re: Batman vs Superman on demand

quote:

---

Why would Superman take the time to gather wood and then burn people

---

Good question

quote:

---

Which is enough not to incriminate Superman.

---

If bad guys don't make mistakes, how would they lose?

quote:

---

You're making any stupid bullshite excuse to make up for this stupid bullshite movie.

---

Nah, just the simplest explanation using tactics already used belt lex. (I.e. Government official jolly rancher scene)

And says the guy who questions a characters motives in DC bc he would have read Frankenstein, therefore never create a monster.

quote:

---

Wouldn't that leave a great deal of evidence though? Two massive lasers pointing at someone? Surely that would have left some unique evidence.

---

Wouldn't that show that Superman is arrogant and how he doesn't care what other people think of how he handles situations? That would probably cause the people to turn against him right???

Hmm interesting....

quote:

---

The Superhero does it better than they do. Look at the Winter Soldier and Civil War.

---

So only cherry pic stories that fit your point of view?

Fallacy

quote:

---

He doesn't create the monster because he can't control it and is much worse than the person he is fighting against, you moron

---

can you rewrite that without the double neg?

quote:

---

So only cherry pic stories that fit your point of view?

---

You asked "How", so I answered. I gave some good examples of how to do it. What do you want me to do, give you bad examples?

quote:

---

can you rewrite that without the double neg?

---

Yeah, write off my point due to an on-the-fly grammatical error. Shows that you're on the losing end of the argument.

quote:

---

You asked "How", so I answered.

---

So you ignored the context of my question and what it responded to

quote:

---

Yeah, write off my point due to an on-the-fly grammatical error.

---

It's hard for someone to understand your point with a double neg

quote:

---

Shows that you're on the losing end of the argument.

---

Making fallacies and calling names would do that

Like others have said, it's nowhere near as bad as many make it out to be, but it's also nowhere near as good as many make it out to be either. Affleck and Gadot were the best parts and I enjoyed the fight with Doomsday but it was an all around mess and why so many characters and story lines were introduced in one flick is beyond me including "killing" Superman 2 flicks into the franchise, as if he would totally dead.

quote:

---

What's the context of

---

You said this

quote:

---

Which is enough not to incriminate Superman

---

And I responded with an obvious rhetorical question of "how" with the obvious context of "no shite he made a mistake; villains in comics
Make mistakes otherwise they rarely lose"

And it still doesn't change the fact that:
1) The bodies were burned covering up the evidence
2) Only one person found a bullet. No other bullets were found.
3) the CIA soldiers, hear superman coming from a distance then show up to a place where superman just left with a pile of burned Bodies ( you wouldn't know that since you refuse to watch the ultimate edition so you continue to make stupid criticisms)
4) Everyone who witnessed the shooting was dead
5) lex Influenced multiple people to say they witnessed superman burn the people alive


It's sad I have to spell it out for you.

quote:

---

I'm able to call you out on all your bullshite points

---

I entered the thread calling attention to your retarded criticism.

I liked BvS. I liked BvS (UE) a lot. But, there's no doubt the weakest part of the movie is Eisenberg's Luthor. It was like he was doing a bad riff of Robin Williams as a supervillian.

But, to shite on this movie for plot holes or unsatisfactory villians is hypocritical, at best. For all the ball washing Marvel gets on here, their villians haven't exactly been A-listers.

quote:

---

I've never read a comic in my life fwiw.

---

quote:

---

Not happy with the Batman character.

---

That explains it...

He was THE best part of the movie.