- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:18 am to Napoleon
quote:
Yet let's say a certain race is more responsible for crime than other races, what would we call it if we limited that race's use of a job or service due to perceived security
Pragmatic?
This post was edited on 4/19/16 at 9:20 am
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:21 am to c on z
quote:
Did you even click the link?
nope
I saw "uber" and "kids" and immediately went to:
and thought "GENIUS!!!"
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:21 am to torrey225
quote:
LINK
Here's a service. Uber for kids. Are you offended by this too?
Are the employees only kids? Does it only hire kids?
(I'm not offended, I just think it's a blatant use of reverse sexism. )
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:23 am to Napoleon
I wanted to be offended, but let the market decide. If there's a place for this, they'll be successful, good for them. BUT, I don't want to hear shite from "women" about discrimination again. We all know the media and "advocacy" outrage if there were a men-only Uber/Lyft.
If they can have theirs and be successful, congratulations and stfu when men try it.
If they can have theirs and be successful, congratulations and stfu when men try it.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:43 am to Napoleon
I'd wait until they became successful and sue the shite out of them for discrimination (if I had no hope in life). All you gotta do is wear a dress to court.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:44 am to Napoleon
We had a long thread on it last week. It violates many state and local statutes, executive orders, and municipal ordinances banning discrimination based on gender, but it does not run afoul of federal law regarding public accommodations.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:52 am to Napoleon
Company will be out of business in a year. Their insurance will skyrocket with all those women drivers.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 9:52 am to Napoleon
This will fail miserably. Hot chicks already have a ride home from the club. And if they wait long enough, the ugly ones will too.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:12 am to Fonzarelli
quote:
Doesn't bother me, really.
You living off the grid?! The only reason I can understand you saying this.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:47 am to Napoleon
I hope they charge by the minute, because women driving other women around will never reach their destination.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:59 am to OweO
quote:
I am sure there are women who disagree with this
I disagree with this. As a woman, I do not want to entrust my life to woman driver. We suck at driving.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:18 am to Napoleon
So it's not about equality?
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:23 am to torrey225
quote:
You sound like a great person.
You sound like a woman
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:30 am to Napoleon
quote:
(men not allowed to use)
How will they enforce this policy now that we have learned you can have a penis and be a woman and have a vagina and be a man?
Posted on 4/19/16 at 1:06 pm to LouisianaLady
I thought you could see all the cars in the area?
Posted on 4/19/16 at 1:10 pm to Napoleon
I don't have a problem with this. It seems like a good idea, really. Women don't even drive Ubers/Lyfts at night due to safety concerns
Posted on 4/19/16 at 1:34 pm to BayouFann
quote:
You living off the grid?! The only reason I can understand you saying this.
No -- it doesnt stop me from getting in an uber/lyft as usual. If this company wants to cut off potential revenues by at least 50% of the population off the bat, then that is their own issue.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 8:17 pm to Fonzarelli
quote:
No -- it doesnt stop me from getting in an uber/lyft as usual. If this company wants to cut off potential revenues by at least 50% of the population off the bat, then that is their own issue
Uber shitted on the taxi market in a move to benefit themselves, the drivers and stop the taxis from ripping us off. Taxis are a little more honest where Uber service is near. And they stay on top of their revenue angles. I seriously doubt this happens.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 8:23 pm to LucasP
quote:
Choose your battles man, file this one under "who gives a shite".
Apparently the OP.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News