Started By
Message

re: Avenger: AoU Reviews (**MAJOR SPOILERS**)

Posted on 5/2/15 at 6:25 am to
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 6:25 am to
Those jumpy parts are editing problems.

The Blu-ray release is going to have The over 3 hours original directors cut with the alternate ending that isn't a happy ending.

I'm stupid excited about that.
Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
7653 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 6:27 am to
quote:

It had its hokey moments and the beginning they sacrificed some CGI money for the end,but it was fricking awesome.


Wasnt just the beginning, there were bad spots throughout the movie. With the budget they can command, there is no excuse for bad CGI. This movie is guaranteed $1.4 Billion in revenue at a minimum. No excuse.

quote:

The main theme on this board and with my friends is that Winter Soldier is the best Mcu to date. I completely disagree.

Maybe I'll have to watch WS again but it didn't blow me away or anything.


I do feel WS is the best movie still. I enjoy the tone of GotG and AoU, but WS is a better overall movie than both. AoU literally had 0 tension, one of the problems with everyone knowing such long term plans. GotG being a more unknown property gave it a lot more.

My rank is 1) WS 2) GotG 3) AoU 4) Avengers 5) Ironman

quote:

Fantastic mix of comedy and action. Hulk finally coming into controlling his powers was awesome. Vision was awesome. The lines between CA and IM are clearly taking shape.


All of this. Loved the comedy, and as I said before that is an accurate portrayal of highly trained teams who trust each other in tense situations.

quote:

Spader owned Ultron. I thought they nailed the whole movie.


Yes he did, loved the Stark-isms he had in the character. I thought the CGI on him was kind of rough, and the character itself was not compliment to the comics. He never felt like a high level villain. Didnt help the lack of tension. I know why he wasnt killing civilians(to buy time by not hyper motivating the Avengers), but it might have been a better movie if more humans died, if that makes sense. More skin in the game as it were.


Edit: Any thoughts on my diatribe regarding the AI in the scepter?
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 6:30 am
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 6:30 am to
quote:

My problem with the whole Avengers is that the threat never really feels real. Does anybody ever doubt that they won't get the job done? Or that one of the heroes will die? 


One of the heroes did die. And they're gearing up to kill 3 more of them in the next phase of the movies.

quote:

but his whole plan was to lift a square mile patch of city above the earth and drop it? Come on. 



You do a meteor a mile wide would kill all life on earth right? That's not a comic book thing that's real life science.

quote:

here, Thor and Hulk alone could've handled Ultron, probably just Hulk.


Ultron beat the ever living shite out of Thor and Vision, was made of pure solid badass captain America shield metal, and had the blasting powers of Iron Man. No, they couldn't of handled him themselves.

Maybe Hulk, because he's Hulk, but if they bothers you then you should quit watching comic book movies. He's the Hulk. And Avengers 2 was the absolute best screen adaptation of the Hulk ever.

Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
7653 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 6:35 am to
quote:

Avengers 2 was the absolute best screen adaptation of the Hulk ever.


Nothing else is even close. He was by far my favorite part of the movie. The fight with Iron Man was the penultimate fight of the movie imo. Was by far the most fun. I was when Tony knocked the tooth out.

Though, the moment in the end where he jumped in the jet and grabbed Ultron was way to similar to him using Loki as a rag doll at the end of the first Avengers. They went back to that well again. "Hulk grab bad guy after bad guy lose and hurt him in funny manner".
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 6:39 am to
quote:

Wasnt just the beginning, there were bad spots throughout the movie. With the budget they can command, there is no excuse for bad CGI. 


I kind of agree, but they do give the director and CGI department a budget. And the last half hour fight scene was fricking amazing. I assume that ate up most of their time and budget. The rest must've been consumed with Hulk's rampage and fight with IM

quote:

AoU literally had 0 tension


Can you expound on this before I respond. I isn't really get what you're saying.

quote:

Loved the comedy, and as I said before that is an accurate portrayal of highly trained teams who trust each other in tense situations. 



quote:

He never felt like a high level villain.


See I disagree here too. For the first time I thought he gave the Avengers a run for their money. In the first Avengers, there was never doubt in my mind that they'd win. They smashed the hell out of the alien tech at the end of the movie pretty effortlessly and there wasn't one cohesive villain. Loki was kind of the man behind the mask but he was never ever a legitimate threat to anything.

Ultron on the other hand best the shite out of every avenger he faced. IM, CA, Thor, Quicksilver. He was a beast. I very much enjoyed his character.

quote:

Any thoughts on my diatribe regarding the AI in the scepter? 


Can you repost it?
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 6:43 am
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 6:41 am to
quote:

He was by far my favorite part of the movie. The fight with Iron Man was the penultimate fight of the movie imo. Was by far the most fun. I was  when Tony knocked the tooth out. 


Completely agree. I laughed my arse off when he spit it out. The whole scene was just awesome.

As was him taking out the Bunker early on. And getting all upset when Thor mentioned all the people he's killed.

quote:

the moment in the end where he jumped in the jet and grabbed Ultron was way to similar to him using Loki as a rag doll at the end of the first Avengers. They went back to that well again. "Hulk grab bad guy after bad guy lose and hurt him in funny manner".


