- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are your thoughts on population control?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:06 am to lsugrad35
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:06 am to lsugrad35
National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM200)
Our government is in on it.
quote:
The report advocates the promotion of education and contraception and other population control: "No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion."
Our government is in on it.
0
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:06 am to Kujo
quote:
couldn't we spay/neuter everyone at birth, and when you are ready to get pregnant/impregnate(married)....the government will pay for the reversal(after 18)
Would the lack of risk of pregnancy lead to greater sexual activity, and thus higher prevalence of disease?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:09 am to Napoleon
We aren't near needing that control, yet.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:09 am to notiger1997
quote:
We don't have a population problem in the US as a whole.
Not even close.
The US is 182nd out of 244 countries/territories in terms of population density.
85.35 people per square mile.
Bangladesh has 2,888.74 people per square mile. That's in-fricking-sane.
And they're only 10th on the list, although the top 9 are all really really small places like Singapore, Hong Kong, and the Vatican City.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:11 am to Kujo
quote:
couldn't we spay/neuter everyone at birth, and when you are ready to get pregnant/impregnate(married)....the government will pay for the reversal(after 18)
Our government literally runs ZERO things efficiently and effectively.
I don't need them in control of my genitals.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:11 am to Kujo
quote:
couldn't we spay/neuter everyone at birth, and when you are ready to get pregnant/impregnate(married)....the government will pay for the reversal(after 18)
no
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:12 am to lsugrad35
quote:
population control
Mother Nature has a way of always winning. Just like animals, if we become too many, a disease with no cure will decimate a large portion of the population very quickly.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:12 am to lsugrad35
I'm okay with it to a certain degree. I certainly don't think low income people should be having 4 or 5 kids in our society. But that whole argument floats into another subject (Sex education,contraceptive etc)
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:18 am to JBeam
quote:
I'm okay with it to a certain degree. I certainly don't think low income people should be having 4 or 5 kids in our society. But that whole argument floats into another subject (Sex education,contraceptive etc)
Well my question right now is more around the impacts of solving the problems that are effective population control right now. Two things that kill people right now are murder and cancer. They are effective. We all hate both of them. We all want both of them to go away. If they did we would have to introduce a new way to handle the number of people that would have been taken by those two. Or I guess as someone else said, cancer would just be replaced by something else which would have the same impact.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 9:19 am
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:20 am to lsugrad35
Carousel!
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:20 am to lsugrad35
My thoughts are they have already informed us that it will happen....
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:21 am to notiger1997
quote:
Yes the dumbasses are having more kids than the responsible people,
That is the issue.
My idea, which will get blown up:
1. Stop giving more welfare money to people who have more than 1 child.
2. Give free abortions to people on welfare in their first trimester
3. Give free birth control and condoms out with their welfare checks if they want it.
That'd be wayyy cheaper on the taxpayers than children and the amount of children born into poverty would slowly go down.
Won't be a popular opinion in the red south, but it would help tremendously IMO.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:22 am to terriblegreen
quote:
The earth will take care of population. If it gets to big, something will happen to balance it out.
Is this like the argument that a woman's body will know what to do in the event of rape and will shut that whole thing down?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:25 am to Farkwad
quote:
Mother Nature has a way of always winning
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:33 am to TheCaterpillar
I have suggested and will suggest that a semi permanent form of birth control be a condition to receive welfare. No IUD no check
Posted on 6/23/16 at 11:02 am to bobaftt1212
Lol at all the people in this thread talking about forced birth control in the US while ignoring that Africa is going to flood the world with migrants in the next 100 years
Posted on 6/23/16 at 11:03 am to terriblegreen
quote:
The earth will take care of population. If it gets to big, something will happen to balance it out.
Yep.
Earth will start losing population soon. The growth rate is already slowing.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News