- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Black holes do not exist and the Big Bang Theory is wrong, claims scientist
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:08 pm to Bmath
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:08 pm to Bmath
This is interesting. I mean clearly there are quite a few variables and I'd want other leading thinkers on the subject to chime in with their thoughts and analysis, but so far... Gotta say, I think I'd hit it.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:08 pm to Darth_Vader
this is actually a pretty significant discovery and the whole notion of black holes potentially not existing is like the least important thing about the overall finding
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:08 pm to Bmath
I've honestly always struggled with the concept. I've had trouble believing that during superheating and expansion of a star, it somehow compresses using less total matter than it just previously had while being more dense in the original state.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:09 pm to Pilot Tiger
also the study isn't peer reviewed so her findings essentially mean nothing at this point
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:10 pm to CptBengal
She didn't say black holes don't exist, she said stars dying can't form them.
Geeze learn some reading comprehension
ETA:
Okay well the article claims she DID say they can't exist, but her explanation just says stars dying can't create them
Geeze learn some reading comprehension
ETA:
Okay well the article claims she DID say they can't exist, but her explanation just says stars dying can't create them
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:11 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Hmmm...so I guess those super massive black holes they KNOW FOR A FACT exist in the center of galaxies are just fake too.
I'm more skeptical about the article. It claims in the bullet summary that her findings say that black holes do not exist. Yet they never quote that anywhere is the narrative. In fact, they only list her explanation about her finding that star death would not lead to black hole formation.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:13 pm to Bmath
Article is from the daily mail bro. I doubt they even know what any of this means.
That being said, this has my attention.
That being said, this has my attention.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:14 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Recent headlines have proclaimed “Black Holes Don’t Exist!” They’re wrong. Black holes absolutely exist. We know this observationally. We know by the orbits of stars in the center of our galaxy that there is a supermassive black hole in its center. We know of binary black hole systems. We’ve found the infrared signatures of more than a million black holes. We know of stellar mass black holes, and intermediate mass black holes. We can even see a gas cloud ripped apart by the intense gravity of a black hole. And we can take images of black holes, such as the one above. Yes, Virginia, there are black holes.
So what’s with the headlines? It seems to start with a link-bait article about a new work concerning the formation of stellar mass black holes. The paper hasn’t been peer reviewed, but it is an extension of an earlier work by the same authors that has been peer reviewed. The focus of both of these papers is on the firewall paradox, specifically how Hawking radiation might affect the gravitational collapse of a star to form a black hole.
LINK
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:14 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:there is a reason for that
Article is from the daily mail bro
they use a gossipy click bait title
and people post it to message boards
and some people freak out
and then we learn more about the actual study...and people stop freaking out
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:15 pm to Cs
Seems a bit miffed that someone questioned his position.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:15 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
I was actually talk about this thread.
I mean...I considered derailing the thread by adding the line, "Now...she COULD go the route of our intrepid ID Supporters and insist that school boards stick her pet hypothesis into classrooms so that she can have equal time...you know...out of fairness so that kids can be exposed to both sides," but I passed.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:16 pm to Darth_Vader
Gotta love the guys laughing at the woman scientist.
Wasn't it a woman who proved the game show probability theory? Other scientists laughed until she proved it. Then, they crept away with their dicks in their hands.
Pics of the doctor?
Eta never mind. Would definitely hit.
Wasn't it a woman who proved the game show probability theory? Other scientists laughed until she proved it. Then, they crept away with their dicks in their hands.
Pics of the doctor?
Eta never mind. Would definitely hit.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:16 pm to Pilot Tiger
YOUR NOT GOING TO SHAKE MY FAITH THESE STUDIES ARE FUNDED BY ABORSHEN GROUPS WHO JUST WANT TO TAKE JESUS AWAY FROM THE CHILDREN DONT FALL VICTIM TO BLASFEME
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:17 pm to UL-SabanRival
quote:
Pics of the doctor?
Come on dude, there are 3 separate post on the first page with pictures.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:19 pm to ChallboiMatt
I spew Hawking radiation in her black hole
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:20 pm to Darth_Vader
The science is settled. She must be on the payroll of Big Universe.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 12:20 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
YOUR NOT GOING TO SHAKE MY FAITH THESE STUDIES ARE FUNDED BY ABORSHEN GROUPS WHO JUST WANT TO TAKE JESUS AWAY FROM THE CHILDREN DONT FALL VICTIM TO BLASFEME
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News