- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where do the Warriors fit historically if they win the title this year
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:42 pm to 13SaintTiger
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:42 pm to 13SaintTiger
it's not really hard to understand that they will be behind the lakers, celtics, bulls and spurs until they win several titles in a given time frame ... one year does not a dynasty make ...
0
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:49 pm to WestCoastAg
1. Celtics or Lakers
3. Bulls
4. Warriors (more conference titles than the Spurs)
5. Spurs
3. Bulls
4. Warriors (more conference titles than the Spurs)
5. Spurs
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:49 pm to Korin
quote:
1. Celtics or Lakers
3. Bulls
4. Warriors (more conference titles than the Spurs)
5. Spurs
Troll
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:50 pm to Korin
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:50 pm to WestCoastAg
Knicks are the most overrated franchise in sports.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:51 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:
Troll
Triggered.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:51 pm to tiderider
Why'd you edit your post?
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:52 pm to Korin
nm
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:52 pm to mattz1122
quote:
Knicks are the most overrated franchise in sports.
prolly don't follow pro sports as much as you do, but i'd like to know what other franchises are comparable ... browns? ... mets? ...
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:53 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
quote:
One additional conference title for the warriors trumps one additional NBA title for the Spurs? I have a hard time seeing that.
Maybe you should read the title of the thread.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:54 pm to Korin
Yeah, I caught it right after I posted.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:54 pm to Korin
quote:
Why'd you edit your post?
thought i was sure about a fact, but was not ...
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:55 pm to WestCoastAg
Right now, the Warriors are what the Suns of the mid-2000s or Kings of the early 2000s would have been had they closed the deal and won a title: A franchise that was irrelevant for decades who came out of nowhere to dominate with great offense for several years.
Now if they keep it up and win 3 or 4 titles with this group? Sure they're an elite franchise, but you have to do A LOT to make up for 4 decades of irrelevance.
Now if they keep it up and win 3 or 4 titles with this group? Sure they're an elite franchise, but you have to do A LOT to make up for 4 decades of irrelevance.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:55 pm to tiderider
Do y'all not realize that teams also get hardware for winning their conference?
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:57 pm to Roger Klarvin
You know the warriors have won 4 titles, right?
On second thought, I guess they were irrelevant for 'decades'. But I don't think you can put them in the suns category. Suns never won a title.
On second thought, I guess they were irrelevant for 'decades'. But I don't think you can put them in the suns category. Suns never won a title.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:59 pm to tiderider
I don't know about comparable franchises in other sports, but I do know the Knicks have just 5 division titles in their history and were legit championship contenders in the late '60s/early '70s and mid-'90s ('99 was a nice story but they didn't stand a chance) and that's it.
They've been a joke since 2000.
They've been a joke since 2000.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 7:24 pm to WestCoastAg
Top 10 for sure. Definitely behind LA, Boston, Chicago, & SA. I'd have to see the stats to adequately rank a top 10.
A better question is where do they rank all time for an individual season?
Depends on the playoff run, but a good one puts them in the upper echelon imo
A better question is where do they rank all time for an individual season?
Depends on the playoff run, but a good one puts them in the upper echelon imo
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 7:54 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:
Lakers
Boston
Bulls
Miami
Spurs
Ever hear of the 76ers?
.............
Or even Pistons or Knicks?
(The Warriors are Top 10 if they win it all again but where in that 10? Definitely not top 5.)
Posted on 4/15/16 at 7:58 pm to WestCoastAg
They would have five titles, but two of them come in the very early stages of the league. I could see someone having a different opinion but I think Detriot and Miami have been better franchises
Posted on 4/15/16 at 8:20 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:i still dont see how the knicks or pistons are just unquestionably higher on the all time list than the warriors. their resumes are pretty comparable
Or even Pistons or Knicks?
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News