- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where do the Warriors fit historically if they win the title this year
Posted on 4/15/16 at 10:40 pm to theducks
Posted on 4/15/16 at 10:40 pm to theducks
quote:i guess, but i feel like thats what ultimately seperates a franchise. thats obviously not the end all be all but if you have the leagues 4th most titles, i will probably put you in a higher place than a consistently good franchise who cant get over the hump like the suns or the jazz
I think you're focusing too much on titles.
0
Posted on 4/15/16 at 10:48 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:
Lakers
Boston
Bulls
Miami
Spurs
lol wut???
Posted on 4/15/16 at 10:50 pm to chRxis
Miami is a lot like UCONN. It's hard to rank them historically because they have the titles but they don't have a long history.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 10:51 pm to WestCoastAg
This thread really illustrates how top heavy the NBA is, that a franchise with such an uninspiring history could be debated for being a top 5 all time in its sport
Posted on 4/15/16 at 10:53 pm to LL012697
yep
Posted on 4/15/16 at 11:02 pm to chRxis
quote:
lol wut???
Easily a better franchise than the Warriors. It isn't even close right now. Better win percentage, 18/28 winning seasons, more titles and final appearances since their inception than the Warriors, not to mention they were conceived when the NBA was really taking off. It's not debatable between them and the Warriors. If someone bet you who would win more titles or be more relevant in the next 30-50 years, you'd be a fool to pick the Warriors over the Heat. Miami, Detroit, and maybe Knicks, it becomes debatable.
Eta: WestCoastAG I just realized your metrics in the op are very flawed since they've been around far longer than many other franchises.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 11:12 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:and? you think the sixers would be 3rd in wins and playoff apperances if they werent an original franchise? the knicks are 4th in wins and 6th in playoff appearances, you think theyd have that many if they werent an original franchise? both are franchises you say are absolutely better than the warriors while laughing at their winning percentage when the sixers are 11th and the knicks are 17th in winning percentage
Eta: WestCoastAG I just realized your metrics in the op are very flawed since they've been around far longer than many other franchises.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 4/16/16 at 1:50 am to Starchild
quote:ummmmmm ya think?
.
A better question is where do they rank all time for an individual season?
Depends on the playoff run, but a good one puts them in the upper echelon imo
Posted on 4/16/16 at 3:52 am to mattz1122
quote:
I was laughing at Miami as a top five franchise
Miami since their inception has been,imo. Great owner,president.
Made runs,not all successful, with several great players.
Zo Mashburn Hardaway squad(and lost out on prime Juwan Howard)
had an intriguing squad DWade's rookie year (Odom,Butler,Jones,Wade)
then the Shaq trade
Then Heatles
now, if Bosh could stay healthy, would a serious threat in the East and still might make it to the ECF.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News