- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has Pat Haden been removed from the selection committee?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:04 pm to loweralabamatrojan
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:04 pm to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
especially the dismissal of Hayes Pullard, SC's best LB.
I was kind of rolling with you until this.
If that wasn't targeting then what in the hell is?
1
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:14 pm to Walking the Earth
1. He influenced the game by arguing calls with refs.
2. An AD should be up in the boxes, not coming down to cry to refs, because his coach is too much of a pussy to stick up for his team.
3. He should be removed as a playoff committee memeber,ASAP.
2. An AD should be up in the boxes, not coming down to cry to refs, because his coach is too much of a pussy to stick up for his team.
3. He should be removed as a playoff committee memeber,ASAP.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:19 pm to stlslick
considering the sanctions against USC it was a joke to even have their AD on the committee. The committee is a horrible fricking idea, the bcs computer rankings are so much better.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 11:55 am to heartbreakTiger
Posted on 9/8/14 at 11:58 am to JollyGreenGiant
what a joke to say his actions don't effect his capability.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 11:59 am to craigbiggio
quote:
He showed his arse today but I don't think it warrants him being removed from the committee.
Just proves that having people on the committee with current ties (even some with former ties) will still be emotional and biased. Its human nature.
Which is exactly why I am still completely against having AD's on the selection committee.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:03 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
what a joke to say his actions don't effect his capability.
He was always going to be biased towards USC and the PAC. This doesn't change that.
Hence why all the major conferences are represented.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:05 pm to More beer please
I think it's funny that almost the entire Committee on Infractions reviewing USC's charges were ADs, including from Oregon and Notre Dame, but there was no cry for recusal there.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:06 pm to Porkchop Express
And Stanford owns the Playoff Selection Committee in terms of voters with connections to that school.
But nobody seems to care about that.
But nobody seems to care about that.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:08 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
Zamoro10
Your melts on here have become my favorite thing to read on the MSB
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:10 pm to KosmoCramer
So will any league AD who is on the committee be banned from any discussions regarding ANY league teams or just their own? What would be a joke is if Hayden was allowed to argue the merits, one way or another, of Standford being given a place in the final four. Can you picture Jeff Long of the hawgs arguing the pros & cons of Louiville & his favorite coach? Isn't Allveraze of Wisconsin on the committee..and he gets to vote on Bret & the hawgs?
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:15 pm to JollyGreenGiant
quote:
“We appreciate the public apology and recognition of the errors in judgment, as well as Pat Haden’s self-imposed 2-game sideline ban. We took this into consideration as we determined the discipline.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:18 pm to JollyGreenGiant
quote:
quote:
Also on Haden incident, the College Football Playoff statement: "This does not effect Pat Haden's capability as a committee member."
But does it affect Pat Haden's capability as a committee member?
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:27 pm to More beer please
quote:im completely against a selection committee at all, no matter if they are current AD's, former ones, former players and what not. The BCS rankings would do a much better job selecting the playoffs
Which is exactly why I am still completely against having AD's on the selection committee.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:28 pm to Golfer
Because he went down on the field?
How does that possibly change anything?
How does that possibly change anything?
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:28 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
im completely against a selection committee at all, no matter if they are current AD's, former ones, former players and what not. The BCS rankings would do a much better job selecting the playoffs
:kige:
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:59 pm to Cap Crunch
I'm not melting...never really have.
As cool as the other side of the pillow
What's to melt about?
Over-reaction from others? Hyperbole from other posters over a nothing issue?
Nah.
Just pointing out the obvious. Nobody cares that Stanford is stacked on the committee and that other AD's are on the committee but Haden talking to an official during a game.
Oh my, the sky is falling. It's pathetic how people love to reach when it comes to USC.
As cool as the other side of the pillow
What's to melt about?
Over-reaction from others? Hyperbole from other posters over a nothing issue?
Nah.
Just pointing out the obvious. Nobody cares that Stanford is stacked on the committee and that other AD's are on the committee but Haden talking to an official during a game.
Oh my, the sky is falling. It's pathetic how people love to reach when it comes to USC.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News