Started By
Message

re: The move to legalize same-sex marriage in La. commences TODAY

Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:03 am to
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:03 am to
quote:

I am all for gays being allowed to have a union and tat union being recognized but to call that action a marriage is crazy.


So you're issue is more to do with the sanctity of the WORD "marriage" than with the actual sanctity of marriage?

You're good with two guys having a legally recognized loving relationship that has all the benefits as a heterosexual couple, so long as they don't use the WORD "marriage?"

As you said earlier...makes zero sense to me.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73142 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:04 am to
quote:

I am just saying that words mean things and we shouldn't change definitions of words just because somebody feels like doing so
words change meaning all the time. That's what happens with languages you dingus
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167141 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Because my beliefs are so looked down upon, I am forced to either hide them or risk the penalty that comes with having them.


Everyone has this to some degree so it isn't exclusive to just you.

You're not going to get sympathy from me for dealing with shite that every person in America deals with on some level.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20201 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:06 am to
I still don't understand how the government can recognize a religious ceremony if there is a separation of church and state.
Posted by Greengirl
Member since Dec 2011
5856 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:06 am to
quote:

So you're issue is more to do with the sanctity of the WORD "marriage" than with the actual sanctity of marriage?


Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:06 am to
quote:

I am just letting you know how the definition of the word came about.


The word marriage was originally used to show obligations between a woman and her husband and signify her as his property. Glad tosee the definition has never changed. Solid argument champ.
Posted by The Stash
The Boot
Member since Jan 2014
1308 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:07 am to
There is not a separation of church and state ..
Posted by Jwodie
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2009
7201 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:07 am to
quote:

I still don't understand how the government can recognize a religious ceremony if there is a separation of church and state.


The "ceremony" has nothing to do with it.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73142 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:08 am to
quote:


I still don't understand how the government can recognize a religious ceremony if there is a separation of church and state
they don't, that's why you get a marriage license signed by an officiant and it's filed at the courthouse
Posted by saderade
America's City
Member since Jul 2005
25731 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Marriage has existed throughout history as a way to regulate the obligations and responsibilities of procreation. So when you allow the union of two gays to be called a marriage, you are changing the definition so much that it is destroying the need for the institution of marriage.

Half of the children born in the country right now are born out of wedlock so this point isn't valid anymore. Words change or evolve over time.
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:08 am to
quote:

There is not a separation of church and state


Really? And which church are we using to represent the views of America?
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73142 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:09 am to
quote:

There is not a separation of church and state ..
and the troll thus revealeth himself to us
Posted by Greengirl
Member since Dec 2011
5856 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Marriage has existed throughout history as a way to regulate the obligations and responsibilities of procreation.


Yes, but it has also been used as a way to obtain influential in-laws and strengthen group ties. Stephanie Coontz has written extensively about marriage, particularly in Marriage, A History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage. Procreation is only part of what marriage has been about.

Besides, being gay or lesbian is not the same thing as being sterile.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20201 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:10 am to
There is a seperation of church a state, the state can't promote one religion over another. Marriage is a religious term, why is the government promoting it?
Posted by JOJO Hammer
Member since Nov 2010
11907 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:10 am to
The only winner in the gay marriage fight will be divorce lawyers.
Posted by TJRibMe
Houston, Mexas
Member since Sep 2004
5214 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:12 am to
quote:


You're clearly referring to your religious interpretation of the word and are grasping at straws to come up with a secular argument to support your conclusion.
I know this wasn't directed at me necessarily. However, atheists or agnostics are only going to recognize or give validity to a secular point.

As a Christian, I do believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. From a secular perspective, I've yet to find a legit study that shows that children are not best served by a traditional, healthy marriage. Yes, there are plenty of screwed up marriages between a man and a woman where children suffer. Generally speaking, a traditional marriage where both parents are committed to the family is going to produce better outcomes for the children.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Everyone has this to some degree so it isn't exclusive to just you.


To some degree, but not nearly like this. Every poll and study on this shows the same thing.

Atheists trusted on par with rapists

Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20201 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:13 am to
The "ceremony" may not have anything to do with it but the pact does
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73142 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:13 am to
quote:

I've yet to find a legit study that shows that children are not best served by a traditional, healthy marriage.
and what does this have to do with gay marriage?
Posted by Ba Ba Boooey
Northshore
Member since May 2010
4705 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:13 am to
My comment was in reference to the comment that this will force religions to carry out the ceremony
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram