Started By
Message

re: Common misconceptions about big sports moments - what you got?

Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:24 pm to
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139840 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:24 pm to
Game 7 was the worst ever as a Cards fan.

Tudor can find the strike zone
Andujar becomes idiot Andujar
Saberhagen decides to throw the game of his life
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58063 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Lots


calling bullshite on that.

not sure how a person could call them a baseball fan and not know the Sox didnt win a WS from 1918 until 2004
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 12:26 pm
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39578 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Something people forget and that dumbass commentators don't realize is that the patriots sent in more CBs that very play expecting pass. Serious FB people know that you have to pass there.



I always understood the logic of why they did it. I think the decision gets a lot closer when you consider who they had to run it. For example, if I was the Patriots, I'm probably throwing there too.

At they say, personnel, personnel, personnel.

For a misconception: Finkle would have made it if the laces were out.

Related: Scott Norwood gets shat on. A 47 yarder wasn't a chip shot. I think people think sometimes it was closer or something.
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 12:34 pm
Posted by tfl41
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2006
1552 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:34 pm to
Fair point
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Serious FB people know that you have to pass there.


Why do you HAVE to pass there?
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76519 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11707 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Just finishing reading the previous posts, Calvin Schiraldi.


Didn't Schiraldi give up the hits but Stanley threw the wild pitch?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

But presnap, you're thinking TD or incomplete. Throwing an incompletion there was the only thing that guaranteed Lynch getting the ball twice because they had one time out left.

If you run there and get stopped, you have to burn time out. Then if stuffed again on a run, game over.



It was 2nd down. They could have run it on 2nd. Timeout

Thrown on 3rd.

And do whatever they wanted on 4th

Not to mention that 1st down occurred at 1:06. They wasted time
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 12:47 pm
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61823 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Didn't Schiraldi give up the hits but Stanley threw the wild pitch?


Nobody knows, but we all know Buckner.

Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15176 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Bartman was just a scapegoat. Typical cubs shite.


I see it.
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
4414 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

The real GOAT was the reliever who had a 2 run lead in the bottom of the 10th with 2 outs and nobody on base. 3 straight base hits plus a wild pitch tied the game and had the winning run on 2nd base. It boggles my mind that whoever it was (you see, nobody talks about him) blew that game and remains anonymous.



The other side of that coin is that Fisk's 12th inning homer was the most photogenic of game 6, but not even close to the most important. Bernie Carbo tied the game in the 8th inning with a two-out, two-strike, 3 run shot to dead center field. Without that, the Sox go down in 6 with barely a whimper.
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45150 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:50 pm to
Babe Ruth calling his shot
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36610 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Serious FB people know that you have to pass there.


Why do you HAVE to pass there?



if you do not know then you aren't a serious football person

I am fine with the play call because they only had one timeout. So idly they would have gone pass, run, timeout then run/pass on 4th for the game if needed. If they went run-TO-pass-run they risk pulling a UGA in the SEC title game where the receiver catches and burns out the clock without scoring.

Butler just made a boss play on the ball. It had nothing to with play call, that is a pass should never get picked. Wilson lead a hair to forward and Wide Receive went up like a bitch.
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 12:57 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 12:57 pm to
It was 2nd down. They could have run it on 2nd. Timeout

Thrown on 3rd.

And do whatever they wanted on 4th

Not to mention that 1st down occurred at 1:06. They wasted time substituting and getting the play in

quote:

 you do not know then you aren't a serious football person ? ? 



I hope to one day to reach your level of bullshite

quote:

 If they went run-TO-pass-run they risk pulling a UGA in the SEC title game where the receiver catches and burns out the clock without scoring. 


Same 1 read play makes that unlikely. Anyways, they should have gone no huddle and ran the ball again with 50 seconds left
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 1:01 pm
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36610 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:00 pm to
quote:


Not to mention that 1st down occurred at 1:06. They wasted time


no doubt

quote:

It was 2nd down. They could have run it on 2nd. Timeout

Thrown on 3rd.

And do whatever they wanted on 4th



this is a lot riskier because something like (below) can happen and you have no one to stop the clock



quote:

I hope to one day to reach your level of bullshite



for the record i was rolling my eyes at that smug arse comment.
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 1:03 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:03 pm to
Throwing from the 9 is a lot different from throwing at the 1.

They ran a 1 read play. So he was either gonna throw that ball or throw it out of the back of the end zone

I think they were expecting NE to take a timeout

quote:

for the record i was rolling my eyes at that smug arse comment.


My apologies
This post was edited on 8/28/15 at 1:11 pm
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36610 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:13 pm to
i hear you. I still do not think it was necessarily a bad call. They just got beat on it.

Maybe you are right, even if Lockette caught the ball Butler was right there to blow him up

Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38408 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

3-0 lead in the top of the 8th, one out. Proceed to allow 8 runs to score, blame one fan when several were reaching for the ball.



Curse of the billy goat my arse. More like the curse of being a shitty fan base.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:22 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/4/15 at 8:26 pm
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6371 posts
Posted on 8/28/15 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

It was 2nd down. They could have run it on 2nd. Timeout Thrown on 3rd. And do whatever they wanted on 4th


The argument is that by running and calling a timeout, it sets up a scenario where they have to throw on third to have a chance at stopping the clock. I'm more of a "go with what got you there" kind of person. And what got them there was Lynch being basically unstoppable.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram