- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:56 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
That example the receiver doednt establish possession according to the rules. Try again.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:57 pm to LNCHBOX
Lnch, how many yards does it take to get a first down? I want to see if you know this rule
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:57 pm to lsupride87
Not if he fails to maintain possession and the ball hits the ground.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:59 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
Holy shite what? He didn't establish possession, hence incomplete. If he had possession it's a td.
For your example, not Dez. Before someone tries to spin that around.
For your example, not Dez. Before someone tries to spin that around.
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 12:00 am
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:00 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Not if he fails to maintain possession and the ball hits the ground.
Wait, you told me a guy doesn't have possession at any time if he catches a ball and then let's go when he hits the ground.
How can I "maintain" something that is impossible to occur according to you?
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:02 am to Teddy Ruxpin
That's not what I saud actually. You can try and spin it all you want. There is no other result from a player possessing the ball and breaking the plane. Your example didn't have that, so it was pointless.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:02 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
spin
I can't spin the definitions of words
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:03 am to Teddy Ruxpin
Tell me another possible result of a player possessing the ball and breaking the plane.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:10 am to LNCHBOX
I'll bullet point it out again but I fear it's for naught.
Again:
1) Player catches ball in the endzone while in the air.
2) BY RULE "he must maintain possession through the ground.
Now, what does this rule imply?
It implies that a player has possession, BUT, possession can cease if he doesn't keep it through the ground. That is what the word "maintain" means. It means he must maintain the possession he has at that moment he is in the air.
3) Player hits the ground in the endzone and ball dislodges.
At this point, the player HAD possession but it was not maintained
4) Therefore, when he caught the ball while in the air he had 1) possession and 2) the ball had crossed the plane. YET it is not a dead play ruled as a TD.
I don't see how you can't follow this by your own words or I'm getting trolled which is fine. I'm bored anyways
Again:
1) Player catches ball in the endzone while in the air.
2) BY RULE "he must maintain possession through the ground.
Now, what does this rule imply?
It implies that a player has possession, BUT, possession can cease if he doesn't keep it through the ground. That is what the word "maintain" means. It means he must maintain the possession he has at that moment he is in the air.
3) Player hits the ground in the endzone and ball dislodges.
At this point, the player HAD possession but it was not maintained
4) Therefore, when he caught the ball while in the air he had 1) possession and 2) the ball had crossed the plane. YET it is not a dead play ruled as a TD.
I don't see how you can't follow this by your own words or I'm getting trolled which is fine. I'm bored anyways
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 12:13 am
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:14 am to Teddy Ruxpin
So the never had possession by rule? Got it.
Lance Moore made a clear football move and hit the ground in case you didn't see it. So he possessed the ball while breaking the plane. Your example, the receiver never has established possession. You've got to be joking with this shite.
Lance Moore made a clear football move and hit the ground in case you didn't see it. So he possessed the ball while breaking the plane. Your example, the receiver never has established possession. You've got to be joking with this shite.
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 12:15 am
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:17 am to Teddy Ruxpin
You're yhe one saying a receiver that doesn't possess the ball according to the rules is relevant to what I asked you.
I'll ask one last time so you can give the correct answer hopefully. Is there any result other than scoring when a player in possession of the ball according to the rules breaks the plane?
I'll ask one last time so you can give the correct answer hopefully. Is there any result other than scoring when a player in possession of the ball according to the rules breaks the plane?
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:18 am to LNCHBOX
Box, not sure if it is parsing words or not, but refs often say 'never had possession' or 'did not maintain'.
Not sure on the rulebook, but there is a big difference.
Not sure on the rulebook, but there is a big difference.
Posted on 1/12/15 at 6:36 am to fightin tigers
quote:
He has to make a football move. Diving towards the endzone is not a football move.
At first I was like ...
quote:
You don't want to reach the endzone in football.
...Then I was like
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:21 am to rockchlkjayhku11
in my opinion it appeared to be a catch. But my wife is a Lions fan so F the Boys! KARMA
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News