Started By
Message

re: Official Free Agency and Trade Thread: Latest Pels sign Charles Cooke to 2 way

Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:29 pm to
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34319 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

The idea is that QPon could contribute so we may end up sending out Ajinca and cash instead or buy him out.


The best laid plans of Loomis and Demps.......
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61508 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

The best laid plans of Loomis and Demps.......


Being paralyzed by past mistakes may well have optimized the offseason. If they can bring Cunningham back for another year on a near minimum deal they'd have a lot of value deals to pair with Ajinca and/or Moore later in the year.
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
5736 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 9:45 pm to
MM posted this idea on Twitter. Thoughts?

Asik, Ajinca, and a 2018 top 10 protected 1st for Lopez

I like better if lottery protected and if we could throw in QPon to get back Zipser but I digress

66% of people said yes to this deal on Twitter
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61508 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 9:52 pm to
I say no because I wonder how useful RoLo is with this roster. I also think he'd be hard to trade simply because it's near impossible to get any kind of value for a traditional center these days. I really want them to find a way to eat the shite sandwich they made so they don't have to use picks to get out of it.
Posted by Silverfoxx
Member since Mar 2016
880 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 10:07 pm to
WTF kinda deal is that ? I'm usually a fan of MM thoughts but I'm totally against that shite
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
21051 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 10:14 pm to
Lopez would be our shitty built in backup plan if Boogie left.
Posted by MrPel
Member since Dec 2014
2342 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 10:20 pm to
I'd do it for Ajinca/Asik but not giving up a first. Nets would have no reason to do that so forget the idea. Lopez as a replacement for useless Ajinca/Asik would be nice though. Would basically be adding a player who would see significant PT anytime Boogie isn't on the floor.
This post was edited on 8/9/17 at 11:28 pm
Posted by pawel
Warsaw, Poland
Member since Oct 2016
788 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:28 am to
Nets are looking for a center and are probably my only hope to take Ajinca cheap (looking for a center)...

Bulls where RoLo is actually playing wont do it without pick. They screwed a pick in Butler trade. Probably want it back.

I personally wont do this trade. It is easier to move smaller pieces alone.
Of course in Asiks case nothing is easy.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9786 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 6:24 am to
quote:

Nets would have no reason to do that so forget the idea.


I'm not sure which Lopez brother he is talking about, but neither play for the Nets. Robin plays for the Bulls and Brook for the Lakers..
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25567 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 7:14 am to
quote:


Asik, Ajinca, and a 2018 top 10 protected 1st for Lopez



Absolutely not.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 7:16 am to
quote:

Thoughts?

Asik, Ajinca, and a 2018 top 10 protected 1st for Lopez



so it is send out a pick to save ~$1.5M this season (~$6M over 3 years) to bring back Cunningham? no thanks.
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 10:18 am to
Looks like all no's on here, yet the poll received over 350 votes and got 66% yes votes.

I personally wouldn't do it, but I'd do something like that. Those thinking that Diallo can come in and be a 3rd or even 4th big for 80 games plus the playoffs are a bit optimistic IMO. I like him as much as anyone, but he is still a very raw kid. Lopez getting 15-20 minutes on this team and spot starts when injuries pop up would give the Pels a couple more victories than Diallo doing the same.

And that pick is gone sooner or later. Just depends on the return, and getting rid of Asik is the major component of this trade.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61508 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 10:38 am to
quote:

I personally wouldn't do it, but I'd do something like that.


I have no problem using a 1st to turn that salary into something useful, I just don't think a traditional center is very useful with AD/DC taking up most if not all of the center minutes.

quote:

getting rid of Asik is the major component of this trade.


Except you replaced him with someone who because of his postion, not his talent level, really wouldn't get the opportunity to be worth that 1st. You paid a 1st to convert Asik and Ajinca's salary into what is essentially a 4th or 5th big because he's behind AD/DC and Small Ball.

I realize we aren't turning Asik and a 1st into a wing or guard worth trading for. At this point I think you have to put on the optimism bias glasses, bring back Cunningham and plan on dumping salary in December/January to get back under the tax. Hopefully enough of Moore/Clark/Crawford/Miller/QPon/Cunningham/Diallo play at a level that lets you bundle one or 2 of them with Ajinca in a dump. Or if QPon doesn't work out, use cash to dump him.

Maybe it doesn't work out and teams know you're desperate and you still have to give up a first to get under the tax this year, but that's the selling low option so I'd leave that as my last resort and not do it right now.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 10:39 am
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32476 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 10:47 am to
I think I may do it, if the pick is lottery protected.

As you said, AD and Cousins will each miss some games (probably about 10 each). Having RoLo start those games could be key to a few more wins.

Worst case scenario, you miss the playoffs but still keep your pick, so it minimizes the downside of the season.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25567 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:20 pm to
I dont' mind the idea of having a backup C like RoLo, I actually like that, but i'm not giving up a 1st to trade Asik for that. There are a ton of backup bigs that can do what we would be asking of them, for minimal money. Kyle O'Quinn would work just fine in that role, at $4M/yr for the next 2 years. I'm sure it wouldnt' be hard to get him.
Tyler Zeller is still out there in FA.

There is absolutely no reason to give away a first to get rid of Asik unless it absolutely makes us better. It's hard to justify that a backup C makes us that much better.

Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
5736 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:33 pm to
What if instead of RoLo you were able to get Mirotic in a S&T? Problem would be maybe you can't bring back DC unless you include QPon and are willing to play Cunningham at the 3.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25567 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:04 pm to
I'd like mirotic, but no.
This team does not need anything more than 1 year near minimum guys at backup center for the foreseeable future.
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
5736 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:06 pm to
I think in this case you'd still get a min guy like Zeller to be a backup 5 since Mirotic is a stretch 4. It would possibly mean no Cunningham though.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25567 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 1:38 pm to
I'm just of the mindset that there is absolutely no reason to spend money on a backup 4 and 5 with AD and Cousins. Rookie contracts and minimum guys will suffice. Spend the money on shooters.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61508 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 5:04 pm to
From Bobby Marks:

quote:

New Orleans amended the contract of Jordan Crawford to guarantee his contract $250K for the season. The $1.7M contract for Crawford was set to become fully guaranteed last week but both sides amended his contract with the revised protection. The protection will increase to $750K if the contract is not waived by 11/10. The Pelicans are walking a tightrope when it comes to the hard cap. New Orleans is currently $1,473,576 below the hard cap with one roster spot available. A minimum roster spot would cost the Pelicans $1,471,382.


I calculate the team would be about $2.2 million away from the tax line if it cut Crawford. If Cunningham's only other offers are minimums it seems like that would get it done. I know there would be some fans melting like we just traded Tim Frazier, but I'd cut Crawford before I burned assets to move a bad contract.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 5:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 137 of 138Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram