Started By
Message

re: NBA Fans... Difference between today's game and 10+ years ago

Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:12 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422470 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

lol Yeah maybe in another 5 years but right now he's not even clearly better than Cousins or Blake.

AD in a down year has a 25+ PER

blake griffin has 0 seasons of 25+ PER
cousins has 2 (the same as AD)

last year, AD had a 30+ PER

quote:

They are the evolution of Celtics KG. They aren't anything even remotely close to prime KG.

AD is

KAT will be

they took the rangy, long, jump-shooting/passing style of KG and improved upon everything, basically

in KGs prime he was throwing up PERs circling 20
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Nothing in the rules changed since Pau and Kobe dominated the NBA with low post scoring


t's not an instantaneous reaction to the rules changes. Thibs didn't appear with his overload schemes until 07/08- and when teams copied him, offenses had to adjust too. We're seeing every team now on the same page, unlike before. There's a reason it's called MoreyBall- they started a trend.

quote:

teams stated winning with no low post offense.


Well the Heatles won 2 titles with LeBron in the post as their engine.

You should read this

Zach Lowe on the Rebirth of the Post Game

quote:

Smart post passing is a necessity now that defenses can bait post-up threats with all kinds of tricky help coverages. Fifteen years ago, Charles Barkley could back his man down and know the defense really had only two options: leave him in single coverage or send a hard double-team.

When the league scrapped the old illegal-defense rules, it freed coaches to get funky. Players can hover in open spaces; pretend they are going to help; swipe at the ball, and then recover back out to shooters; and emerge unannounced from almost anywhere.

Post-up scorers have to see two and three rotations ahead to create the most productive shots. If they go into a scoring move, they have to keep their head up, ready to improvise a pass if the defense sends help from an unexpected place. Post scorers who can’t think on their feet don’t present the same threat level they once did.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

is that why ben wallace got abused in international play?

anytime he had to leave the rim area he was abused

he was the primary reason we were embarrassed in the 2002 FIBA world championships


Go watch the Pistons vs Bucks and Nets in 04 they both tried to pull Big Ben away from the rim and he still dominated. Either way both Ben and Zo played away from the rim defensively a lot more than Kareem.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422470 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:20 pm to
kareem moved better and was more intelligent all around

he's also 7-2 while both zo/wallace were under 6-11

an mobile, skilled 7-2 guy translates into any era

a limited, explosive, unskilled 6-9 guy? not so much
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

t's not an instantaneous reaction to the rules changes. Thibs didn't appear with his overload schemes until 07/08- and when teams copied him, offenses had to adjust too. We're seeing every team now on the same page, unlike before. There's a reason it's called MoreyBall- they started a trend.
yeah and Lakers owned the NBA with low post scoring from 08-10? Spontaneous double teams are not a problem for great post scorers on great teams
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

kareem moved better and was more intelligent all around

he's also 7-2 while both zo/wallace were under 6-11

an mobile, skilled 7-2 guy translates into any era

a limited, explosive, unskilled 6-9 guy? not so much
You are talking about defense right? Both Zo and Ben were better more skilled, more mobile and smarter than prime Kareem and by the 80s Kareem(along with 99% of the NBA) stopped playing D altogether
This post was edited on 2/27/16 at 5:27 pm
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Spontaneous double teams are not a problem for great post scorers on great teams


No shite. Lowe says that. The problem is most bigs aren't Pau Gasol- a world class scorer and passer from the post.

And Bynum was only playing 20MPG on those Lakers teams in the playoffs- it wasn't anything like Gasol/Z-Bo twin towers. And even then, the Lakers were relying on a stretch/playmaking 4 in Lamar Odom. But thanks for playing.
Posted by Milesahead
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
572 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:28 pm to
Four of the Warriors starters are making more than 40% from 3. No zone defense and multiple positions shooting the 3 with aplomb would cause difficulty for ANY team of any era. They have size, depth, and play unselfish team ball. They play good defense. For anyone to pretend the Warriors aren't worthy of comparison with any other team is simply silly, ignorant, or closed-minded.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422470 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:29 pm to
yeah gasol and odom are the type of tall, skilled, and mobile big men that translate

patrick ewing is the one guy from that 80s/90s era who would have probably been even better today with how he played

the one i'm most curious about would be barkley
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202916 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Both Zo and Ben were better more skilled, more mobile and smarter than prime Kareem



I disagree here... For a 7'2 guy Jabbar was pretty mobile plus there are two shots that Zo and Ben could not stop.. The skyhook and Hakeems fade away jumper......
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

No shite. Lowe says that. The problem is most bigs aren't Pau Gasol- a world class scorer and passer from the post.

And Bynum was only playing 20MPG on those Lakers teams in the playoffs- it wasn't anything like Gasol/Z-Bo twin towers. And even then, the Lakers were relying on a stretch/playmaking 4 in Lamar Odom. But thanks for playing.


10-20-30 years ago there were always several bigs as good or better than Pau.

Pau and Kobe dominated with post scoring. It was not until Phil retired and they fell off that it opened up for the spread pick and roll crap we see now.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202916 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

patrick ewing is the one guy from that 80s/90s era who would have probably been even better today with how he played



Hakeem would DOMINATE in todays game... Ewing as well......
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422470 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

the spread pick and roll crap we see now.



yes ball movement, passing, shooting, and off-ball movement are terrible things to watch
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

patrick ewing is the one guy from that 80s/90s era who would have probably been even better today with how he played

the one i'm most curious about would be barkley
So wait Ewing the worst passer of all the great bigs would be even better
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422470 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:40 pm to
he was criticized in his day for shooting. people, esp the NY media when they'd flip out, would criticize him for not posting up
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34670 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Old codgers with petrified brains vs. people who lack the attention span to remember two years ago.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

yes ball movement, passing, shooting, and off-ball movement are terrible things to watch


Ball movement when it ends up in a 3 is repetitive
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422470 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:45 pm to
well that's just math

a 3 is a more valuable shot by a significant margin (50%)

hating teams relying on the 3 pointer is hating people who understand science and statistics
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34670 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

kareem moved better and was more intelligent all around he's also 7-2 while both zo/wallace were under 6-11


This is true. Alcindor/Jabbar was an incredibly smooth, graceful athlete.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 2/27/16 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

patrick ewing is the one guy from that 80s/90s era who would have probably been even better today with how he played


I think so. Robinson is another one that I think would fit pretty well too as a unicorn 5

quote:

the one i'm most curious about would be barkley


Yeah. He would be interesting. I dont know if his passing/decision making was good enough and I dont think he would have been able to play as he got older and more and more out of shape.

I see griffin as a modern Barkley type. Curious to see how his game ages too
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram