- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grand Jury Indicts Cardell Hayes
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:50 pm to rt3
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:50 pm to rt3
quote:
if Fuller's paying you a quarter mill (or maybe more... just spitballing here) to make it and there's almost no ramifications against you... would you make it?
I doubt Fuller is paying him anywhere close to that lol.
And in a high profile case with national media attention? I sure as shite ain't risking my reputation like that. I get paid either way.
1
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:52 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Guy has been a PI barely over a year. He's getting his name out there.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:52 pm to JohnnyKilroy
case is moved to section H and Judge Camille Buras
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:53 pm to rt3
quote:
case is moved to section H and Judge Camille Buras
which means what? haha
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:53 pm to Winkface
quote:
He's getting his name out there.
By making shite up?
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:53 pm to rt3
quote:
if Fuller's paying you a quarter mill (or maybe more... just spitballing here) to make it and there's almost no ramifications against you... would you make it?
No ramifications? The dude isn't lying on the stand under oath because he was payed a lot of money. The defendant is no OJ Simpson. He's got very little cash. Most of which is tied up in an H2.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:54 pm to Keeble9145
quote:
which means what? haha
which means everyone is now moving in that direction
and out of the magistrate judge's courtroom... who I'm sure is glad the circus is moving across the hall
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:54 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
By making shite up?
Yes. That's his job.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:55 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Yes. That's his job.
Lying under oath is his job?
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:56 pm to dagrippa
quote:
No ramifications? The dude isn't lying on the stand under oath because he was payed a lot of money. The defendant is no OJ Simpson. He's got very little cash. Most of which is tied up in an H2.
1. he settles with the city for a lot of money not too long ago.
2. i don't think h PI is making it up. I think there is a crazy witness out there making shite up or that actually believes they saw that. Now that doesn't mean it happened. Likely it didn't happen.
3. There will be physical evidence that decides this case.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:57 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Fuller hasn't said a thing under oath. We are talking about the Defense attorney right?
Maybe you're talking about the PI. And in that case...prove he's lying.
"A witness told me. No I will not reveal the witness because this person asked to remain anonymous."
Maybe you're talking about the PI. And in that case...prove he's lying.
"A witness told me. No I will not reveal the witness because this person asked to remain anonymous."
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:58 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
1. he settles with the city for a lot of money not too long ago.
Everything I've seen was that it was about 100k 5 years ago.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:59 pm to SammyTiger
quote:this isn't a fact
Hayes was clearly armed when he approached Smith's vehicle
quote:It was reported that the shots came after Smith's party thought the confontation was over. That could easily mean that Hayes had gone back to his vehicle.
DO you think Hayes say Smith's gun, ran back to his car, got a gun ran back to Smith's car and someone shot him in the back?
quote:No proof that Hayes rear ended him on purpose. Are we to assume that Smith rear ended Hayes on purpose at the initial accident? Like I said that post was all made up except for Smith being shot in the back.
Now you can argue that he didn't intentionally rear end him, whatever. We know he followed him and rear ended him.
This post was edited on 4/28/16 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:59 pm to Fun Bunch
I'm talking about the PI.
Sorry, I just don't buy a PI lying under oath about what he was told because he's trying to get his name out there.
Sorry, I just don't buy a PI lying under oath about what he was told because he's trying to get his name out there.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 2:00 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
"A witness told me. No I will not reveal the witness because this person asked to remain anonymous."
anonymous woman is out and about fearing for her life.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 2:02 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Maybe you're talking about the PI. And in that case...prove he's lying.
"A witness told me. No I will not reveal the witness because this person asked to remain anonymous."
that then becomes a huge problem for the defense when the trial comes b/c that witness will HAVE to testify b/c the PI will not be able to due to it being hearsay
Posted on 4/28/16 at 2:02 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Travers Mackel reported the attorney said multi-million dollar settlements
So take that with a grain of salt.
$100,000 is a very small settlement for a shooting case.
So take that with a grain of salt.
$100,000 is a very small settlement for a shooting case.
Posted on 4/28/16 at 2:05 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Natasha Robin ?@NRobinFOX8
Two woman were handcuffed and taken away. Sherif office attorney says the women were throwing punches to the face
Posted on 4/28/16 at 2:05 pm to JohnnyKilroy
He says someone told him that. If it turns out to be a lie, it isn't on him. He becomes known as "defense friendly."
Posted on 4/28/16 at 2:06 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
"A witness told me. No I will not reveal the witness because this person asked to remain anonymous."
Probably the same person that told the media that the Saints tried to trade up to #1 for a QB.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News