- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: how would you re-align mlb divisions?
Posted on 6/29/15 at 12:12 pm to BayouBengals03
Posted on 6/29/15 at 12:12 pm to BayouBengals03
C'mon
U have 6/7 of the top 20 markets in the Small market division?????
If they are top10 market and cannot compete, frick them, they become fodder for rest of big clubs. Always need fodder for the big and middle table clubs.
And St.Louis would go in Small Market. There are 22 teams who are in larger market than Cardinals.
U have 6/7 of the top 20 markets in the Small market division?????
If they are top10 market and cannot compete, frick them, they become fodder for rest of big clubs. Always need fodder for the big and middle table clubs.
And St.Louis would go in Small Market. There are 22 teams who are in larger market than Cardinals.
This post was edited on 6/29/15 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 6/29/15 at 12:12 pm to BayouBengals03
Start making the games last 90 minutes. And put the Astros back in the fricking NL.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 1:50 pm to geauxjuice
Baseball's weakness is how regional the coverage and attention span has been... your plan would exacerbate that issue IMO
Do not put all of the NE teams and CA teams in teh same divisions. You want the major media hubs to cover more than two divisions.
Do not put all of the NE teams and CA teams in teh same divisions. You want the major media hubs to cover more than two divisions.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 1:52 pm to geauxjuice
This is some of the stupidest shite I've ever read on the MSB, and that is saying something. There is no need or reason to change the divisions.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 1:52 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Pitchers have no business being in the batter's box.
Agreed.
I would have liked to see Roger Clemens in the box after some of his roid rages from the mound.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 2:05 pm to geauxjuice
Division realignment is silly. So is ejecting someone. Just have a penalty box and lock the player in there for an inning. If it's the pitcher, Brock Holt can just drop in for an inning of work.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 2:19 pm to molsusports
quote:
Baseball's weakness is how regional the coverage and attention span has been... your plan would exacerbate that issue IMO
Do not put all of the NE teams and CA teams in teh same divisions. You want the major media hubs to cover more than two divisions.
i know, every scenario i came up with you are left with at least one very "meh" division that you know would get very little coverage. mainly i was thinking how cool it would be to see the major population centers in the northeast, california, and great lakes in the same division and the rivalries that would create.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 2:23 pm to RollDatRoll
quote:
This is some of the stupidest shite I've ever read on the MSB, and that is saying something. There is no need or reason to change the divisions.
dont get me wrong i understand why the divisions are the way they are and i like them that way (aside from the previously mentioned brewers/astros controversy). this was just an exercise in creating geographically sensible super-divisions.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 2:27 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
I think MLB should go to every team using the DH
Steven Matz says, "frick you!"
Posted on 6/29/15 at 2:54 pm to geauxjuice
If you want to change baseball's divisions in a rational way you probably have to increase the total number of teams by two to get to 32 total. Then you have the potential for four divisions in both leagues.
Let's arbitrarily make the case that Sacramento and Austin are your expansion sites (large states with well supported baseball attendance, affluence, etc) because San Jose is SF territory, Las Vegas brings gambling and the other probable sites like Montreal, Providence, Charlotte, and Memphis don't look like they would have the combination of affluence and population to support a 162 game season.
Then you could talk about moving around a few teams while keeping intact a few blocks like:
yankees, red sox, orioles
cardinals, cubs, reds +/- pirates
phillies, mets
dodgers, giants, padres
tigers, twins, white sox, indians
A's, mariners
Let's arbitrarily make the case that Sacramento and Austin are your expansion sites (large states with well supported baseball attendance, affluence, etc) because San Jose is SF territory, Las Vegas brings gambling and the other probable sites like Montreal, Providence, Charlotte, and Memphis don't look like they would have the combination of affluence and population to support a 162 game season.
Then you could talk about moving around a few teams while keeping intact a few blocks like:
yankees, red sox, orioles
cardinals, cubs, reds +/- pirates
phillies, mets
dodgers, giants, padres
tigers, twins, white sox, indians
A's, mariners
Posted on 6/29/15 at 3:08 pm to geauxjuice
quote:
how would you re-align mlb divisions?
Add 2 teams to NL and 4 teams to AL (Astros back to NL)
AL East:
Rays
Orioles
Charolette
Yankees
Red Soxs
Blue Jays
AL Central:
Chicago White Soxs
Cleveland Indians
Minnesota Twins
Detroit Tigers
Kansas City Royals
Louisville team
AL West:
Texas Rangers
Oakland As
LAA
Seattle Mariners
Portland team
NOLA (I know I won't work economically but I want it dammit)
NL East:
Montreal Expos
New York Mets
Philly Phillies
Washington Nationals
Atlanta Braves
Miami Marlins
NL Central:
Chicago Cubs
St. Louis Cardinals
Cincy Reds
Pittsburh Pirates
Houston Astros
Milwaukee Brewers
NL West:
Arizona Diamondbacks
LAD
Colorado Rockies
San Diego Padres
SF Diamondbacks
Las Vegas teams
Posted on 6/29/15 at 3:39 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
It never made sense why they moved the Astros instead of the Brewers to the AL.
The real reason was its proximity to Chicago and Selig's wanting a close natural rival. A guaranteed sellout whenever they play, and at the time they were trying to finish up support of the new stadium.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 3:40 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Pitchers have no business being in the batter's box.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 3:46 pm to molsusports
This is really the best answer. Make sure there at 16 teams in each league so you don't have a daily inter league matchup.
I could see 4 4-team divisions with maybe 2 wild cards....but I also like the idea of two eight team divisions with each champ gets a "bye" and then four wild card teams play a series.
I could see 4 4-team divisions with maybe 2 wild cards....but I also like the idea of two eight team divisions with each champ gets a "bye" and then four wild card teams play a series.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 5:42 pm to SEC. 593
quote:
The real reason was its proximity to Chicago and Selig's wanting a close natural rival. A guaranteed sellout whenever they play, and at the time they were trying to finish up support of the new stadium
I guess the White Sox don't count in Selig's eyes - which I'm sure they don't. F Selig.....
Posted on 6/29/15 at 6:44 pm to jerseyfla
Like I said earlier, go back to pre-1994 divisions.
AL East
NY Yankees
Boston
Baltimore
Tampa Bay
Toronto
Detroit
Cleveland
AL West
Houston
Texas
Minnesota
LA Angels
Oakland
Seattle
Chicago
Kansas City
NL East
NY Mets
Philadelphia
Miami
Pittsburgh
Washington
Atlanta
Cincinnati
NL West
Milwaukee
Chicago
St. Louis
Colorado
Arizona
San Diego
LA Dodgers
San Francisco
AL East
NY Yankees
Boston
Baltimore
Tampa Bay
Toronto
Detroit
Cleveland
AL West
Houston
Texas
Minnesota
LA Angels
Oakland
Seattle
Chicago
Kansas City
NL East
NY Mets
Philadelphia
Miami
Pittsburgh
Washington
Atlanta
Cincinnati
NL West
Milwaukee
Chicago
St. Louis
Colorado
Arizona
San Diego
LA Dodgers
San Francisco
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News