- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2016: Volvo XC60 vs Acura MDX vs Toyota Highlander
Posted on 3/29/16 at 10:41 am to LSUvegasbombed
Posted on 3/29/16 at 10:41 am to LSUvegasbombed
I have an MDX. It guzzles gas and is expensive. Also, I'm constantly wishing it was bigger.
1
Posted on 3/29/16 at 2:06 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
I have a tahoe so not really needing the room
Posted on 3/29/16 at 3:15 pm to s14suspense
The current xc60 has a significantly nicer exterior than the old xc90.
The xc60 is more of a midsize crossover while the xc90 is a full size suv.
The interior of the xc60 looks more dated than the exterior.
The xc60 is more of a midsize crossover while the xc90 is a full size suv.
The interior of the xc60 looks more dated than the exterior.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 3:23 pm to 632627
quote:
The interior of the xc60 looks more dated than the exterior.
Yes, it has a phone number keypad on the dash.
I'll retract my statement about the exterior look being dated (it is), and say only in comparison to the fantastically modern and sophisticated new XC90 if that makes you feel better.
Posted on 3/29/16 at 3:28 pm to LSUvegasbombed
Last year, I was in a similar situation when buying for my wife (2016 XC90 vs 2016 Acura MDX vs Highlander). We looked at the JGC, because I loved the way they looked, but they just felt cheaper compared to the rest (We were looking at the summit)
The highlander is probably the most sensible, it has great resale value, safety, reliability, etc. Wife didn't like the way it looked.
I thought the 2016 XC90 was the best looking of the bunch. We were concerned with it being the first year of the model, and Volvo also being expensive repairs (Or so we had heard). We also heard they were safe, but not as reliable as the Japanese luxury brands.
We went with the 2016 Acura MDX advance (Front wheel drive, didn't see the benefit of AWD in Houston). This was mainly because we had such a bad experience with her old car (BMW 3 series) and I really didn't want to go with another European brand, so that knocked off Volvo.
It has been the best car either of us have ever owned. Super nice, no problems at all, reliable, safe, 3rd row, easy/cheap maintenance. I honestly have zero complaints, and the dealership has been really nice/helpful, which is so refreshing after having to deal with the a**holes at BWM for 5 years.
The highlander is probably the most sensible, it has great resale value, safety, reliability, etc. Wife didn't like the way it looked.
I thought the 2016 XC90 was the best looking of the bunch. We were concerned with it being the first year of the model, and Volvo also being expensive repairs (Or so we had heard). We also heard they were safe, but not as reliable as the Japanese luxury brands.
We went with the 2016 Acura MDX advance (Front wheel drive, didn't see the benefit of AWD in Houston). This was mainly because we had such a bad experience with her old car (BMW 3 series) and I really didn't want to go with another European brand, so that knocked off Volvo.
It has been the best car either of us have ever owned. Super nice, no problems at all, reliable, safe, 3rd row, easy/cheap maintenance. I honestly have zero complaints, and the dealership has been really nice/helpful, which is so refreshing after having to deal with the a**holes at BWM for 5 years.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News