- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU is No. 4 National Seed - Plays Jackson St. Friday at 2pm
Posted on 5/27/13 at 12:45 pm to LSUGrad9295
Posted on 5/27/13 at 12:45 pm to LSUGrad9295
They were doing that in the same years we were constantly winning the season attendance record. According to your link
0
Posted on 5/27/13 at 12:50 pm to The Boat
i know, i know... The new SEC tourney format got me all rattled and I still can't shake it off.
This post was edited on 5/27/13 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 5/27/13 at 12:55 pm to lsurulz1515
I think they tried to make sure LSU and Vandy were apart.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 12:58 pm to JPLSU1981
Wow. I get the perception that the #4 seed was a slight, but this isn't football, guys. It's been said a million times, but the seeding doesn't mean a damn thing as long as you are one of the top 8. Once you are in the top 8, the big question is the draw, who you have to play to get to Omaha.
LSU got a GREAT draw. They got a better draw than UNC did at #1. The SEC also got 9 teams in when we figured that they were going to jam the ACC crap down our throats with 4 National Seeds.
LSU got a GREAT draw. They got a better draw than UNC did at #1. The SEC also got 9 teams in when we figured that they were going to jam the ACC crap down our throats with 4 National Seeds.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:03 pm to ffishstik
You're right ... the 4-see was a bit of a slight (we deserved 3 or higher IMO), but it doesn't matter and on paper we indeed got a better draw than 1-3 ... ULL and Virginia Tech is nice smooth path to Omaha, with no "perennial powers" with loads of postseason experience standing in our path.
This post was edited on 5/27/13 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:04 pm to T
quote:
mississippi state was drawing crowds of over 10,000 before lsu even dreamed of doing that.
so only 1 team can have an impact on college baseball?
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:04 pm to Strannix
Be Happy! LSU, nor many have won it all from the #1 seed.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:08 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
so only 1 team can have an impact on college baseball?
no retard, that's what i'm arguing about.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:16 pm to T
Forget the number next to our name and focus on the teams in our regional & super. We got about as good of a road to Omaha as we could get. I'm not saying it's a cakewalk but it could have been a lot worse.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:17 pm to T
quote:
no retard, that's what i'm arguing about.
Pump the breaks, champ.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:26 pm to Skooter
#4 is alright with me. The #1 seed hasn't won a championship in forever.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:30 pm to Purple and Geaux
when Vandy went #2 we pretty much were guaranteed #4,...If Vandy was #1, we would have been #3
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:34 pm to ThePoo
Is Cox Sports picking up the ESPn3 feed or is Bases Loaded the only TV channel other than online?
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:35 pm to Mattgobear
Cox can't show any games due to ESPN picking up all games.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:37 pm to ThePoo
quote:
when Vandy went #2 we pretty much were guaranteed #4,...If Vandy was #1, we would have been #3
the committee actually got their heads out of their asses for a change and jumped Oregon State over us for this lone reason. Glad they got a small piece of the puzzle right.
This post was edited on 5/27/13 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:39 pm to HoustonTiger4
quote:
Cox can't show any games due to ESPN picking up all games.
I'm confused on that. If ESPN doesn't show an LSU game as a feature game (on ESPN, ESPN2 or ESPNU), I'd think they'd let regional TV partners like CST pick up the ESPN3 games. If not, that is stupid.
This post was edited on 5/27/13 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:41 pm to Festus
quote:
the committee actually did this to help us out
quote:
If true, then they should have done LSU #1, Vandy #2, in my humble opinion.
YES I Agree, or vice versa ...or LSU 2 and Vandy 4...
This post was edited on 5/27/13 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:44 pm to LASPORTSBABE
quote:
the committee actually got their heads out of their asses for a change and jumped Oregon State over us for this lone reason. Glad they got a small piece of the puzzle right.
Exactly. I actually figured that it would be:
UNC
LSU/Vandy
Virginia
LSU/Vandy
I get putting Oregon State there, though.
This post was edited on 5/27/13 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:44 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
not really difficult to understand.
Crushes attendance records, shows baseball can be profitable, etc
My question is was Miss State profitable as a college baseball program before LSU was? Also were there any other baseball programs in the nation that made a profit the same time as or anytime before LSU did? If yes to any of those questions then that's one of the arguments gone. You also have to prove that the only reason college baseball programs started making money was because LSU proved it to them.
Posted on 5/27/13 at 1:47 pm to LASPORTSBABE
Vandy still won the SEC. LSU won a one game sample that was basically even until extra innings. I have no problem with Vandy getting respect. It should be Vandy #1 and LSU #2.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News