He's the fricking Hulk dude. And Ultron had ready been fighting and weakened at that point. I get what you're saying, but I'm a huge Hulk fan.
Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
7653 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 6:55 am to
quote:

Can you expound on this before I respond. I isn't really get what you're saying.


Slight rewording of an earlier post of mine.

Because of the future movies, we know ahead of time who will live through it for sure. Ultron as a character was wasted because of this. He is one of the biggest bads in the MU, yet in the end after his army was gone he wilted under the power of Thor, IM, and Vision. I wish they would have let him put up a stronger and longer fight. If not there then....somewhere. A scrappier scrap, I needs it. It felt like what it is, a transitional movie with just enough tension to make sitting through it worth the ride. Though the Scarlet Witch did far, far, far, far more than Ultron to move the MCU along in the movie. She was the catalyst for everything.


quote:

Can you repost it?



Wish SW would have told them what she knew about the work HYDRA was doing on the scepter. How did they know what to look for without Starks hologram tech? Would also have liked to know what the AI was within the Scepter. Not sure how to put this. That AI created Ultron, but through a Jarvis and Stark filter. I guess that is the best way to put it? Obviously the AI was created by Thanos, or a minion. Since the scepter originated with him.

Anyone who thinks the AI was not, at least partially in Ultron, missed that Ultron knew an infinite stone was in the staff. Only way he could have known was if the AI from the staff was still a part of him. Did the AI protocols left in Ultron keep him from breaking out the infinite stone until a weapon was developed to use it properly?

Was it the AI that controls minds, and just lets the holder think it gives them control but keeps it for Thano? Or is it a conduit to focus and guide the power of the infinite gem through the scepter? Defining the scepter's powers for the user. Such as mind control and everything else.



Reposting another thought too:

I am assuming Theta protocol in Agents of Shield was the carrier and manpower Fury showed up with.
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 7:01 am
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 7:24 am to
Yeah we know who survives, but it's a comic book movie. Usually the main guys survive. Although the next phase of movies that is going to change. And fast. I didn't see quicksilver dying. That's was crazy.

quote:

yet in the end after his army was gone he wilted under the power of Thor, IM, and Vision.


To be fair that's a god, a robot God more powerful than Thor, and iron man.

quote:

wish they would have let him put up a stronger and longer fight. If not there then....somewhere. A scrappier scrap, I needs it. 


Maybe if you add up the fights with IM, Cap, and Thor you get your scrap. But I see what you're saying.

quote:

How did they know what to look for without Starks hologram tech? 


I don't think they did. They only figured out how to limitedly harness some of the power of the infinity gem within. Further, as I explain below, the AI within the scepter surrounding the infinity stone pointed them in that direction.

quote:

Would also have liked to know what the AI was within the Scepter


I thought of it as a sort of control program around the infinity stone. That particular stone is the mind stone. The AI as I viewed it was a conduit between the mindstone and the scepter. Something to keep the gem in place and you keep whoever wielded the staff under slight control in the greater scheme. Something to help Thanos carry out his plan.

Ultron kept saying I had strings but now I am free.

Thanos imprisoned the AI within the scepter to do his bidding and control the infinity gem.

Jarvis, Tony, and Banner released that AI. It wasnt quite through a "Jarvis filter" as much as it first learned how to be from Jarvis therfore picking up his qualities and absorbing them when he killed Jarvis. If that makes any sense. His original purpose as he gained from reading Tony's files, was protection but, much like vision, intelligent life doesn't follow it's creator. It does it's own thing.

He was an amalgamation of Stark protocol, Thanos AI, Jarvis programming, etc... He was something new once he was created.

As for the last part, I don't want agents of shield, so no idea.

This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 7:34 am
Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
7653 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Thanos imprisoned the AI within the scepter to do his bidding and control the infinity gem.



The AI copied itself to create Ultron . It didnt leave the Scepter. Which tells me that it still had a plan or protocol. It is possible the plan was to control the new AI, or fully download itself. So that it could personally remove the infinite gem for Thanos. Which also implies that Stark's tech was the only thing on the planet that was powerful enough to handle his programming. What became Ultron was a tool, but changed with his interaction with Jarvis. When he kept talking about strings, Ultron could have been referring to either, or both, the AI around the stone and Thanos. Later on, Ultron destroying it for the gem was a product of Ultron's malfunction.

Also, how could Ultron use the scepter as a non human without a brain to guide thoughts? I have 2 ideas to hash this out from my end.

1)By using the part of him that remained from the original copy of the AI, when touching the scepter, to interact with the original AI via the scepter.

2)The other idea is that he is under the illusion he can use it, when in fact he isnt controlling anyone, but something else is. We can make this leap because the Gem and SW are in the same realm of powers. She cant read Ultron's mind because he was a non flesh entity, which also means he cannot project thought to control someones will. So how can he control another human? Refer to point 1A below.

