Started By
Message

Are movie production companies over-saturating the market with superhero flicks?

Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:29 pm
Posted by ag3ntpurpl3
Member since Aug 2011
1140 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:29 pm
I don't mind one way or the other where movie production companies spend their time/money on films but it seemed to me that through the 2000s, and continuing, that we have seen an age of superhero movies, regardless of quality, hit the big screen than we ever have before (I know this isn't a novel thought) but my question is whether this is a good thing or an over-saturation of the market based on production companies realizing no matter what the story is, people will pay to watch.

It teeters on the edge of disrespecting your consumer, in my opinion, because they know superhero flicks sell and they will continue to just push out whatever they can to make a quick buck and, we all know, they have ungodly amounts of material to pull from (i.e. comic books/characters).

I used this generic website

Superhero Movie List

to compile a list and this is what I found:

quote:

1990 - 1999

14 superhero movies released

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles had 2 releases in this time period, Batman had 3

2000 to current:

48 superhero movies released

X-Men (and spin-offs) lead list at 7, Spiderman at 5, Batman at 4, Iron-Man at 3

Just for comparison sake, from 1990-1999 (9 years) there were 14 superhero movies made, as stated; from 2000 to 2009 there were 28 made.

Future (next 3 years):

19 scheduled for release


I'm sure there's some on this list, specifically the future, that haven't been announced or aren't updated but this is just from what I've read.
Posted by DukeSilver
Member since Jan 2014
2720 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:32 pm to
Not as much as these same exact posts are over-saturating this board.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58065 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:35 pm to
no
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158760 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

, in my opinion, because they know superhero flicks sell and they will continue to just push out whatever they can to make a quick buck


they're putting quality film makers and actors behind them. They aren't just putting out dog shite because people mindlessly go see them. For the most part, they've made for good movies.
Posted by MasCervezas
Ocean Springs
Member since Jul 2013
7958 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56334 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:36 pm to
Although it's getting old, kids will continue to flock to these movies for the foreseeable future. I don't see it playing out for a while, not until it's gotten so used up and ridiculous that even kids abandon it.
Posted by The Eric
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
20989 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:38 pm to
I don't think it is over saturated. But only because they are tying them closely together like comic books. They are all building towards something and playing off of each other. This means I'm more invested. If it was just a bunch of random comic book movies that weren't really connected is probably be a little more burnt out.

Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15737 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:40 pm to
Are superhero movies still killing it at the box office and being critically acclaimed?

They are? I guess the answer is no then
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:53 pm to
as long as the narrative of the universes advances, no.

Fox has no real structure to their movies. Each movie is made without thinking about the next one.

The MCU has some bumps, but at least they are doing a proper event.

DC looks like they are doing the same thing.


Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:56 pm to
One encapsulates 10 years, the other encapsulates 15 years with a fad in 1) superheroes and 2) the technology to make such films work (and the money to back them for future films.

Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:59 pm to
No. Comic book fans like myself see loving this. I'm already excited about Summer 2017.

You don't have to go. And they're putting big named actors and proven directors behind these movies.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:59 pm to
Absolutely. Superhero movies completely replaced action movies, for the most part, somewhere around 2006.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47604 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

No. Comic book fans like myself see loving this. I'm already excited about Summer 2017.

You don't have to go. And they're putting big named actors and proven directors behind these movies.


This.

And as far is the studios are concerned, have you ever heard the phrase "Run it til they stop it"?

The studios have.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Are movie production companies over-saturating the market with superhero flicks?



I thought so about five years ago or so but I've actually been enjoying most of the recent comic flicks.


That said I'm even higher on the comic tv shows and I wouldn't be upset at all if all the money for comic movies was redirected to tv shows whose serialized format works better for comics.
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:22 pm to
I feel like they're over saturating the market with movies in general. It seems like every month there's a new movie out about something with some actors in it. It's just too much, I can't keep up. Two, maybe three movies a year that's all we need.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47604 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I feel like they're over saturating the market with movies in general. It seems like every month there's a new movie out about something with some actors in it. It's just too much, I can't keep up. Two, maybe three movies a year that's all we need.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31582 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:24 pm to
Carson incoming in 3....2.....1...
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:26 pm to
Did you see mad max or edge of tomorrow?
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37268 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Superhero movies completely replaced action movies, for the most part, somewhere around 2006.


This is true. Superhero movies and Science Fiction Action films have pretty much taken over for gritty action movies.

Which is the ONLY thing sad about the superhero movie craze. I want a proper, non-Vin Diesel, balls to the wall action film about some grizzled cop or soldier. (Granted, Jack Reacher and John Wick were both solid.)
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37268 posts
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

they're putting quality film makers and actors behind them. They aren't just putting out dog shite because people mindlessly go see them. For the most part, they've made for good movies.


This is the key difference. Think of other big movements in film, 70-80s Slasher Films, 80s Action Movies, etc.

In some cases, the results aren't really A+ quality (I mean I like Sleepaway Camp for what it is, but come on).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram