Started By
Message

re: Tesla Semi could be ‘the biggest catalyst in trucking in decades’

Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:31 am to
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
25864 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:31 am to
Stock in truck stop whore pussy just plummeted.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20482 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:32 am to
quote:

can they program the damn thing to stay the frick in the right lane??


.
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:

substandard roads


So, it can drive at least 300 miles
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10967 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:35 am to
quote:

what is your main point?
Main point is there is a whole lot of hat but very little cattle in all the hype that appears to want the general populous to think all this electric/autonomous/AI vehicle technology is 'just around the corner' in order to gain political and financial traction for what very well could be only one of many different solutions to problems that may or may not be solely intrinsic...
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28704 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:37 am to
quote:

My main point is the extra weight of an electric truck versus a standard.
I'm trying to tell you that's a pretty weak point.
quote:

Look at it this way, a Chevy Malibu weight 3,100 lbs. It's about the same size as a Tesla Model S. But the Tesla weighs over 4,600 lbs.
Why would you pick a very underpowered vehicle with a tiny engine to compare to the Tesla? Why not pick something more comparable like some Mercedes model or something? The Tesla would still rip the doors off of it, but at least it would come close to packing the same power. I know why, because they're about the same weight and it doesn't fit your narrative.
quote:

That difference is huge, especially when you start talking about big trucks versus cars.
Actually, the difference could very likely be smaller when you're talking about big trucks, because a higher fraction of the weight of the vehicle is "truck" rather than battery.
quote:

Again, the heavier the truck, the less weight it can legally haul. And the less freight it can haul, the less economically feesable the truck.
Again, you're not accounting for the fact that the cost of the fuel and driver are HUGE factors in the economic feasibility of a truck. With those costs eliminated, the loads can be lighter and still be more profitable.

Though I still think you'll be surprised by the weight of these trucks.
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3977 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:41 am to
Great post. Can tell you've thought a lot about this.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110711 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Main point is there is a whole lot of hat but very little cattle in all the hype that appears to want the general populous to think all this electric/autonomous/AI vehicle technology is 'just around the corner' in order to gain political and financial traction for what very well could be only one of many different solutions to problems that may or may not be solely intrinsic...

In fairness, it IS just around the corner. Auto pilot is already here, and Tesla vehicles will be fully autonomous very soon, so again, I'm not sure what you mean.

Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64415 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:42 am to
quote:


Main point is there is a whole lot of hat but very little cattle in all the hype that appears to want the general populous to think all this electric/autonomous/AI vehicle technology is 'just around the corner' in order to gain political and financial traction for what very well could be only one of many different solutions to problems that may or may not be solely intrinsic...





No, they've got a new snake oil salesman dangling something shiny and new in their face. Nothing you say will make them think logically. It's new so it has to be good.
Posted by YumYum Sauce
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
8299 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:42 am to
quote:

I have concerns with an empty cabin dragging a fully loaded 53' van coming towards me. They will have to prove it to me.


I trust Tesla more than your average overweight, diabetic, chain smoking, caffeine chugging, amphetamine hiding truck driver.

they are literally the worst employee base in the US.
Posted by TheGasMan
Member since Oct 2014
3140 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:43 am to

Nikola on the front would be a bad arse way to market the Semi Tesla line.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110711 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:44 am to
quote:

No, they've got a new snake oil salesman dangling something shiny and new in their face. Nothing you say will make them think logically. It's new so it has to be good.

I think the sooner you realize this is definitely going to happen, the better off you'll be.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110711 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:45 am to
quote:

I trust Tesla more than your average overweight, diabetic, chain smoking, caffeine chugging, amphetamine hiding truck driver.

That's a bingo.

And again, we're talking about where Tesla is at now with the autonomous vehicle, not where they could be in 5, 10, 25 years.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25326 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Tesla Semi could be ‘the biggest catalyst in trucking in decades’



Tesla got beat to the affordable long range EV market by an old Detroit company (Chevrolet) and they are not the only autonomous player by any stretch of the imagination.

Maybe they should aim a little lower than being a massive disruption to the trucking industry. The value that they seek to add will almost certainly be beaten to market by existing competitors, and every one of their existing products came out 12-18 months later than they anticipated.
This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 10:48 am
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10967 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:46 am to
quote:

With those costs eliminated, the loads can be lighter and still be more profitable.
So, now you're arguing that there would be more vehicles on the road carrying more total weight -or just more vehicles, in general?

Have you never wondered why CEs count the number of vehicles in addition to their weight when factoring limits on road and bridge infrastructure? Much less how numbers affect the fluidity dynamics that increased traffic presents...
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28704 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:49 am to
quote:

No, they've got a new snake oil salesman dangling something shiny and new in their face.
There are already over half a million vehicles running on your snake oil in the US alone. Many of them can drive themselves already, too.
quote:

Nothing you say will make them think logically.
This statement applies more to you.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28704 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Tesla got beat to the affordable long range EV market by an old Detroit company (Chevrolet) and they are not the only autonomous player by any stretch of the imagination.

Maybe they should aim a little lower than being a massive disruption to the trucking industry. The value that they seek to add will almost certainly be beaten to market by existing competitors, and every one of their existing products came out 12-18 months later than they anticipated.
I think you're missing the point, which is that Tesla is the main factor forcing the change. You know, the "catalyst".
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64415 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:56 am to
quote:

I think the sooner you realize this is definitely going to happen, the better off you'll be.


I have no doubt it will happen. I just don't see it happening in any of our lifetimes. It's not near as simple as any of you kids think. You're talking about a fundamental shift in a transportation system that spans an entire continent. Even if Tesla started full production tomorrow you'd still have years (probably decades) of road reconstruction, hundreds of power plants to build (go look at how long building even one takes), and then building up the infrastructure to charge the things every few hundred miles.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Little Kim's Nukes

The Big Quake

Yellowstone Blowing

I'm counting on one of these 3 wiping out silicon valley before they wipe us out.


I'm with you. Let's solve traffic and pollution problems by going hyper-local.

Sorry, you don't get to eat avocados in the winter in New York.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110711 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

It's not near as simple as any of you kids think.


quote:

I have no doubt it will happen. I just don't see it happening in any of our lifetimes.
I understand it's not trucking, but if I told you 10 years ago Tesla would be where they are now, or SpaceX for that matter, I bet you would have never in your wildest dreams thought they'd be where they are now in 2017.

So there's that.



The fully autonomous trucking thing may be many many years in advance, but you're being pretty naive if you don't think EV trucking will be a thing in your lifetime or in the 20-30 years.
This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 11:00 am
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28704 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:00 am to
quote:

So, now you're arguing that there would be more vehicles on the road carrying more total weight -or just more vehicles, in general?
I'm arguing that autonomous electric semis will be more profitable than diesel ones with a driver.
quote:

Have you never wondered why CEs count the number of vehicles in addition to their weight when factoring limits on road and bridge infrastructure?
No, I haven't wondered that, because it has absolutely no bearing on anything related to my life. It also has little bearing on this conversation. What percentage of highway miles are driven by trucks? My quick research says about 10%. Let's say we have to DOUBLE that by going electric. Are you a CE, or do you know one that can run some quick figures on this? The impact seems minimal, and that's assuming electrics can't come closer to diesels in this regard.
quote:

Much less how numbers affect the fluidity dynamics that increased traffic presents...
Man, you are REALLY stretching this anti-electric argument now
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram