing him from doing that job. What part of that is not true?
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59078 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

You're arguing that he will never be hired because of public backlash. That's not a fact. It's crazy talk.


Fair enough but there are several in this thread that at least seem ok with that and also an assumption by some that he's a danger to repeat offend, even though as far as we know he only did it one time to one child.

Btw Several have mockingly said he should flip burgers. Clearly they say that because it's a low skill, low pay job, but don't most McDonalds have play grounds? Wouldn't you be more likely to be around kids daily at there then a baseball park, at least more young girls? (From my understanding most repeat molesters don't molest just any kids but stick with the same gender, so a guy that molested a little girl would be unlikely to molest the 12y/o bat boy. So if the goal is to keep him away from kids, seems fast food is not as good a place for him to work as baseball or roofing.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56385 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

This might be more suited elsewhere.

When does a "criminal" lose the right to work?

In this guy's case, he's been punished, theoretically rehabilitated and if experts deem him no longer a threat to children, why should he not be able to work in his chosen profession, assuming that profession doesn't put children in danger?



Your problem is that you are looking at this in a vacuum and only considering the individual. This isn't a case where someone is making as single subjective decision that this kid doesn't deserve to work. Instead, those that provide work are making the decision that they don't want him to work for them presumably because a significant percentage of their customers have a problem with it.

This is a "bleeding heart" problem, IMO. Many people can't accept the fact that, bad things happen and some of them can never be forgiven or excused (even if someone does time for it). It's just a terrible situation that doesn't get better with time. Nobody wants that to be the case. But, the cure for your heartache isn't to force others into reacting the way that they do to the situation. You just need to accept the realities of the situation. Ignoring the damage he did to others, he also "ruined" his own life when he was very young. There are many ways to do this. He did it.

Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27169 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:34 pm to
But everyone has the right not to hire him.

No one is saying he can't play baseball. However all the teams in MLB choose to say baseball elsewhere.
Posted by rd280z
Richmond
Member since Jan 2007
2304 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:39 pm to
The scouts and GM's might think he has lots of talent but the baggage he brings is enormous and detrimental to the organizations reputation.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:53 pm to
The employer has the right to hire whoever he feels is best for his business.

The employer also has the right to take into account their customers opinions of that hires.

And customers have a right to voice their displeasure on said hire.


If you think the guy has a right to be a MLB pitcher then buy a franchise and sign him.
This post was edited on 6/15/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 12:59 pm to
One always has the right to work.

One never has the right to get paid for it, only the opportunity to try.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

most repeat molesters don't molest just any kids but stick with the same gender so a guy that molested a little girl would be unlikely to molest the 12 y/o bat boy.


Surprisingly, the PR departments of all of these teams didn't think that was a winning talking point to give the public.
This post was edited on 6/15/17 at 1:28 pm
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44738 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

He was punished and completed his sentence. He didn't even have to register as a sex offender, so he should be extremely thankful.


Yes he did. He didn't do it on time once and that's how this story got out.

ETA: Apparently it was a frick up by the Corvallis PD that allowed this to become public. Yikes.
This post was edited on 6/15/17 at 7:32 pm
Posted by SanFranTiger
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2003
4893 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 1:58 pm to
actually that might be the BEST place for someone like that because he'll be under constant scrutinry
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20870 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Would you knowingly hire a convicted rapist to build your house when there are so many other options?



Maybe. Does he do a better job than others for the same money? If I don't have a family and the house is for me, then I might .
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10186 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:05 pm to
I don't think he's been punished (enough). I think he used his family connections to get an extremely light sentence. This was not just a one time thing. Repeated molestation over a two year period. I saw an article where the Oregon District Attorney called into a sports radio show saying that if the molestation had happened in Oregon, Heimlich would just be finishing up his prison sentence instead of playing college ball. That said, he has the right to work in a field where he is not around kids, but teams certainly have the right to not want to go anywhere near this reprobate.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48295 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Are the teams not hiring him because the teams management refuses to hire someone with a criminal record or because of public pressure?


1) It doesn't matter; and
2) its a combination of both. Management doesn't want a child molester in uniform. The reason is because it plays terrible with their fan base ultimately hurting the bottom line.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48295 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

That's not true the "mob" is preventing him from getting a job.


Who buys tickets to baseball games? Who buys jerseys? Who supports MLB sponsors?

What you call "mob," I call market force.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

cubsfan5150


you are fricking stupid


quote:

Then they can choose not to attend, then it's their prerogative.


right, a-hole. Do you think the Mariners, Marlins, or Padres want to alienate fans from their ballpark? You know, the people who provide the clubs with MONEY.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram