- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Common misconceptions about big sports moments - what you got?
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:24 pm to witty alias
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:24 pm to witty alias
Game 7 was the worst ever as a Cards fan.
Tudor can find the strike zone
Andujar becomes idiot Andujar
Saberhagen decides to throw the game of his life
Tudor can find the strike zone
Andujar becomes idiot Andujar
Saberhagen decides to throw the game of his life
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:25 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Lots
calling bullshite on that.
not sure how a person could call them a baseball fan and not know the Sox didnt win a WS from 1918 until 2004
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:28 pm to tfl41
quote:
Something people forget and that dumbass commentators don't realize is that the patriots sent in more CBs that very play expecting pass. Serious FB people know that you have to pass there.
I always understood the logic of why they did it. I think the decision gets a lot closer when you consider who they had to run it. For example, if I was the Patriots, I'm probably throwing there too.
At they say, personnel, personnel, personnel.
For a misconception: Finkle would have made it if the laces were out.
Related: Scott Norwood gets shat on. A 47 yarder wasn't a chip shot. I think people think sometimes it was closer or something.
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:38 pm to tfl41
quote:
Serious FB people know that you have to pass there.
Why do you HAVE to pass there?
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:43 pm to Choupique19
quote:
Just finishing reading the previous posts, Calvin Schiraldi.
Didn't Schiraldi give up the hits but Stanley threw the wild pitch?
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:45 pm to tfl41
quote:
But presnap, you're thinking TD or incomplete. Throwing an incompletion there was the only thing that guaranteed Lynch getting the ball twice because they had one time out left.
If you run there and get stopped, you have to burn time out. Then if stuffed again on a run, game over.
It was 2nd down. They could have run it on 2nd. Timeout
Thrown on 3rd.
And do whatever they wanted on 4th
Not to mention that 1st down occurred at 1:06. They wasted time
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:45 pm to FalseProphet
quote:
Didn't Schiraldi give up the hits but Stanley threw the wild pitch?
Nobody knows, but we all know Buckner.
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:46 pm to Kracka
quote:
Bartman was just a scapegoat. Typical cubs shite.
I see it.
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:47 pm to Choupique19
quote:
The real GOAT was the reliever who had a 2 run lead in the bottom of the 10th with 2 outs and nobody on base. 3 straight base hits plus a wild pitch tied the game and had the winning run on 2nd base. It boggles my mind that whoever it was (you see, nobody talks about him) blew that game and remains anonymous.
The other side of that coin is that Fisk's 12th inning homer was the most photogenic of game 6, but not even close to the most important. Bernie Carbo tied the game in the 8th inning with a two-out, two-strike, 3 run shot to dead center field. Without that, the Sox go down in 6 with barely a whimper.
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:55 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Serious FB people know that you have to pass there.
Why do you HAVE to pass there?
if you do not know then you aren't a serious football person
I am fine with the play call because they only had one timeout. So idly they would have gone pass, run, timeout then run/pass on 4th for the game if needed. If they went run-TO-pass-run they risk pulling a UGA in the SEC title game where the receiver catches and burns out the clock without scoring.
Butler just made a boss play on the ball. It had nothing to with play call, that is a pass should never get picked. Wilson lead a hair to forward and Wide Receive went up like a bitch.
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:57 pm to Dire Wolf
It was 2nd down. They could have run it on 2nd. Timeout
Thrown on 3rd.
And do whatever they wanted on 4th
Not to mention that 1st down occurred at 1:06. They wasted time substituting and getting the play in
I hope to one day to reach your level of bullshite
Same 1 read play makes that unlikely. Anyways, they should have gone no huddle and ran the ball again with 50 seconds left
Thrown on 3rd.
And do whatever they wanted on 4th
Not to mention that 1st down occurred at 1:06. They wasted time substituting and getting the play in
quote:
you do not know then you aren't a serious football person ? ?
I hope to one day to reach your level of bullshite
quote:
If they went run-TO-pass-run they risk pulling a UGA in the SEC title game where the receiver catches and burns out the clock without scoring.
Same 1 read play makes that unlikely. Anyways, they should have gone no huddle and ran the ball again with 50 seconds left
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:00 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Not to mention that 1st down occurred at 1:06. They wasted time
no doubt
quote:
It was 2nd down. They could have run it on 2nd. Timeout
Thrown on 3rd.
And do whatever they wanted on 4th
this is a lot riskier because something like (below) can happen and you have no one to stop the clock
quote:
I hope to one day to reach your level of bullshite
for the record i was rolling my eyes at that smug arse comment.
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:03 pm to Dire Wolf
Throwing from the 9 is a lot different from throwing at the 1.
They ran a 1 read play. So he was either gonna throw that ball or throw it out of the back of the end zone
I think they were expecting NE to take a timeout
My apologies
They ran a 1 read play. So he was either gonna throw that ball or throw it out of the back of the end zone
I think they were expecting NE to take a timeout
quote:
for the record i was rolling my eyes at that smug arse comment.
My apologies
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:13 pm to TigerBait1127
i hear you. I still do not think it was necessarily a bad call. They just got beat on it.
Maybe you are right, even if Lockette caught the ball Butler was right there to blow him up
Maybe you are right, even if Lockette caught the ball Butler was right there to blow him up
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:21 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
3-0 lead in the top of the 8th, one out. Proceed to allow 8 runs to score, blame one fan when several were reaching for the ball.
Curse of the billy goat my arse. More like the curse of being a shitty fan base.
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:22 pm to Dire Wolf
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/4/15 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:26 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
It was 2nd down. They could have run it on 2nd. Timeout Thrown on 3rd. And do whatever they wanted on 4th
The argument is that by running and calling a timeout, it sets up a scenario where they have to throw on third to have a chance at stopping the clock. I'm more of a "go with what got you there" kind of person. And what got them there was Lynch being basically unstoppable.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News