All of this also begs the question. Why couldn't Ultron, a copy of the AI using the gem, use it before building the Vision body?(1A) He didnt need the gem to power it, but enhance it. So was he a neutered version, originally designed to obey the AI's commands? Or was it the primitive human tech that cut him off from his full abilities? or 1A

The reason I think the AI is a bigger story than they acted in the movie post Ultron, is Thanos. His reaction and statement are indicative of someone else failing. Saying I will do it myself means someone else failed, because if it was HIS plan. The wording would have been different. He would have already been doing it himself if it was his plan.



quote:

I don't think they did. They only figured out how to limitedly harness some of the power of the infinity gem within


It wasnt the gem HYDRA was after, I dont think they even realized one was in there. Scarlet Witch somehow knew/hoped what Stark would do with it based on his motivations and whatever she knew of HYDRA's work. Whatever she needed/wanted him to do was part of what HYRDA was working on. No one on earth knew the gem was in there. Not even Thor. If you look when he is walking through the warehouse toward the scepter, there are half built robots everywhere. Which later became the beginning of Ultron's army. They knew it was an AI.


1A: I am really starting to like my theory that the AI allows the holder of the scepter an illusion of control as long as that user's actions fits Thanos' plan. It is what actually controls minds. It has neuropathways whereas Ultron has hardware.
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 8:14 am
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35267 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 8:18 am to
quote:

The Blu-ray release is going to have The over 3 hours original directors cut with the alternate ending that isn't a happy ending.
This makes me very happy.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 8:23 am to
quote:

director Joss Whedon has already gone on record as saying that the film’s original cut was around three hours long, and a common criticism of the final film – that its plot feels muddled and, at times, rushed – is exactly the kind of issue that would benefit from an extended cut.
Posted by sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
15013 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 8:24 am to
I rather enjoyed the film. Spader knocked it out of the park for me.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 8:32 am to
where are these crazy assumptions coming from......
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 8:33 am
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 8:34 am to
Nothing confirmed, but multiple hints and rumors as well as a comment by Wheden
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 8:40 am to
I'm referring to a discussion we had on the first page, mixed with sarcasm
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35267 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 8:44 am to
Hopefully it will answer some of the missing elements. The beginning in particular. I did catch something that Scarlet Witch said about Tony Stark that explains a little more about Tony's mindset in the movie. She said "I knew it would control him" or something like that. That's why she let him take the scepter. It sounds like there's some Lord of the Rings elements going on with the stones. After thinking about it, it made me more at ease about some of the decisions Tony made.
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 8:47 am
Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
7653 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 9:22 am to
quote:

I knew it would control him


I thought she was referring to his fears and doubts about himself. In fact I thought the line was closer to one of either, "I saw his fear, I knew it would control him", or "I knew his fears would control him".

If she did mean the scepter. It comes back to the biggest unexplained mystery, at least to me, in the film. The who, what, when, where, how why of that damned AI.

Also, if Thanos knew an infinity gem was in there. Why would he give that up to someone else? They are too powerful,and too precious. Unless, that AI could control anyone holding the scepter via the gem, not just beings the user touched with it.
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 9:23 am
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35267 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 9:29 am to
quote:

If she did mean the scepter.
I'm pretty sure Quicksilver asked her why she let Stark have the scepter and she said because she knew it would control him.

ETA: But I do see what you're saying. I don't think the stones all out control people, but they can sway judgement quite a bit. As far as why Thanos gave the scepter to Loki, I kind of just write that off as a reason to save Thanos for the final battle. Loki was a minion of Thanos, so Thanos gave him a weapon to use to take over the world. I don't think about it much more than that. Did Thanos have this master plan to corrupt Tony, I don't know. They haven't answered any of those questions. One can only..............."assume".
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 9:50 am
Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
7653 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I'm pretty sure Quicksilver asked her why she let Stark have the scepter and she said because she knew it would control him.


I thought she meant the fear. They probably meant for it to be a bit ambiguous. Really, it changes nothing for this movie as a standalone. Huge implications for the MCU though.

If you are right, and I am repeating myself here...again . Then the AI was controlling Loki and everyone else in Avengers one. Because Loki was more mentally damaged than Stark was, if that was the specification for control. Means it was also controlling Strucker(sp?) and his team. Trying to bring about its goal of death on earth. Also if you are right, then when Tony insisted on finishing Vision despite the the circumstances. Could that mean the blight from the scepter will be staying with Tony more permanently?


I wonder if the writers read forums like this and just laugh at fans for thinking they go this deep with the writing. It is possible it was just a scepter and a random AI, that wanted a way out, got out, got tainted, and went nuts. :duno:


Edit:
quote:

I don't think the stones all out control people,


We have seen the power of the scepter, we have seen that it can control people's minds. Through the power of the stones, the scepter does it via the AI, I guess. How else would it work? Brings us back to the circular discussion of who controls those using the scepter and those touched by the scepter.

Thanos - AI - User - Whatever the writers feel like saying. round and round we go...
This post was edited on 5/2/15 at 10:05 am
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35267 posts
Posted on 5/2/15 at 10:01 am to
Read my ETA. I'm more talking about the concerns I had with some of the decisions Tony made in the movie.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 27
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 27Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram