Started By
Message

re: Feds raid Centurian place "mansion". Confiscate Ferrari and much more

Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:58 am to
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:58 am to
You bet your candy arse they all posed with it with their hands on their chins like they were someone important. Probably full of scratches now and sitting in a lot waiting to get backed into by the new temp secretary
Posted by DanTiger
Somewhere in Luziana
Member since Sep 2004
9480 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Tax collectors doing their job. Civil forfeiture is disgusting.


Do you honestly believe that is even a drop in the federal bucket? Do you understand how our current economy works? When more funds are needed more money is printed in our current system. One day inflation will bit us in the arse but that day hasn't come yet because prices are still suppressed due to low demand.
Posted by TigerTreyjpg
Monroe, LA
Member since Jun 2008
5815 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Tax collectors doing their job. Civil forfeiture is disgusting.


Anybody who dosen't believe this is 100% true shouldn't be allowed to vote. Or breathe.


Ima say that's a little strong, although I do agree with your premise that the aforementioned federal raid, and others like it, have zero to do with public health, welfare, and safety, and everything to do with money. That fact alone - and I do think it's an establish fact at this point - should really get people pisseder than it does. Furthermore, people should be pisseder whether they smoke dope or not.

Had a semi-related discussion with my wife on this subject last night. The suckiest part of democracy is that the attention of the powers that be are historically grabbed when and only when several thousand people amass with weapons. It's basically happened 2.5 times in the history of this country. Around 1776, around 1861, and to some degree, the 60's.

It's a damn shame that THAT has to happen before folks begin to think of what policy, procedure, and measure are really doing to the greatest country ever established.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18897 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:47 am to
Not that facts will deter people arguing off topic but I had the chance to speak to someone yesterday that has some of the inside scoop on this investigation. Without going too in depth, this went a lot deeper than some guy selling some harmless recreational MJ substitute.

He was actively importing from China all sorts of varied industrial chemicals and manufacturing this stuff for consumption. I hate big government but agree there is a place for regulation to stop people from just selling random chemicals to people to ingest.

When the facts come out, I think most will agree this was a legit arrest.
Posted by Grit-Eating Shin
You're an Idiot
Member since May 2013
8432 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Somehow the "legalize marijuana" group seems to associate this stuff because people are calling it "fake weed"..very far from it as far as danger or side effects.
I agree. We need to stop calling it "fake weed" because that is incredibly misleading. The only thing that it has in common with weed is that you smoke some flowered plant. But the active ingredient doesn't come from the plant at all, and the effects of it are nothing like weed. This was also the case when JWH-18 was still legal.
Posted by Grit-Eating Shin
You're an Idiot
Member since May 2013
8432 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Synthetics get a bad rap, but the original formulas with JWH-18 was awesome. Once they started banning those chemicals is when it got dangerous.
Right, and everybody with any common sense predicted this outcome. Unfortunately, that excludes our lawmakers and governor.

Every prohibitory effort springs another, more dangerous black market.
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

but I had the chance to speak to someone yesterday that has some of the inside scoop on this investigation. Without going too in depth, this went a lot deeper than some guy selling some harmless recreational MJ substitute.

He was actively importing from China all sorts of varied industrial chemicals and manufacturing this stuff for consumption.


Inside scoop huh? Like the local news station? LINK

quote:

Dunn is accused of buying or selling items fraudulently imported to the United States from China. She is among nearly a dozen other suspects accused in this case that spans five states and China. "She certainly has not imported goods into the country, but is alleged to be involved in a conspiracy," Myer said.


Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:56 am to
Nakamoto has been witchunt Tran since day 1
Posted by TigerTreyjpg
Monroe, LA
Member since Jun 2008
5815 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Tax collectors doing their job. Civil forfeiture is disgusting.


Do you honestly believe that is even a drop in the federal bucket? Do you understand how our current economy works? When more funds are needed more money is printed in our current system. One day inflation will bit us in the arse but that day hasn't come yet because prices are still suppressed due to low demand


Dan, I'm no Rickety apologist, but I didn't take his post to mean that one federal raid had an effect on the federal budget. I took it more as Rickety having a problem with the entire federal policy as it pertains to drug laws in general, and marijuana specifically. Surely you've been the board target of such discussions, right? The ones where folks are upset over the amount of law enforcement dollars that get allocated to stopping people from selling and smoking pot, as well as the discussions on the measures and degrees of force used in raid type situations?
Posted by TigerTreyjpg
Monroe, LA
Member since Jun 2008
5815 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Not that facts will deter people arguing off topic but I had the chance to speak to someone yesterday that has some of the inside scoop on this investigation. Without going too in depth, this went a lot deeper than some guy selling some harmless recreational MJ substitute.

He was actively importing from China all sorts of varied industrial chemicals and manufacturing this stuff for consumption. I hate big government but agree there is a place for regulation to stop people from just selling random chemicals to people to ingest.

When the facts come out, I think most will agree this was a legit arrest


Pretty sure that even the most staunchest of libertarians would tend to agree with you on that. They'd also tell you that the problems associated w/synthetic weed would be non-existent if the real right thing were done.
Posted by DanTiger
Somewhere in Luziana
Member since Sep 2004
9480 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Dan, I'm no Rickety apologist, but I didn't take his post to mean that one federal raid had an effect on the federal budget. I took it more as Rickety having a problem with the entire federal policy as it pertains to drug laws in general, and marijuana specifically. Surely you've been the board target of such discussions, right? The ones where folks are upset over the amount of law enforcement dollars that get allocated to stopping people from selling and smoking pot, as well as the discussions on the measures and degrees of force used in raid type situations?


I understood his point but I believe he is misguided. I was not referring to this one raid but rather all federal raids. The money they generate is miniscule. I do believe that the ancillary income generated from having a DEA and paying federal salaries to those workers has an impact on many things, including the fed budget, but asset forfeiture is not something the feds do to generate income. I believe that these raids are done because most people want big brother to handle everything and the government has been happy to accommodate those demands. While these raids may generate a miniscule amount of income for the feds it has NOTHING to do with the motivation to perform them.
Posted by Grit-Eating Shin
You're an Idiot
Member since May 2013
8432 posts
Posted on 7/17/14 at 7:52 pm to
Well this doesn't look good for the cops. Federal magistrate said they lacked evidence and that the chemicals were legal when he ordered them. Bond set at $10,000.

LINK
Posted by Grit-Eating Shin
You're an Idiot
Member since May 2013
8432 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:57 am to
Can OP please update? I think this turn of events puts a whole new angle on the civil forfeiture being discussed earlier in the thread.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33860 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Ya...and booze is still worse.





Not even close.
Posted by JBM210
Member since Dec 2010
3192 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 6:39 pm to
Judge misspoke. Bond set at $100,000 instead of $10,000. Tran probably pulled it out of his shoe to pay it and laughed.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28105 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 6:50 pm to
So he puts up 10 points and walks out of jail.

They took all his crap for nothing.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Not even close.

Agreed. That fake weed shite can frick you up.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14942 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

The only thing that it has in common with weed is that you smoke some flowered plant. But the active ingredient doesn't come from the plant at all, and the effects of it are nothing like weed.


Chemically, the active ingredient binds the same receptor as THC. Thus, the comparison/similar name.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
123961 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Chemically, the active ingredient binds the same receptor as THC. Thus, the comparison/similar name.


The original did at least. JWH-114 or something like that. The problem is once they outlawed that the new formulations they came up with got farther and farther from the original and with new and worse side effects. Another product of making something illegal creating an even worse alternative on the market.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14942 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

The problem is once they outlawed that the new formulations they came up with got farther and farther from the original and with new and worse side effects.



Yes. The newer synthetics also target CB1 with a notable absence of CB2 affinity. More importantly, however, is their ability to activate the receptor as full agonists, as opposed to partial agonists like THC proper. Their binding half-life is also significantly longer. A (likely) less important but still significant difference is that natural plant marijuana contains a number of cannabinoids, one of which is cannabinadiol (CBD) which has essentially the opposite effects of THC (it's anti-psychotic and responsible for the anti-anxiety properties in some strains of weed, as opposed to the THC-heavy ones which are more pro-psychotic and more likely to induce anxiety).

The fact remains, however, they all, including the newer versions, target a common receptor. Thus the term "synthetic marijuana."


quote:

Another product of making something illegal creating an even worse alternative on the market.

Louisiana actually signed into law outlawing the growth/production/use/consumption etc of every known cannabinoid and blanket phrased "any analogues thereof" in hopes to quell the created problem you speak of. I'm not suggesting it was the right or the wrong move or that it has any effects on what's happening/going to happen, but the "you can't ban a substance because they'll just make one like it" argument makes much less sense now (key word: now) with the way the law is written.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram