Started By
Message

re: Interesting perceptions vs. reality regarding the Miles and Orgeron offenses

Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:02 pm to
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

This continues to be the oversimplification of the issue. Reducing Miles to four games to overlook his obvious deficiencies in balance and in overall play running an opportunities for additional plays. Miles wasn't the coach for 4 games. Comparing two games where he had to be pass heavy because he trailed with an outlier game where LSU scored at will on very few plays does nothing to further the understanding of what we're seeing or what we used to see.


Yes I agree. The OP is using the first two games of this season with Miles. Why not use the last 3 years to get a better statistical assessment.
Posted by FUBAR
USA
Member since Sep 2004
4442 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:02 pm to
Under Orgeron LSU executes the play action pass... Miles did not
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84883 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Would love to see this just for first quarter. Once game is in hand, things change.


I can get it, but it's not like the game has been in hand in the first quarter very often for Orgeron.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

LSU is averaging less than half an attempt more with Orgeron than Miles. In fact, LSU is actually passing the ball 40.4% of the time with Orgeron and passed it 41.9% of the time with Miles.


LSU passed the ball 38% of the plays in 2013 with Mett, Landry and OBJ. Then some where around 35% in 2014 and 2015. I would like to see what the passing on 1st down percentages were for those years with Miles and Cam compared to under Orgeron.

Not that it's all in the stats anyway. There is a lot more to it than that.

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84883 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

The OP is using the first two games of this season with Miles. Why not use the last 3 years to get a better statistical assessment.


I'm using the first 4 games for Miles this year and the 3 games for Orgeron. Should I just use the Etling games for each?

It doesn't seem very wise to compare 3 games for Orgeron vs 3 seasons for Miles does it?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:12 pm to
quote:


OVerall on first half plays we are throwing the ball 46% of the time with Orgeron and 42% of the time with Miles

That is not an insignificant difference.

I'm guessing it gets even more interesting broken down by quarter.

If I'm one dimensional as frick in a game and can't move the ball....... Then, upon falling behind, I throw a ton of passes in my final two series of downs, but you are diverse and thus, late in the game, you get to ram it down their throats, we might end up with the exact same percentages. But that's hardly informative.

Moreover, defenses with leads tend to keep things in front of them and give up bull shite garbage yards.

So. You and I might even end up with similar passing yards.

Finally. If, as a result of not being one dimensional, the backs go the frick off, that's going to affect the percentages of yards between passing and running.

This is but one more reason stat hounding by itself is dumb.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25098 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

So USM is an outlier but the 82 plays we ran against Mizzou should count? We ran 64 vs Ole Miss. Use that as the baseline if you want, but it is still 5 more plays a game than we were running.

I gave Orgeron credit for the impressive yards per play average overall. Should I discard the USM game from that metric?


I think both samples are too small to make the kind of sweeping generalizations you're going for. Orgeron is taking the opportunity in his limited games to get additional reps. He hasn't shut blowouts down too early. He has had his team ready to play shitty opponents and Ole Miss. Saying we don't run more plays because Southern Miss was our bitch in the second half, as I already stated, misses the point. We're running more plays in normal games then we did under Miles. We are trying to make our opponents give up instead of our team being told the opponent gives up. We approach each drive with the goal of gaining yardage and trying to score instead of being tough guys and dictating to the defense that we're so much more masculine than they are--or whatever outmoded idea of toughness Miles was going for.
This post was edited on 10/25/16 at 5:18 pm
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23327 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Under Orgeron LSU executes the play action pass... Miles did not


Some of this needs to be attributed to Etling, as well. He has BY FAR the best play action fake we've seen since Flynn. Even better than Mett. I noticed it as soon as he started playing, and Jesse Palmer complimented him on it during the OM game. He is very deceptive with his hand movements and disguises the ball well. You can tell he has put a LOT of time and effort into polishing the details.

In contrast, Harris and Jennings were both pretty awful in play action they would both just stick the ball out and pull it back. It was a lot easier to tell it was a fake.
This post was edited on 10/25/16 at 5:21 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84883 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

This is but one more reason stat hounding by itself is dumb.


It's part of the picture. I stated in the OP that I found the numbers surprising. I approached it trying to quantify what we've been seeing, if it was even possible.

quote:

That is not an insignificant difference.



People felt Miles throwing it 42% of the time compared to 38% or so last year was proof of his stubbornness. Either it is or it isn't a significant difference.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25098 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

People felt Miles throwing it 42% of the time compared to 38% or so last year was proof of his stubbornness. Either it is or it isn't a significant difference.


Calling half your passes on your last desperation drive against an opponent isn't telling us anything about the philosophy--that is what you would be expected to do. Football is played by situation and when you don't examine that, you miss a big part of why the numbers are what they are.
This post was edited on 10/25/16 at 5:27 pm
Posted by TigerinDunbarton
Dunbarton
Member since Sep 2016
1735 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 6:00 pm to
It was never about getting 50% balance. LSU is a running team...it is about being unpredictable, and utilizing the full field and all the positions on the ffield..on not being scared to throw from your own end of the field...of not letting the foot off the gas. This offense is light years better now.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84883 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Calling half your passes on your last desperation drive against an opponent isn't telling us anything about the philosophy--that is what you would be expected to do. Football is played by situation and when you don't examine that, you miss a big part of why the numbers are what they are.




Sure, but those are 1st half numbers, so...
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 6:24 pm to
quote:


It's part of the picture. I stated in the OP that I found the numbers surprising.

I didn't.

The proper way to be a power football team is to be able to just ram it late.

People think running sets up the pass. That is false. The ABILITY to run sets up the pass. It does so because teams can't just come out in pass coverage. They have to set up to defend the run. Only a fricking tard looks at a team selling out to stop the run and doesn't think, "make em pay for that".

quote:


People felt Miles throwing it 42% of the time compared to 38% or so last year was proof of his stubbornness. Either it is or it isn't a significant difference.

Again. You are looking at full games without checking distribution.

He always averages more passes in games he loses due to starting off one dimensional.

Hell. LSU threw 51 passes against Ole Miss last year. Fewer than 20 in the first half and even then, not really until we fell behind bad.

This year was no different. He only threw a tiny bit more because in two of the games he HAD to. Look at the Wisky game. Yeah. We threw 21 passes but 14 were in the second half and over half those were in the 4th quarter.

Miles was literally fricking retarded when it came to understanding the VALUE a serious run threat is to your passing game.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram