Started By
Message

re: Be honest. Do you give a shite about the Oscars this year?

Posted on 2/26/17 at 3:50 pm to
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8627 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Never have

Never will
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18436 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 3:55 pm to
Nope....because 2016 was a weak year film-wise.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 4:19 pm to
I enjoy watching them entertain me.
I don't give two shits about them or their stupid awards.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108557 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 4:30 pm to
Not really. 2016 was not a good year for film. I'm just rooting for Kubo, OJ Made in America, and Arrival to pull of an upset that isn't going to happen.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65114 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 4:34 pm to
I keep watching mainly out of tradition. I haven't missed a ceremony since the year Gladiator won Best Picture. The last few years have been mediocre for film, with the possible exception of 2012.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
27736 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 4:37 pm to
dont really care, wife and I will do our normal routine of watching our Sunday shows and about 9pm starting the Oscars back on the DVR and finishing by 10.

Monologue, Award winners, done

dont care about speeches. if anything big happens im sure ill hear about it afterwards and ill just google it
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
16250 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

... I'm just rooting for Kubo, OJ Made in America, and Arrival to pull of an upset that isn't going to happen.
I enjoyed all three of these films as well.
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
11451 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 6:27 pm to
This year??????? I could care less what that club of misfits think about one another much less their views on other matters...they are actors, athletes on film...that's it
Posted by rickyh
Positiger Nation
Member since Dec 2003
12460 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 7:02 pm to
Never have

Never will
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56369 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 7:04 pm to
Well, and the two "racist" characters didn't exist, and the bathroom situation never happened.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14503 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 7:30 pm to
I used to always like to watch the Oscars and I'm not ate up with the politics either, but they are and it just ruins the whole thing for me. And I'm not a Trump apologist by any means but I just know what's coming and that's not what I want to watch a show like that for.

I like movies and Trump ain't got nothing to do with that.
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6088 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Probably, but I'd love to hear the bitching if they didn't.

Hidden figures doesn't deserve shite. The acting was average and the story is just strongly embellished propaganda bull shite - just like The Butler.

Good gracious you could apply the exact same logic to Manchester By the Sea, a story that's been told a thousand times. Same story, same ethnic group, yada yada yada. At least Hidden Figures, a film that, like Manchester, is by no means Academy Award worthy,
those with an agenda, tells a story that has been told a fraction of the number of times.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35535 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 7:50 pm to
quote:


Well, and the two "racist" characters didn't exist, and the bathroom situation never happened.


Well I found this...I guess your argument...

quote:

The primarily white Main Stream Media began frenetic virtue-signaling with the #OscarsSoWhite movement.

This helped spawned a bidding war over the “true” story of how a lone black female helped fulfill John F. Kennedy’s promise of putting a man on the moon before the end of the 1960s:

And Fox 2000 and Chernin are developing Hidden Figures, a movie about the African-American women who helped NASA launch its first space missions.

[Hollywood’s Casting Blitz: It’s All About Diversity in the Wake of #OscarsSoWhite, by Rebecca Ford, Hollywood Reporter, March 2, 2016]

But the recent canonization of Katherine Johnson and her “untold” contributions to NASA’s incredible achievements (think about it: the Wright brothers were the first humans to fly in 1903, NASA landed men on the moon only 66 years later) stretches credulity.

Why isn’t Johnson mentioned in John Glenn’s John Glenn: A Memoir or Alan Shepard’s Moon Shot: The Inside Story of America’s Race to the Moon?

Why does Charles Murray not mention her in his seminal book on the Apollo program (co-authored with Katherine Murray), Apollo: Race to the Moon?
Why is Johnson not mentioned in Tom Wolfe’s epic The Right Stuff,documenting the sensational story of NASA’s first astronaut group, the all-white Mercury 7.

Why, especially oddly, is Johnson not mentioned in We Could Not Fail: The First African Americans in the Space Program.

Why was Johnson not mentioned in either Jet or Ebony magazine, two black magazines that spent the 1960s and 1970s simultaneously lamenting the lack of blacks at NASA and celebrating any minor achievements of blacks in the space program.

Why, given her alleged role in the Apollo 13 drama, does Johnson not appear in Jim Lovell’s autobiographical Lost Moon: The Perilous Voyage of Apollo 13(subsequently made into the Tom Hanks movie, Apollo 13).

Why does Gene Kranz, the Flight Director of NASA famously played by Ed Harris in Apollo 13, fail to mention Katherine Johnson in his autobiography Failure is Not an Option: Mission Control from Mercury to Apollo 13 and Beyond?

Why, perhaps most significantly, does Johnson not appear in Harlem Princess: The Story of Harry Delaney’s Daughter, the autobiography of Ruth Bates Harris? Harris, who took the job of Deputy Assistant Administrator for Equal opportunity for NASA in 1972, famously said, “I saw no minorities or women as astronauts. Could I help make a difference?”

Harris waged a war to get more blacks involved with NASA, which was a paltry 5.6 percent non-white in 1973 versus a government agency average of 20 percent minority. [Societal Impact of Spaceflight, 2007, PDF]
Why does Johnson not appear in Beyond Uhura: Star Trek and Other Memories, by the black actress Nichelle Nichols, who played the part of Lt. Uhura in the iconic TV series Star Trek? Nichols waged a personal crusade against the overwhelming white nature of NASA, giving a speech in 1977, “New Opportunities for the Humanization of Space,”lamenting how white the space agency was and how this was dehumanizing to nonwhites.

Johnson was never mentioned in the New York Times or the Washington Post before this year. She is nowhere to be found in ‘This New Ocean,’ NASA’s comprehensive internal history of Project Mercury.

Before 2015, the Charleston Gazette and Daily Mail wrote about her exactly once. The story appeared in the Gazette in 1977 to note that she had been honored by the Afro-American Historical and Cultural Museum in Philadelphia. It did not mention NASA. It was five sentences long.

“We’re in a country that sometimes we have revisionist history, and if you go look at history books, lots of times there aren’t African-Americans in there,” said Leland Melvin, a former space shuttle astronaut. “It’s so easy to just have an omission and play up the people and things that you want to make prominent.”
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47899 posts
Posted on 2/26/17 at 9:47 pm to
Haven't given a shite about the oscars since the Michelle Obama worship a few years back.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram