Started By
Message

re: I Disagree with Some of You Pot Smokers

Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:45 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79170 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:45 pm to
I support legalization, I just don't care enough about the potheads to advocate for their hobby.

It'll get here when it gets here.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:45 pm to
I think people blindly say "oh LA is such a red state it will never happen."

But people forget how lax we are on alcohol. I know it's not the same thing, but this state is more likely to accept it than you'd be led to believe. Hell we were the last state to change the drinking age to 18.

I don't see any reason why within the next 5-10 years it's at least "medically" allowed in almost all states
Posted by panterica
Member since Jun 2012
1274 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

I just don't care enough about the potheads


quote:

It'll get here when it gets here.


^ That's a suspiciously pot headed thing to say.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:47 pm to
sorry you don't care about extra revenue for your state
Posted by AdamDeMamp
$900.00
Member since Jul 2013
3276 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:47 pm to
The money it would generate is a positive point to bring up when speaking with those against legalization of some sort. The bottom line is, funds generated be damned, it should be legalized.

It should be treated equally to alcohol. Plain and simple.
Posted by LSUEnvy
Hou via Lake Chas
Member since May 2011
12094 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:47 pm to
Texas won't even legalize gambling much less pot.
Posted by Mung
NorCal
Member since Aug 2007
9054 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

There are so many hillbilly, backwoods bible beaters that still live in the 40's in this state.

It'll be 10-15 years before they all die off and then MAYBE they'll think about it.


this
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79170 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

sorry you don't care about extra revenue for your state


Why are you sorry for that?

Posted by agdoctor
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2004
3142 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:49 pm to
There wont be a positive effect. I just got back from a meeting where we are terminating people in Colorado for testing positive. Great thing is pot heads are the easiest one to catch
Posted by AdamDeMamp
$900.00
Member since Jul 2013
3276 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

But people forget how lax we are on alcohol. I know it's not the same thing,


Do you feel this way or are you referring to the perception by some? Why shouldn't they be treated the same?
Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
14977 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

hand scanners in a school

quote:

legalize marijuana


Apples and Oranges
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:50 pm to
so smoking legal weed at home at nights is different from a drink or two at home at night how?


companies are free to do what they want, that shouldn't inhibit legalization.
This post was edited on 1/17/14 at 3:51 pm
Posted by AdamDeMamp
$900.00
Member since Jul 2013
3276 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

terminating people in Colorado for testing positive.


To me that is the issue. How would employers test to see whether or not an employee is currently under the influence of marijuana considering it stays in your system for a varying period of time?
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
3946 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:52 pm to
I was thinking a decade, but like you point out....states are looking for forms of revenue. This economy could accelerate the process.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68494 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:52 pm to
If you think Mississippi will legalize weed in any of our lifetimes, you're insane.
Posted by Corkfather
Houston
Member since Sep 2007
19748 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

so smoking legal weed at home at nights is different from a drink or two at home at night how?


companies are free to do what they want, that shouldn't inhibit legalization.


This.

My company doesn't allow me to smoke weed. Even if I lived in Colorado I still couldn't smoke weed. I have to choose between my career and smoking weed, I choose my career. That doesn't mean people shouldn't be given the right to do so if they choose to.
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
3946 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:53 pm to
The active metabolizes are different from the metabolizes used to detect smoking in previous days/weeks/months.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59483 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:53 pm to
Not that I'm against legalization but you can have a drink or to at home and not really feel the effects. I'm not so sure you can take a toke and not catch a nice buzz. But that's about all I got.
Posted by panterica
Member since Jun 2012
1274 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Great thing is pot heads are the easiest one to catch


A person smoking weed on their own tmie is a terrible reason to fire them. I know that doesn't change the fact that those are company rules, but weed doesn't make a competent person a bad worker. As long as they're not smoking on the job of course.
Posted by LSUEnvy
Hou via Lake Chas
Member since May 2011
12094 posts
Posted on 1/17/14 at 3:54 pm to
Colorado has tests to determine levels in cases like driving under the influence.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram