Started By
Message

re: Interesting perceptions vs. reality regarding the Miles and Orgeron offenses

Posted on 10/25/16 at 11:48 am to
Posted by Pmtiger
Member since Dec 2014
837 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 11:48 am to
Slackster. I always enjoy your posts

- looks to me like linemans splits are wider
- legs are fresher
- unpredictable play calling / timing
- passing game is more diverse . Different route trees than prior regime

Posted by releauxded2469
Boise, ID
Member since Jan 2015
1912 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 11:51 am to
quote:

JD Moore injured


I thought he sat out for concussion protocol. He should be good to go for Bama. With that being sai, Mouton looked good this past week. Definitely had some key blocks.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 11:51 am to
The difference is playcalling. Miles refusal to use the middle of the field severely inhibited his offense.
This wasnt an issue when lsu was vastly superior talent wise but when other sec west teams closed that gap his offensive flaws were killing us.
This post was edited on 10/25/16 at 4:28 pm
Posted by TexasSinger
Front Row
Member since Feb 2006
4480 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 11:55 am to
As much of a big fan I am of JD Moore, that 2 TE-2 WR-1RB formation is so dangerous based on the amount of plays you can run out of it. And we are seeing it. It really spreads the defensive front 7 out to get better running lanes and is just easier on the Oline for blocking schemes. Plus on play action, the TEs have so many more route options than a FB out of the backfield. Puts even more pressure on the D.

That was a staple formation back in the day in Indy with Manning, James, Harrison, Wayne with Pollard & Clark. And you see it more and more today.
Posted by NorthTiger
Upper 40
Member since Jan 2004
3839 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 12:01 pm to
The formations we use gives defenses more that they have to protect against. Play action on early downs keeps defenses honest. We go big when we use 2 TEs but when we spread the field like we have been doing defenses have to respect the pass. The key to our offense is being able to pass efficiently enough to keep defenses from stacking the box.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84886 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

We also seem to be hitting way more receivers than before.


Seem is the key word. Dupre and Dural have basically the same percentage of total receptions with Miles and Orgeron.

Someone mentioned a good point earlier though - using more guys isn't as important as having those guys out there and running routes. We've shown that we will throw to them, even if only occasionally, so their presence on the field is still something to monitor.
Posted by Nix to Twillie
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2015
17735 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 12:16 pm to
We're also actually making the defense respect the tight end by actually throwing to him. Chark was wide open on that TD pass because the DB bit on the tight end. Little things.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84886 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 12:17 pm to
Spreading the field is an interesting way to word it. It seems as though LSU has traded a vertical passing game for one that is more willing to work sideline to sideline. The latter has truly opened things up, or so it appears through 3 games.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18138 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 12:36 pm to
More unpredictable play calling out of different formations, and a QB that can read defenses and throw accurate balls. Very simple, actually.
Posted by LSUStar
Medellin
Member since Sep 2009
10442 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 12:40 pm to
What is the completion % under O v CLM? How many pass plays for first down? How many successful pass plays on first down?
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23075 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 12:41 pm to
We have a lot more big plays than before so we are scoring much faster. That's why the plays per game isn't a huge difference.

We are calling passing plays that Etling can usually execute. We are seeing slants more than I can remember and they are moving the chains.

Our running game has never looked better. I attribute that to the shake up on the Oline as well as the blocking scheme that Grimes has been changing.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118819 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

I know Orgeron can't exactly overhaul the entire offensive side of the ball, but are all the impressive numbers really the result of such relatively minor tweaks?


Yes.

We are playing on a football field now, not a bedroom closet. Simple changes in offensive formations opens up space for our athletes to work. It's not that complicated however apparently it was very complicated for Miles.
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
5991 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Others have suggested it is more passing plays - LSU is averaging less than half an attempt more with Orgeron than Miles. In fact, LSU is actually passing the ball 40.4% of the time with Orgeron and passed it 41.9% of the time with Miles.


We're COMPLETING 64 percent in the last 3 games as compared to 53 percent in the first 4 games.
That forces the defense to be honest.
Even if it's instant passes to the LoS. Which, "tangibly" there were about 8 of against Ole Miss. There were 2 that I remember against Wisconsin (both of which were our better plays of the day - a first down and a touchdown with Dural beating his man 1 on 1).

I think Fresher legs has a lot to do with it too.

All of this equals the 3 yards per play more we're averaging which produces the momentum and the energy for the D to see what they're playing for!

This post was edited on 10/25/16 at 4:06 pm
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45129 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 1:09 pm to
As you said its about personnel groupings and the same plays out of different formations. The main difference is they are not so predictable.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

We also seem to be hitting way more receivers than before.


Seem is the key word. Dupre and Dural have basically the same percentage of total receptions with Miles and Orgeron.


What about the rest of the receivers/TEs? I feel like far more players are involved in the passing game than before, even if the main guys are getting the same looks.

Also, the routes are "executable" instead of dummy routes and blocking assignments. My 5 year old niece could tell when Les was about to run the ball.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84886 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

I know you're solid on posts like these, but what is your source/methods for getting these figures?



CFB stats.com, ESPN play by play data, and some guy on an Ole Miss SB Nation blog who broke down the formations of Miles last two games and Orgeron's first two.
Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9581 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

We line up in double TE sets more now than ever.

quote:

But we actually throw to those tight ends and our fullbacks now. We're running formations that scream traditional power run play, but passing out of them which is huge. Keeps the defense guessing when we line up like that and allows us to run more effectively out of it.


This X10000000000000000000000000000000000000000

this is what is making all the difference in the world.. DeSean Smith was one of the highest recruited players out of LA, he should be targeted 7-8 times a game.. It gets those LB's out of the box and one on one with Fournette and DB's and we've all seen how well that works out for the DB's...
Posted by km
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5653 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 1:21 pm to
The biggest change is using the passing game to open up the running game.
Posted by mostbesttigerfanever
TD platinum member suite in TS
Member since Jan 2010
5016 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 1:25 pm to
who cares how the O lines up. the bottom line is ball distribution, especially through the air

multiple TE's with catches
multiple WR's with catches
RB's out of the backfield
bootlegs

etc
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84886 posts
Posted on 10/25/16 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

The biggest change is using the passing game to open up the running game.


I think a distinction should be made here though. We're not throwing it substantially more in any situation than we were before. The difference appears to be the types of passing plays are easier to execute and we're completing them at a higher clip. Sometimes with Les it felt like we were passing just for the day of throwing the ball, not for any specific purpose or goal though.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram